UK and Europe · Public discussion

[OT] Should I install Service Pack 2?

Started by [ Not Responding ] · · Last activity · 28 posts · 953 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
25 September 2004
Last activity
27 September 2004
Original author
[ Not Responding ]
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
953
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    It's almost enough to make me install one of the alternatives.

    Any comments from anyone?

  2. "[ Not Responding ]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    It's almost enough to make me install one of the alternatives.

    Any comments from anyone?

    I did it this morning. Took about an hour (broadband).Seems to be working at
    the moment. Only moan (so far) is that if you view messages in Outlook
    Express as text only, you can't alter the text size of the messages,
    microsoft choose a size and tough if you'd like to change it. Bizzarre.

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  3. Not Responding said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.


    I got the CD and installed it at home last weekend. Downloaded it from
    the microsoft site for work. Apart from a nag screen about updating
    the virus checking I have not noticed any other problems.

    Cheers
    Richard
    Please remove THIS if replying

  4. On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:12:11 +0100, "[ Not Responding ]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    Don't worry, it's hardly [censored] at all.

    Quoted message said:

    It's almost enough to make me install one of the alternatives.

    A much better idea, of course :-)

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  5. Tumbleweed said:

    "[ Not Responding ]" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's
    just that everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up
    with only partial functionality returned to me. I always keep
    up to date with patches but I'm dead nervous about something
    as fundamental as SP2. It's almost enough to make me install one of the
    alternatives.

    Any comments from anyone?

    I did it this morning. Took about an hour (broadband).Seems to
    be working at the moment. Only moan (so far) is that if you
    view messages in Outlook Express as text only, you can't alter
    the text size of the messages, microsoft choose a size and
    tough if you'd like to change it. Bizzarre.

    I did it from the CD last week but I don't have a problem with text size.
    --
    Mark

    1x1 wheel, 3x2 wheels & 1x3 wheels.

  6. "the.Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tumbleweed said:

    "[ Not Responding ]" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's
    just that everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up
    with only partial functionality returned to me. I always keep
    up to date with patches but I'm dead nervous about something
    as fundamental as SP2. It's almost enough to make me install one of the
    alternatives.

    Any comments from anyone?

    I did it this morning. Took about an hour (broadband).Seems to
    be working at the moment. Only moan (so far) is that if you
    view messages in Outlook Express as text only, you can't alter
    the text size of the messages, microsoft choose a size and
    tough if you'd like to change it. Bizzarre.

    I did it from the CD last week but I don't have a problem with text size.

    That might be because you havent tried to change it!

    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2email.mspx

    "What works differently?

    The following Outlook Express features are not available when running in
    plain text mode:

    .. Changing text size to a larger or smaller font.

    .. Full text searching through the body of a mail message."

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  7. Not Responding said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    No, install Mac OS X. It's much better. Or Linux, if you don't feel like
    having a new computer to go with it.

    Daniele
    --
    Apple Juice Ltd
    Chapter Arts Centre
    Market Road www.apple-juice.co.uk
    Cardiff CF5 1QE 029 2019 0140

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (D.M. Procida) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me

    Oh dear. Divorce the [censored]!

    Quoted message said:

    to do it for some time now. It's just that

    Quoted message said:

    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with

    A nasty virus-bourne disease?

    Quoted message said:

    only partial

    Quoted message said:

    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    No, install Mac OS X. It's much better. Or Linux, if you don't feel like
    having a new computer to go with it.

    That's pretty fundamental too. But either of those options leads to a
    serene and trouble-free future, where the computer is your servant instead
    of a nagging master.

    --
    Nick Kew

    Alex Salmond - thank you for saying the obvious. Can you repeat what
    James VI did, for us poor sassenachs with no acceptable leaders?

  9. Tumbleweed said:

    "the.Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tumbleweed said:

    "[ Not Responding ]" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    >Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's
    >just that everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up
    >with only partial functionality returned to me. I always keep
    >up to date with patches but I'm dead nervous about something
    >as fundamental as SP2. It's almost enough to make me install one of the
    >alternatives.
    >
    >Any comments from anyone?

    I did it this morning. Took about an hour (broadband).Seems to
    be working at the moment. Only moan (so far) is that if you
    view messages in Outlook Express as text only, you can't alter
    the text size of the messages, microsoft choose a size and
    tough if you'd like to change it. Bizzarre.

    I did it from the CD last week but I don't have a problem with text size.

    That might be because you havent tried to change it!

    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2email.mspx

    "What works differently?

    The following Outlook Express features are not available when running in
    plain text mode:

    . Changing text size to a larger or smaller font.

    . Full text searching through the body of a mail message."


    I have opted out of OE completely and am using Mozilla Thunderbird. Free
    download at:
    http://www.mozilla.org
    Much better than OE and has some good filtering built in. Course I have
    also dumped IE and am using Firefox as well. Oh and I installed Sp2 two
    weeks ago without a hitch.

