Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

[OT] troll density and a.b

Started by Bleve · · Last activity · 21 posts · 1,280 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
1 October 2005
Last activity
3 October 2005
Original author
Bleve
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,280
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been around USENET for a -long- time (with a few holidays whilst
    between good/reliable newsfeeds). Used a lot of newsgroups, seen a lot
    of
    pretty weird behavior on them (and even been one of the nutcases/trolls
    myself at times! Arguably still now ...)

    It's always September somewhere (old USENET for there's always newbies
    who don't have a clue), but a.b's recent (last few months?) trolling
    density
    seems to me to be above anything I've ever seen before. It's not like
    a.b is a group with any real controversial stuff discussed in it. The
    most provocative stuff that goes on here is rants about bad drivers. If
    this was aus.politics.loony-right-wing I'd understand it ....

    There's the marty/bratton thing, which is laughable, the bratton
    (assuming
    that's who it really is posting the same thing dozens of times) thing
    smacks of
    some obsessed loon with a -lot- of spare time on its hands. Seen that
    sort
    of thing before, and usually the loon gets bored after a while or gets
    distracted
    by some other issue and goes away. A "While" can be quite a while in
    some cases ... as this seems to be. But, it's trivially easy to
    recognise as
    dribble and thus, easy to ignore. It's not annoying, it's just
    a bit of background noise. It's so absurd that even someone who
    stumbled onto it with no background at all would recognise it
    as some nut raving on.

    Then there's this stream-of-conciousness 'unicyclist' who scatter-posts
    incoherant ravings. Benign enough, and sometimes amusing. Then
    there's the mystery
    cut & paster. What digs? I don't know the history of a.b well enough
    to
    have seen what tripped these loons (if indeed they're multiple loons
    or just invocations of the same loon?) off? I can't be bothered going
    through
    the headers and tracking them down, not worth the effort.

    What happened way back when that
    attracted the loon(s)? If it's one person, that person must have a
    hell of
    a lot of spare time to spend on this pointless obsession. There's a
    lot
    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

  2. Bleve said:

    [snip]

    There's a
    lot
    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

    Never argue with a fool - they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. 🙂

    Ritch

  3. "Bleve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I've been around USENET for a -long- time (with a few holidays whilst
    between good/reliable newsfeeds). Used a lot of newsgroups, seen a lot


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

    As far as I can make out, Bratton is also the cut and paste troll. He's
    basically a sad git someqhere in California who's most likely on some form
    of mental disability pension and who's discovered that this internet thingy
    can be used to get attention if you're obnoxious enough. He tends to find
    one person and latch on obsessively for a while. Marty is just the latest.

    Stream of consciousness unicycle boy is a fairly new thing. He's been around
    for a little while but he used to post once a week rather once or twice a
    day. I think that was occasioned by the fact that his website hosting
    disappeared. Our overall troll level in terms of individual trolls is pretty
    low. There was a spate for a while when some of the rowdier elements in some
    motorist groups got bored and decided to come and flame us, but other than
    that, it's mostly Roger.

  4. everyone rides a bike at some stage?

    Gee, I almost miss DRS. At least he got your blood flowing. the rest are just a waste of time...

    F"doesnt really miss DRS"Dutch

  5. Bleve said:

    I've been around USENET for a -long- time (with a few holidays whilst
    between good/reliable newsfeeds). Used a lot of newsgroups, seen a lot
    of
    pretty weird behavior on them (and even been one of the nutcases/trolls
    myself at times! Arguably still now ...)

    It's always September somewhere (old USENET for there's always newbies
    who don't have a clue), but a.b's recent (last few months?) trolling
    density
    seems to me to be above anything I've ever seen before. It's not like
    a.b is a group with any real controversial stuff discussed in it. The
    most provocative stuff that goes on here is rants about bad drivers. If
    this was aus.politics.loony-right-wing I'd understand it ....

