Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Others making octalink bottom brackets now??

Started by vintage · · Last activity · 9 posts · 296 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
10 July 2006
Last activity
11 July 2006
Original author
vintage
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
296
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I thought shimano owned all the patents to octalink so no other company
    could produce them. Hence isis etc.

    What do you make of these token shimano bottom brackets then?

    Down the page on new products.
    http://www.tokenproducts.com/2005/05htm/whatsnew.php

    They state they work with all shimano groups. I have a FSA team carbon
    octalink crankset and assume this would work with it?

  2. vintage said:

    I thought shimano owned all the patents to octalink so no other
    company could produce them. Hence isis etc.

    What do you make of these token shimano bottom brackets then?

    Down the page on new products.
    http://www.tokenproducts.com/2005/05htm/whatsnew.php

    They state they work with all shimano groups. I have a FSA team
    carbon octalink crankset and assume this would work with it?

    Octalink II or I? I only see II, and FSA, Truvativ both have their own
    external BBs, too.
    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  3. My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came out
    first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be octalink
    one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end stuff is octalink
    two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit my
    cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new shimano
    crank models.

    "Phil Lee, Squid" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    vintage said:

    I thought shimano owned all the patents to octalink so no other
    company could produce them. Hence isis etc.

    What do you make of these token shimano bottom brackets then?

    Down the page on new products.
    http://www.tokenproducts.com/2005/05htm/whatsnew.php

    They state they work with all shimano groups. I have a FSA team
    carbon octalink crankset and assume this would work with it?

    Octalink II or I? I only see II, and FSA, Truvativ both have their own
    external BBs, too.
    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  4. vintage said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came out
    first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be
    octalink one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end
    stuff is octalink two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit
    my cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new
    shimano crank models.

    It's not that... I just don't see it on the website. Can you send a link to
    the page or a picture of it?

    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  5. "Phil Lee, Squid" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    vintage said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came out
    first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be
    octalink one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end
    stuff is octalink two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit
    my cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new
    shimano crank models.

    It's not that... I just don't see it on the website. Can you send a link


    to

    Quoted message said:

    the page or a picture of it?

    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

    Here's a pic of it. The road one is the top one
    TK877EX EX-TYPE Bottom Bracket
    a.. Specially designed for use with integrated cranksets
    a.. Compatible with Shimano groups
    a.. Durable forged aluminum cups CNC machined
    a.. Double sealed cartridge bearings construction
    TK877EX/Grey anodized for Road & CX
    (Compatible Dura Ace, Ultegra, 105)
    TK877EX/Black anodized for all mountain
    (Compatible XTR, XT, LX)
    TK877EX/Gold anodized for FR & DH
    (Compatible Hone, Saint)
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for Road & CX to use 68mm shell
    a.. ITA.36mmx24T for Road to use 70mm shell
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for MTB, FR, DH to use 68/73mm shell
    a.. Weight: 89g/Road, 95g/MTB

    a.. SKF bearings for option
    a.. Ceramic Bearings for option(#6805TC)

  6. "vintage" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came out
    first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be octalink
    one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end stuff is
    octalink
    two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit my
    cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new shimano
    crank models.

    You're confusing Octalink I & II with Hollowtech I & II. Octalink I has the
    shallower grooves, and was used on DA7700, Ult6500, 105-5500, and is still
    used on Tiagra & Sora. Octalink II has the deeper grooves, and was used with
    last-gen XTR, XT and LX. It's still used on Deore.

    Hollowtech I is independent of BB interface, and just means the arms are
    hollow.

    Hollowtech II Shimano's trademark for the new 2-piece style with the
    outboard bearings. They don't have a patent on the design though, and
    everybody and their dog is now doing 2-piece cranks with outboard bearings.
    So, the reason they don't mention Octalink is because they're not Octalink.
    The outboard-bearing style don't have a spindle (that's part of the crank)
    and if you have Octalink I, you won't have anything to bolt your crankarms
    to if you tried the Token BBs you link to.

    Hope that makes sense.

