General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT Same-sex Education! Outrageous!

Started by Stark Raven · · Last activity · 22 posts · 762 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 March 2004
Last activity
15 March 2004
Original author
Stark Raven
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
762
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. the administration would bring this matter up in education. It's simply insane, especially in an
    election year. What will we be teaching our precious children next??

  2. This looks like a troll.

    regards, Ben

    --
    "What passes for wisdom may only be eloquent foolishness"

    Cheap long distance calling using Onesuite (onesuite.comonesuite.com).
    2.5 cents/min anywhere in the U.S., to Canada or the U.K. No monthly or connection fees! Use
    promotional code 038664643 for 20 free minutes.

  3. Stark Raven said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Jill

  4. jmcquown said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Quoted message said:

    Jill

    better in the math and sciences than they do when they're sitting in classes with boys. Not sure if
    it benefits the boys or not, but can imagine it might help them focus too? Goomba

  5. Goomba38 said:
    jmcquown said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Jill

    Quoted message said:

    better in the math and sciences than they do when they're sitting in classes with boys. Not sure
    if it benefits the boys or not, but can imagine it might help them focus too? Goomba

    Yup. And the dress would probably be toned *way* down as well. I go past a local high school on my
    way home from work and can't believe some of

    impress?

    --
    Steve

    Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it.

  6. Goomba38 said:

    doing much better in the math and sciences than they do when they're sitting in classes with boys.

    Why is this the government's concern, as opposed to the parents'?

    --
    John Gaughan johngaughan.netjohngaughan.net [email hidden]

  7. ben wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This looks like a troll.

    "Sharks are the only fish that can blink their eyes simultaneously".

    --
    Best Greg

  8. "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Quoted message said:


    Jill

    basically the way exclusive private schools as well as many parochial schools have operated in the
    past and in some cases still do operate. All boys schools or all girls schools. It's an attempt to
    promote less hostile ducation environments for some children

  9. In article <[email hidden]>, jmcquown

    Quoted message said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Quoted message said:


    Jill


    I don't either. I just don't think they should be teaching it in school.

  10. Stark Raven said:


    In article <[email hidden]>, jmcquown

    Quoted message said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding HIV and AIDS to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Jill


    I don't either. I just don't think they should be teaching it in school.

    If you had read beyond the headline, you'd have doscovered

    either all girls or all boys. It has nothing at all to do with teaching about intercourse.

    gloria p

  11. "Stark Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    the administration would bring this matter up in education. It's simply
    insane, especially in an election year. What will we be teaching our precious
    children next??

    To invade third world countries on the pretense of finding "weapons of mass
    destruction"? Covering up the breasts on a sculpture? Addressing the UN by saying
    "now the left hand (while holding up the right hand) knows what the right hand
    (while holding up the left hand) is doing"? Grabbing a piece of chalk from a
    child and placing an "e" on the end of "potato"? Wow, Republicans are such great
    role models.

    are pretty repellant, if you ever take the time to notice the little [censored]
    while in line at the A&P.

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, Puester

    Quoted message said:
    Stark Raven said:


    In article
    <[email hidden]>, jmcquown

    Quoted message said:

    Stark Raven wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > the administration would bring this matter up in
    > education

    Why not? Education is key to everything from avoiding
    HIV and AIDS to avoiding all too prevalent teen
    pregnancy. I have no problem with same

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Jill


    I don't either. I just don't think they should be
    teaching it in school.

    If you had read beyond the headline, you'd have doscovered

    Quoted message said:

    either all girls or all boys. It has nothing at all to do
    with teaching about intercourse.

    gloria p

    Oh. Ah . . nevermind.

  13. Laura wrote:

    -Bob

  14. to the person who pointed out the grammatical problems with
    my statement. I

    --
    Laura

    GAYLAN FOR PRESIDENT

    I am a proud member of the mercury amalgam lyme antibiotic
    incest multiple sclerosis fiboromylagia vaccination
    survivors group. <troll trap>

    "Laura" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    an

    Quoted message said:

    were studies done of the benefits of such when I was of
    the age to be affected by this type of choice.

    I recall only one of the findings - that all girls schools
    were beneficial to some girls (at some specific age
    perhaps) because they were over


    powered

    Quoted message said:

    by boys so to speak because they were not as aggressive as
    boys often


    times

    Quoted message said:

    and in an all girl environment were able to develop
    stronger leadership skills and become more aggressive..
    This may have been a phenomena


    specific

    Quoted message said:

    to catholic schools (where some of the elementary schools
    30 years ago


    were

    Quoted message said:

    intent on turning out perfect little ladies)

    --
    Laura

    GAYLAN FOR PRESIDENT

    I am a proud member of the mercury amalgam lyme antibiotic
    incest multiple sclerosis fiboromylagia vaccination
    survivors group. <troll trap>

    "Kswck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "PENMART01" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040306112636.18241.00000991@mb-
    m06.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:

    gloria p boasts:
    >> If you had read beyond the headline, you'd have
    >> doscovered

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> either all girls or all boys. It has nothing at all
    >> to do with teaching about intercourse.
    >>
    >> gloria p

    it's

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about

    Quoted message said:

    just teaching "getting along" then there's no need to
    discriminate by


    demanding

    Quoted message said:

    about

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    then you should have no problem submitting to being
    surgically


    neutered...