    There's the marty/bratton thing, which is laughable, the bratton
    (assuming
    that's who it really is posting the same thing dozens of times) thing
    smacks of
    some obsessed loon with a -lot- of spare time on its hands. Seen that
    sort
    of thing before, and usually the loon gets bored after a while or gets
    distracted
    by some other issue and goes away. A "While" can be quite a while in
    some cases ... as this seems to be. But, it's trivially easy to
    recognise as
    dribble and thus, easy to ignore. It's not annoying, it's just
    a bit of background noise. It's so absurd that even someone who
    stumbled onto it with no background at all would recognise it
    as some nut raving on.

    Then there's this stream-of-conciousness 'unicyclist' who scatter-posts
    incoherant ravings. Benign enough, and sometimes amusing. Then
    there's the mystery
    cut & paster. What digs? I don't know the history of a.b well enough
    to
    have seen what tripped these loons (if indeed they're multiple loons
    or just invocations of the same loon?) off? I can't be bothered going
    through
    the headers and tracking them down, not worth the effort.

    What happened way back when that
    attracted the loon(s)? If it's one person, that person must have a
    hell of
    a lot of spare time to spend on this pointless obsession. There's a
    lot
    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

    Nah. Just nutters. There aint no reason. And if there were would you
    not start to feel a little uneasy about your own grasp on reality if
    you understood it?

    Its just static.

    Dave

  6. ritcho said:
    Bleve said:


    [snip]

    There's a
    lot
    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

    Never argue with a fool - they drag you down to their level and then
    beat you with experience. 🙂

    Ritch

    And that is so so so true. Sometimes associating with em can kill you.
    Why I dont ever go shooting with cops anymore

    Dave

  7. Resound said:

    "Bleve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've been around USENET for a -long- time (with a few holidays whilst
    between good/reliable newsfeeds). Used a lot of newsgroups, seen a lot

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for
    just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history
    lessons for me?

    As far as I can make out, Bratton is also the cut and paste troll. He's
    basically a sad git someqhere in California who's most likely on some form
    of mental disability pension and who's discovered that this internet thingy
    can be used to get attention if you're obnoxious enough. He tends to find
    one person and latch on obsessively for a while. Marty is just the latest.

    Stream of consciousness unicycle boy is a fairly new thing. He's been around
    for a little while but he used to post once a week rather once or twice a
    day. I think that was occasioned by the fact that his website hosting
    disappeared.


    I think he thinks he is some sort of missunderstood genius. 🙂

    Our overall troll level in terms of individual trolls is pretty

    Quoted message said:

    low. There was a spate for a while when some of the rowdier elements in some
    motorist groups got bored and decided to come and flame us,

    They aint doing that this month. The price of petrol must really be
    hurting.
    BTW Kathy had an exam on friday. It was the last day of her holidays and
    her boss wanted her certifications current (dont start me on this)
    Anyway we took stealth motorcycle. Its been what a month and a half
    since it was started and the last time I filled it it cost $1.15 litre.
    So i fired it up It ran for a minute and went onto 2 cyclinders. I put
    it on prime and it went back onto 4. I found a can of something that
    used to be petrol and put just under a litre into it. It went back onto
    2 cyclinders (but not any consistent 2) and we rode it to the servo. I
    can now confirm than it now costs 23 bucks to fill orange kat up at 1.25
    litre . Hopefully this lasts a few months 🙂

    but other than

    Quoted message said:

    that, it's mostly Roger.


    Who I am sure is a warm happy guy with a loving gf 🙂

  8. Bleve said:

    What happened way back when that attracted the loon(s)?

    One too many rides without a helmet?
    </Godwin>
    --
    Dave Hughes | [email hidden]
    The trick to flying is to throw yourself at the ground and miss -
    Douglas Adams

  9. Random Data said:
    Bleve said:

    What happened way back when that attracted the loon(s)?

    One too many rides without a helmet?
    </Godwin>

    It's a bit early for that one 🙂

  10. [quote="Bleve"]

    Quoted post said:

    There's a lot of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a reason for just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or history lessons for me?



