General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: recent ballistics tests

Started by WillBrink · · Last activity · 22 posts · 2,208 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 May 2005
Last activity
6 May 2005
Original author
WillBrink
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,208
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, and, I'm thinking about getting a much smaller, throw in the
    pocket type handgun. I'll probably have to choose a smaller caliber
    for that i.e. .38 special or .380.

    I would have said no way a few years ago, but now Speer makes .38 ammo
    designed for short barrels (ala .38 snub) with decent ballistics.

    Thing is, as you note elsewhere: The smaller pistol you have with you
    is far more likely to be effective than the big one you leave
    behind. Should I decide to carry, my plan has always been to go with
    the Sig P232. The .380 wouldn't be my first choice, but it is
    relatively respectable for its size, the P323 has an established
    track record, and its slim profile, with its single-stack mag, will
    go quite comfortably in a waste-band carry, belly bag, you-name-it.

    --
    Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
    WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
    spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
    [email hidden] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Runs With Knives) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, and, I'm thinking about getting a much smaller, throw in the
    pocket type handgun. I'll probably have to choose a smaller caliber
    for that i.e. .38 special or .380.

    I would have said no way a few years ago, but now Speer makes .38 ammo
    designed for short barrels (ala .38 snub) with decent ballistics.

    Thing is, as you note elsewhere: The smaller pistol you have with you
    is far more likely to be effective than the big one you leave
    behind. Should I decide to carry, my plan has always been to go with
    the Sig P232. The .380 wouldn't be my first choice, but it is
    relatively respectable for its size, the P323 has an established
    track record, and its slim profile, with its single-stack mag, will
    go quite comfortably in a waste-band carry, belly bag, you-name-it.

    Actually, there are many guns out there smaller then the P232 that fire
    real SD rounds, such as the Kahr K or MK series in 9mm, .40. and now
    ..45. There is no reason for the p232 with so many good sub compacts out
    there with far better ballistics and weigh less then that Sig. HK,
    Glock, Kahr, etc. all have sub compact light guns. See:

    http://www.kahr.com/front.html

    Way better choice then the Sig232.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.