    Quoted message said:

    oh,

    Quoted message said:

    you already have. hehe

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    thing

    Quoted message said:

    is that the REAL distinction never ever gets
    addressed... not PC.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    can never ever be Gay Men or Women... they are Gay
    Males or Females


    only

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (see

    Quoted message said:

    "gender grouping" by gloria p).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "men/women"

    Quoted message said:

    either but being gay absolutely precludes the
    "man/woman" designation.


    There

    Quoted message said:

    is nothing whatsoever manly or womanly about
    gays/gayness... and from


    all

    Quoted message said:

    I've

    Quoted message said:

    encountered I have serious doubts they qualify as 100%
    human... they


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    self

    Quoted message said:

    centered creatures who exhibit no humanity
    whatsoever... their entire


    reason

    Quoted message said:

    for being is in constantly seeking and participating
    in abnormal


    behaviour... I

    Quoted message said:

    guess getting a tattoo or a piercing ain't enough of a
    statement that


    they're

    Quoted message said:

    different... they gotta shove hard rubber sticks and
    other similar


    paraphenalia

    Quoted message said:

    (including rodents) up each other's bodily orifices,
    and that ain't


    nothing to

    simply

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    indicative of a severe psychosis.

    I think the real fear here is a naive public. Many folks
    believe that


    gay

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    men and women do nothing more than screw in public, and
    do so for the


    shock

    Quoted message said:

    value. The gay-bashers have decided quite arbitrarily
    that if gays are


    not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    like them, they are sickos and should have their heads
    beaten in.

    Quoted message said:

    those

    Quoted message said:

    who do are actually asking to get beat up. I have
    friends who are gay


    (men

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    what some media would have you believe, they do not have
    two heads, walk around with a limp wrist in the air and
    try to seduce anyone and everyone-nor do they introduce
    themselves as " Hi, I'm Randy and I'm


    gay,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    sweet stuff".

    People who watch television and see the gay parades in
    San Francisco or


    go

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to the Halloween parade in NYC assume that this type of
    behavior is


    normal

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    among gays.Mom and Pop in the bible belt would see
    this and


    automatically

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    condemn all gays as 'abnormal' and try to have them
    banned, jailed, institutionalized, etc.

    What's next, the thought police?


  15. projectile vomit chick said:

    are pretty repellant, if you ever take the time to notice
    the little [censored] while in line at the A&P.


    yes, but most of them grow up to be repellent big [censored].

    your pal, blake

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "projectile vomit chick" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    God made them that way so their parents wouldn't drown them.

    :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Most of them are pretty repellant, if you ever take
    the time to notice the little [censored] while in line
    at the A&P.

    I love watching the little kids in line at the supermarket.
    It's my favorite form of entertainment there, other than
    checking out the women.

    --
    Dan Abel Sonoma State University AIS [email hidden]

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "projectile vomit chick" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    God made them that way so their parents wouldn't drown them.

    :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Most of them are pretty repellant, if you ever take
    the time to notice the little [censored] while in line
    at the A&P.

    I love watching the little kids in line at the supermarket.
    It's my favorite form of entertainment there, other than
    checking out the women.

    --
    Dan Abel Sonoma State University AIS [email hidden]

  18. Laura said:

    were studies done of the benefits of such when I was of the
    age to be affected by this type of choice.

    I recall only one of the findings - that all girls schools
    were beneficial to some girls (at some specific age
    perhaps) because they were over powered by boys so to speak
    because they were not as aggressive as boys often times and
    in an all girl environment were able to develop stronger
    leadership skills and become more aggressive.. This may
    have been a phenomena specific to catholic schools (where
    some of the elementary schools 30 years ago were intent on
    turning out perfect little ladies)

    as i see it, the principle mistake was teaching woman how to
    read. things have gone remarkably downhill since then.

    your pal, blake

  19. On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:01:00 -0600, zxcvbob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Laura wrote:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    -Bob

    ...but not as often as they'd like. it's a [censored], ain't it?

    your pal, blake

  20. Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 21:30:52 GMT, "Laura"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    an

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    were studies done of the benefits of such when I was of
    the age to be affected by this type of choice.

    The biggest benefit is that the boys are not looking
    lustily at the blossoming girls all day. When they have to
    stand up they can then do so and not need to hide the front
    of their pants. Ed

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.