    Stan (Smug, Me!) Cox

  10. you know? said:

    On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:12:11 +0100, "[ Not Responding ]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    Don't worry, it's hardly [censored] at all.

    OK. Here goes.

    "I may be some time"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's almost enough to make me install one of the alternatives.

    A much better idea, of course :-)

    Guy

  11. "Stan Cox" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    <snip>>>

    Quoted message said:

    I have opted out of OE completely and am using Mozilla Thunderbird. Free
    download at:
    http://www.mozilla.org
    Much better than OE and has some good filtering built in. Course I have
    also dumped IE and am using Firefox as well. Oh and I installed Sp2 two
    weeks ago without a hitch.

    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message (seemed
    to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very crappy. Didnt
    try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP anyway?

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  12. Tumbleweed said:

    Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP anyway?

    I use Thunderbird on XP and I've never had that problem.

    d.

  13. Tumbleweed said:


    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message (seemed
    to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very crappy. Didnt
    try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP anyway?

    Does that fine here: Thunderbird 0.6 & Firefox 1.0 pre-release (lovely)
    on RH Fedora Core 1

    Paul M

  14. In message <[email hidden]>, Tumbleweed
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    "Stan Cox" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    <snip>>>

    Quoted message said:

    I have opted out of OE completely and am using Mozilla Thunderbird. Free
    download at:
    http://www.mozilla.org
    Much better than OE and has some good filtering built in. Course I have
    also dumped IE and am using Firefox as well. Oh and I installed Sp2 two
    weeks ago without a hitch.

    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message (seemed
    to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very crappy. Didnt
    try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP anyway?

    I moved to Netscape 7 after IE began loading huge movie files
    automatically and pop ups were coming in from all over the place.

    But lately Netscape has tended to exit unexpectedly, so I've changed
    again to Mozilla Firefox. It will import both Netscape bookmarked links
    and IE favourites.

    I also use Turnpike from Demon, which allows me to choose which browser
    opens up links in emails and news posts.

    --
    congokid
    Good restaurants in London? Number one on Google
    http://congokid.com

  15. Tumbleweed said:

    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it
    wouldnt launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news
    message (seemed to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the
    link. Very crappy. Didnt try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does
    it work on Windows XP anyway?

    I don't think it was ever a problem on Windows, and I believe it's been
    fixed on the various Linux distros.

    --
    Keith Willoughby http://flat222.org/keith/
    I took the bus from Balmbras
    And she was heavy laden

  16. Paul M said:
    Tumbleweed said:


    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it
    wouldnt launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news
    message (seemed to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link.
    Very crappy. Didnt try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it
    work on Windows XP anyway?

    Does that fine here: Thunderbird 0.6 & Firefox 1.0 pre-release (lovely)
    on RH Fedora Core 1

    Paul M


    The Firefox Pre release has moved things on a lot and is a great
    improvement on Ie and previous versions of Firefox. I think your
    problem may have had some messed up "default broweser" settings.
    Definately not a problem now.

    Stan Cox

    P.s. Installed it at work. If the techies find out most of our office
    have gone over to it there will be hell to pay 🙂

  17. Tumbleweed <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    : launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message (seemed
    : to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very crappy. Didnt
    : try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP anyway?

    This seems to be a common problem. It's easy enough to fix on Linux - let
    me know if you want the details.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  18. Not Responding said:
    you know? said:

    On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:12:11 +0100, "[ Not Responding ]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Windows has been nagging me to do it for some time now. It's just that
    everytime I muck around with Microsoft OSs I end up with only partial
    functionality returned to me. I always keep up to date with patches
    but I'm dead nervous about something as fundamental as SP2.

    Don't worry, it's hardly [censored] at all.

    OK. Here goes.

    "I may be some time"

    Well, mission accomplished.

    To the extent that MS Office runs and the internet is connected
    through a h/w firewall router thing.

  19. "Paul M" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tumbleweed said:


    I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message
    (seemed to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very
    crappy. Didnt try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on
    Windows XP anyway?

    Does that fine here: Thunderbird 0.6 & Firefox 1.0 pre-release (lovely) on
    RH Fedora Core 1

    Paul M

    Maybe a setup issue then? TBird 0.8 IIRC. red hat AS 3.1 Firefox but dont
    recall which version, not on that system at the mo.

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  20. "Arthur Clune" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tumbleweed <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I had an issue with Thunderbird (on Linux) a few months ago, it wouldnt
    : launch a browser direct from a URL within an email or news message
    (seemed
    : to be a 'feature'😉, you had to cut and paste the link. Very crappy.
    Didnt
    : try it on Windows. Is that fixed now or does it work on Windows XP
    anyway?

    This seems to be a common problem. It's easy enough to fix on Linux - let
    me know if you want the details.

    Arthur

    Thanks, can you send me a URL or a howto or whatever? Maybe I should also
    look at downloadinga newer version. I did spend some time trying to fix it
    but gave up, it seemed pretty lame it didnt just work first time. As a Linux
    newbie it just seemed too hard to fix for something so basic.

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.