    Its the same mentality we had to put up with on 27 mhz CB Radio and Ham Radio. Carrier droppers, tune upers, unidentified inane comments or just constant interferrence.

    I think that sometimes its ppl who dont agree with an opinion and are not articulate enough to put 3 words together to say they disagree. Just tell myself that the sheltered workshop has shut and these poor sad buggers are entertaining themselves till they go back tomorrow.

    Never argue with an Idiot.
    He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience. .... And, you will usually end up looking like a bigger idiot!

    Just ignore them, they wont go away but they wont get a spotlight on them either. I often avoid threads started by ppl who are not members of cyclingforums, might look at them on usenet and often my suspicions were right. Long threads of [censored] by ppl who are not interested in bikes.

    Sometimes it can be hard to tell if someone is wasting the groups time or genuinely wants a "day 1 week 1" question answered.

    You always have the option or reporting them to their provider. On usenet, assuming you use Outlook Express, highlight message, right click, click properties, click details, click message source. Highlight everything in the message, right click, copy, close lots of stuff and open a new email message, paste the offensive or abusive message in the body. Look through the message for something like "X-Complaints-To: [email hidden]" and thats who you sent the email off to with your complaint about the poor moron who posted it. Hotmail, google and yahoo do follow up all complaints. There are "anonomysers" used by some ppl but they dont argue if asked to hand over a pests info.
    ISP's will normally suspend the account and the silly bugger forefits the balance of their fee and has to find a new server.
    There is lots of "who from" info attached to messages by the host prog and the ISP. Ya cant stop it and if you own the server or are on broadband its even easier to trace.

    There I go again, long rambling reply to an OT thread 😄

    Cheers
    Hugh

  11. HughMann said:


    Just ignore them, they wont go away but they wont get a spotlight on them either. I often avoid threads started by ppl who are not members of cyclingforums, might look at them on usenet and often my suspicions were right. Long threads of [censored] by ppl who are not interested in bikes.

    Correct. Treat with ignore.

  12. HughMann said:
    Bleve said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>There's a lot of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a

    reason for just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or
    history lessons for me?> >

    Its the same mentality we had to put up with on 27 mhz CB Radio and
    Ham Radio. Carrier droppers, tune upers, unidentified inane comments
    or just constant interferrence.

    I think that sometimes its ppl who dont agree with an opinion and are
    not articulate enough to put 3 words together to say they disagree.
    Just tell myself that the sheltered workshop has shut and these poor
    sad buggers are entertaining themselves till they go back tomorrow.

    Never argue with an Idiot.
    He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience.
    .... And, you will usually end up looking like a bigger idiot!

    Just ignore them, they wont go away but they wont get a spotlight on
    them either. I often avoid threads started by ppl who are not
    members of cyclingforums, might look at them on usenet and often my
    suspicions were right. Long threads of [censored] by ppl who are not
    interested in bikes.

    Sometimes it can be hard to tell if someone is wasting the groups
    time or genuinely wants a "day 1 week 1" question answered.

    You always have the option or reporting them to their provider. On
    usenet, assuming you use Outlook Express, highlight message, right
    click, click properties, click details, click message source.
    Highlight everything in the message, right click, copy, close lots of
    stuff and open a new email message, paste the offensive or abusive
    message in the body. Look through the message for something like
    "X-Complaints-To: [email hidden]" and thats who you sent the
    email off to with your complaint about the poor moron who posted it.
    Hotmail, google and yahoo do follow up all complaints. There are
    "anonomysers" used by some ppl but they dont argue if asked to hand
    over a pests info.
    ISP's will normally suspend the account and the silly bugger forefits
    the balance of their fee and has to find a new server.
    There is lots of "who from" info attached to messages by the host
    prog and the ISP. Ya cant stop it and if you own the server or are
    on broadband its even easier to trace.