  7. vintage said:

    "Phil Lee, Squid" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    vintage said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came
    out first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano
    trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be
    octalink one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end
    stuff is octalink two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit
    my cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new
    shimano crank models.

    It's not that... I just don't see it on the website. Can you send a
    link to the page or a picture of it?

    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

    Here's a pic of it. The road one is the top one
    TK877EX EX-TYPE Bottom Bracket
    a.. Specially designed for use with integrated cranksets
    a.. Compatible with Shimano groups
    a.. Durable forged aluminum cups CNC machined
    a.. Double sealed cartridge bearings construction
    TK877EX/Grey anodized for Road & CX
    (Compatible Dura Ace, Ultegra, 105)
    TK877EX/Black anodized for all mountain
    (Compatible XTR, XT, LX)
    TK877EX/Gold anodized for FR & DH
    (Compatible Hone, Saint)
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for Road & CX to use 68mm shell
    a.. ITA.36mmx24T for Road to use 70mm shell
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for MTB, FR, DH to use 68/73mm shell
    a.. Weight: 89g/Road, 95g/MTB

    a.. SKF bearings for option
    a.. Ceramic Bearings for option(#6805TC)

    Those are Octalink II/MegaExo/GXP-style bottom brackets, not first-gen
    Octalink.
    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  8. vintage said:

    "Phil Lee, Squid" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    vintage said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came
    out first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano
    trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be
    octalink one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end
    stuff is octalink two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit
    my cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new
    shimano crank models.

    It's not that... I just don't see it on the website. Can you send a
    link to the page or a picture of it?

    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

    Here's a pic of it. The road one is the top one
    TK877EX EX-TYPE Bottom Bracket
    a.. Specially designed for use with integrated cranksets
    a.. Compatible with Shimano groups
    a.. Durable forged aluminum cups CNC machined
    a.. Double sealed cartridge bearings construction
    TK877EX/Grey anodized for Road & CX
    (Compatible Dura Ace, Ultegra, 105)
    TK877EX/Black anodized for all mountain
    (Compatible XTR, XT, LX)
    TK877EX/Gold anodized for FR & DH
    (Compatible Hone, Saint)
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for Road & CX to use 68mm shell
    a.. ITA.36mmx24T for Road to use 70mm shell
    a.. BSA1.37"x24T for MTB, FR, DH to use 68/73mm shell
    a.. Weight: 89g/Road, 95g/MTB

    a.. SKF bearings for option
    a.. Ceramic Bearings for option(#6805TC)

    Make that Hollowtech
    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  9. "Hank Wirtz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "vintage" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My cranks are octalink one. The more shallow grove ones that came out
    first.

    I assume that token don't mention octalink as its a shimano trademark?

    If this token BB fits dura ace, ultegra, 105 it would have to be


    octalink

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    one too wouldnt' it. As far as I know only the lower end stuff is
    octalink
    two at the moment?

    I just don't really want a shimano BB. The new outer BB's would fit my
    cranks i assume though even though they are designed for the new shimano
    crank models.

    You're confusing Octalink I & II with Hollowtech I & II. Octalink I has


    the

    Quoted message said:

    shallower grooves, and was used on DA7700, Ult6500, 105-5500, and is still
    used on Tiagra & Sora. Octalink II has the deeper grooves, and was used


    with

    Quoted message said:

    last-gen XTR, XT and LX. It's still used on Deore.

    Hollowtech I is independent of BB interface, and just means the arms are
    hollow.

    Hollowtech II Shimano's trademark for the new 2-piece style with the
    outboard bearings. They don't have a patent on the design though, and
    everybody and their dog is now doing 2-piece cranks with outboard


    bearings.

    Quoted message said:

    So, the reason they don't mention Octalink is because they're not


    Octalink.

    Quoted message said:

    The outboard-bearing style don't have a spindle (that's part of the crank)
    and if you have Octalink I, you won't have anything to bolt your crankarms
    to if you tried the Token BBs you link to.

    Hope that makes sense.

    That makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the info guys.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.