Whatever happened to them? Were they ever a good idea or just another crazy gimmick? Who used one? I had completely forgotten they ever existed until something I read the other day reminded me of them.
What other cycling innovations have been lost in the mists of time?
Answering my own question: having just done a quick Google I discover that Bobby Julich used an oval chainring in a TT in Canada last year. Are they still in widespread use then?
Whatever happened to them? Were they ever a good idea or just another crazy gimmick? Who used one? I had completely forgotten they ever existed until something I read the other day reminded me of them.
Shimano BioPace was the most famous example. I think they died out because the majority of users hated them. Felt horrible to me.
Quoted message said:
What other cycling innovations have been lost in the mists of time?
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:58:52 +0100, in <[email hidden]>, "Pete Biggs"
Quoted message said:
davek said:
Whatever happened to them? Were they ever a good idea or just another crazy gimmick? Who used one? I had completely forgotten they ever existed until something I read the other day reminded me of them.
Shimano BioPace was the most famous example. I think they died out because the majority of users hated them. Felt horrible to me.
I seem to recall seeing something on Tomorrows World that was a round chainring that was extendable to become oval.
Am I imagining things?
-- [email hidden] Personal Site: www.artybee.net (same [censored], different layout) Sutton Brass : www.suttonbrass.org.uk
Shimano BioPace was the most famous example. I think they died out because the majority of users hated them. Felt horrible to me.
My sister in law had an MTB with one on. To be quite honest I couldn't tell any difference, so I suspect they died from apathy at increased cost as much as anything else...
Quoted message said:
Recumbents :-)
Not so much "lost in the mists of cycling time" as "obscured by a rather overbearing smoke machine operated by the UCI" :-(
Other "you don't see those so much" would include handlebar stem suspension. I was going to say Raleigh Choppers, but I'm just about to be upstaged there...
Pete. -- Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinchOpen ↗
Shimano BioPace was the most famous example. I think they died out because the majority of users hated them. Felt horrible to me.
Quoted message said:
My sister in law had an MTB with one on. To be quite honest I couldn't tell any difference, so I suspect they died from apathy at increased cost as much as anything else...
Your girlfriend still has an old tourer with one (or two actually) 😉 Was a special offer at the time when I was putting my first bike together from various odds and ends. I don't think I did notice much difference either, though I have been very happy with that bike.
Answering my own question: having just done a quick Google I discover that Bobby Julich used an oval chainring in a TT in Canada last year. Are they still in widespread use then?
I think Shimano reinvented the wheel when they introduced 'constant radius' chainrings.
I don't really think Biopace made any difference to the way I rode.
Shimano branded gearing. I never realised Shimano (Or anyone for that matter) had tried quadruple.
AFAIK they didn't. It could be done with TA Cyclotouriste and Stronglight 49D chainsets, by using longer bolts, but that limited you to a 26T smallest ring.
At least two manufacturers - Qud and (IIRC) Avid - made adapters for 74/110 mm chainsets, which allowed the use of a freewheel sprocket as the fourth ring, and could thus have a 17T smallest ring. I know someone with a 17/34 bottom gear on his Peer Gynt...
In message <[email hidden]>, Helen Deborah Vecht <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
davek <[email hidden]>typed
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Whatever happened to them?
Quoted message said:
Answering my own question: having just done a quick Google I discover that Bobby Julich used an oval chainring in a TT in Canada last year. Are they still in widespread use then?
I think Shimano reinvented the wheel when they introduced 'constant radius' chainrings.
:-)
Chris Bell still seems to make his oval Eggrings (jolly nice chainrings, even if you just get round ones)
I don't really think Biopace made any difference to the way I rode.
Thing about Biopace was that they got it the 'wrong' way round, as compared to the general theory on oval chainrings - the idea being that they are arranged such that you get a lower gear effectively when pedalling through the 'deadspot' at the top and bottom of the pedal circle.
Whatever happened to them? Were they ever a good idea or just another crazy gimmick? Who used one? I had completely forgotten they ever existed until something I read the other day reminded me of them.
What other cycling innovations have been lost in the mists of time?
I seem to recall seeing something on Tomorrows World that was a round chainring that was extendable to become oval.
Am I imagining things?
No, there's one pictured in the third edition of "Bicycling Science"
I think I remember that episode of tomorrow's world - very much a child of the 80's. But I thought it was some kind of continuously variable gear.
Yep, that's the one. IIRC it was invented by Frank Whitt (co- author of earlier editions of "Bicycling Science"😉, and expanded along one axis to increase its circumference, thereby providing a larger chainring. The Deal Drive of the early/mid-Eighties did something similar, but expanded the like a camera shutter so as not to leave the rider with an outrageously oval chainring in top gear.
Neither achieved production, though I think the Deal Drive came close - I remember John Kingsbury had a commuter HPV on the drawing board ready to use it as soon as it was available.
> I seem to recall seeing something on Tomorrows World > that was a round chainring that was extendable to > become oval. > > Am I imagining things?
No, there's one pictured in the third edition of "Bicycling Science"
I think I remember that episode of tomorrow's world - very much a child of the 80's. But I thought it was some kind of continuously variable gear.
Yep, that's the one. IIRC it was invented by Frank Whitt (co-author of earlier editions of "Bicycling Science"😉, and expanded along one axis to increase its circumference, thereby providing a larger chainring. The Deal Drive of the early/mid-Eighties did something similar, but expanded the like a camera shutter so as not to leave the rider with an outrageously oval chainring in top gear.
Hmmnn... Google finds nothing, for once - on the deal drive, and almost gets a whack on Frank Whitt and chainwheels. Presumably it had to move in little steps, or else you'd get some slack chain between the chainwheels?
Quoted message said:
Neither achieved production, though I think the Deal Drive came close - I remember John Kingsbury had a commuter HPV on the drawing board ready to use it as soon as it was available.