    There I go again, long rambling reply to an OT thread 😄

    Cheers
    Hugh

    You can choose to ignore it or you can do something about it. The
    choices are yours. The numbers of Brattons local police are on his
    website, why don't you give 'em a call. The hard works already been
    done. If you don't fight for your freedom you're almost certain to lose
    it. Tamyka and Lotte are the only ones with balls in this newsgroup. The
    choice is yours. Bratton can stop anytime, but he's too weak, he's like
    a moth drawn to the flame, and soon he'll burn.

    How did I deal with the CB nonsense? I got a Full Call license.

    VK6ABC

  13. God said:
    HughMann said:
    Bleve said:

    >>> There's a lot of nuts out there ... but why are they here? There's a
    >
    >
    > reason for just about every piece of human behaviour. Any clues or
    > history lessons for me?> >

    Its the same mentality we had to put up with on 27 mhz CB Radio and
    Ham Radio. Carrier droppers, tune upers, unidentified inane comments
    or just constant interferrence.

    I think that sometimes its ppl who dont agree with an opinion and are
    not articulate enough to put 3 words together to say they disagree.
    Just tell myself that the sheltered workshop has shut and these poor
    sad buggers are entertaining themselves till they go back tomorrow.

    Never argue with an Idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then
    beat you with experience.
    .... And, you will usually end up looking like a bigger idiot!

    Just ignore them, they wont go away but they wont get a spotlight on
    them either. I often avoid threads started by ppl who are not
    members of cyclingforums, might look at them on usenet and often my
    suspicions were right. Long threads of [censored] by ppl who are not
    interested in bikes.

    Sometimes it can be hard to tell if someone is wasting the groups
    time or genuinely wants a "day 1 week 1" question answered.

    You always have the option or reporting them to their provider. On
    usenet, assuming you use Outlook Express, highlight message, right
    click, click properties, click details, click message source.
    Highlight everything in the message, right click, copy, close lots of
    stuff and open a new email message, paste the offensive or abusive
    message in the body. Look through the message for something like
    "X-Complaints-To: [email hidden]" and thats who you sent the
    email off to with your complaint about the poor moron who posted it.
    Hotmail, google and yahoo do follow up all complaints. There are
    "anonomysers" used by some ppl but they dont argue if asked to hand
    over a pests info.
    ISP's will normally suspend the account and the silly bugger forefits
    the balance of their fee and has to find a new server. There is lots
    of "who from" info attached to messages by the host
    prog and the ISP. Ya cant stop it and if you own the server or are
    on broadband its even easier to trace.
    There I go again, long rambling reply to an OT thread 😄
    Cheers
    Hugh

    You can choose to ignore it or you can do something about it. The
    choices are yours. The numbers of Brattons local police are on his
    website, why don't you give 'em a call. The hard works already been
    done. If you don't fight for your freedom you're almost certain to lose
    it. Tamyka and Lotte are the only ones with balls in this newsgroup. The
    choice is yours. Bratton can stop anytime, but he's too weak, he's like
    a moth drawn to the flame, and soon he'll burn.

    How did I deal with the CB nonsense? I got a Full Call license.

    VK6ABC


    God has spoken, and given the women of this group sex change operations
    by the sounds of it.
    Can we now go back to bikes?

    How about this: ever tried to cycle through peak hour CBD traffic with
    your saddle spinning around behind you as the seatpost bolt has
    departed? All that stop-start traffic and no sitting down. legs ache
    after that. Had worse (and Tamyka this question doesn't include a
    botched sex change operation, only bike stuff)?? Tall stories permitted.

  14. cfsmtb said:
    HughMann said:


    Just ignore them, they wont go away but they wont get a spotlight on
    them either. I often avoid threads started by ppl who are not members
    of cyclingforums, might look at them on usenet and often my suspicions
    were right. Long threads of [censored] by ppl who are not interested in
    bikes.

    Correct. Treat with ignore.

    Of course, I wasn't asking how to deal with trolls (I'm no
    newbie...I used to administer NNTP servers before most of you
    had heard of the innanet), I was asking about the (seemingly) high
    incidence
    of them here and if there's some history or provocation (*something*
    has to trigger the sort of loony behaviour that goes on!) that
    happened before I was paying attention to a.b.

  15. This was exactly the same thought I had. DRS leaves and all these
    loonys appear. Co-incidence?

    --
    Brett"Top posted deliberately 'cause I don't use OE"S

    flyingdutch said:

    everyone rides a bike at some stage?

    Gee, I almost miss DRS. At least he got your blood flowing. the rest
    are just a waste of time...

    F"doesnt really miss DRS"Dutch

  16. Scott said:

    <blububub>

    speaking of trolls ... 🙄 🙄

  17. DD said:


    God has spoken, and given the women of this group sex change operations
    by the sounds of it.

    Bloody hope not. I like having t*ts & all the other fun stuff.

    Interesting though, how the vast majority of the troll posts seem to *disappear* if you're reading via cyclingforums. Funny that.

    a.b troll precis: someone picked on someone else, someone else stuck up for them, so the someone doing the picking on decided to pick on them too. And the original someone (from the US) is now legally in deep [censored].

    Now I'm off to fiddle around with some bike-related stuff. One hour 'til UCI MTB Champs in SBS. tootle-pips.

  18. quote='Bleve'cfsmtb said:
    HughMann said:


    Just ignore them, > >

    Correct. Treat with ignore.


    Sniped

    Of course, I wasn't asking how to deal with trolls (I'm no
    newbie...I used to administer NNTP servers before most of you
    had heard of the innanet), [/QUOTE]

    Good to see that someone else has some computing experience too. Mine goes back to 1200 baud comms accross the country, punch cards, washing machine 67mb drives and long forgotten fortran. First used "Internet" predecessor at RMC in 1982 with accoustic coupled modem. Please dont send me back there 😄

    Problem with this sort of conversation is that you cant see the other persons body language or hear the voice inflection. Was in no way attempting to teach egg sucking but I bet that at least one newbie out there has read how ppl here deal with trolls.

    Now .... off to find a thread to do some top posting

    Cheers 😄

    Hugh

  19. HughMann said:

    Now .... off to find a thread to do some top posting

    Yes, the tried and true DRS 'Summoning Ritual'. Hasn't worked of late though. 😄

  20. HughMann said:
    Bleve said:
    cfsmtb said:

    HughMann Wrote:
    >
    > Just ignore them, > >

    Correct. Treat with ignore.


    Sniped

    Of course, I wasn't asking how to deal with trolls (I'm no
    newbie...I used to administer NNTP servers before most of you
    had heard of the innanet),

    Good to see that someone else has some computing experience too. Mine
    goes back to 1200 baud comms accross the country, punch cards, washing
    machine 67mb drives and long forgotten fortran. First used "Internet"
    predecessor at RMC in 1982 with accoustic coupled modem. Please dont
    send me back there 😄

    Heh, did you ever see the GUI punchcard simulator? this one
    always makes me laugh! :

    Back on FORTRAN, on the very first workstation I encountered, I
    suggested a
    useful set of tools to make the old FORTRAN folk feel at home. A
    window that
    emulated an 80 column card, and a cursor that emulated a manual hole
    punch
    (left mouse button). Version 1 had the right button doing an "un-punch
    hole"
    but that seemed too friendly and unrealistic. Version 2 had right mouse
    tearing the card in half and dumping it in the trash (and no, I hadn't
    seen
    a Mac then--). A friend suggested that middle mouse should do the "glue
    chad
    back in hole, I'm desparate" trick, with a 95% failure rate. Once you
    had a
    stack of these on screen, another little icon would expand to be a card
    reader.
    On pressing the button, the cards would snap across the screen, and
    through
    the reader. Naturally, for maximum effect, every tenth one would get
    bent and
    stuck.
    -- [email hidden] (Keith Oborn)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.