General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: Outdoor Photography

Started by sandy saunders · · Last activity · 6 posts · 116 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 March 2007
Last activity
31 March 2007
Original author
sandy saunders
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
116
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Some postings ago, there was a post regarding a petition on the Government
    website against proposed restrictions on photography outdoors. Being a keen
    walker and lots of outdoor photography, I e-signed. Below is the contents
    of an email I received yesterday from '10 Downing Street' .......... the
    system works!

    "E-Petition: response from the Government

    Thank you for signing the petition on the Downing Street website calling for
    the Prime Minister to stop proposed restrictions on photography in public
    places.

    This petition has already attracted over 60,000 signatures from people who
    obviously share your concern. Not surprisingly, the idea that the Government
    might be poised to restrict your ability to take photos has caused some
    puzzlement and even alarm.

    We have therefore decided to respond to this petition before its closing
    date of August, in order to reassure people.

    The Government appreciates that millions of people in this country enjoy
    photography. So we have checked carefully to see if any Government
    department was considering any proposal that might possibly lead to the sort
    of restrictions suggested by this petition. We have been assured this is not
    the case.

    There may be cases where individual schools or other bodies believe it is
    necessary to have some restrictions on photography, for instance to protect
    children, but that would be a matter for local decisions.

    In fact, Simon Taylor, who started the petition, has since made clear that
    he was not really referring to Government action or legislation. His main
    concern appears to be that photographic societies and other organisations
    may introduce voluntary ID cards for members to help them explain why they
    are taking photographs. Again, any such scheme would not involve the
    Government.

    We hope this re-assures you and clears up the confusion."

    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk
    'Mountains or Mole Hills, summiting
    still brings the same excitement!'

  2. sandy saunders said:

    The Government appreciates that millions of people in this country enjoy
    photography. So we have checked carefully to see if any Government
    department was considering any proposal that might possibly lead to the sort
    of restrictions suggested by this petition. We have been assured this is not
    the case.

    sort of works, was there ever any threat?
    --
    Mike Reid
    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
    is that good men do nothing" Burke

  3. Quoted message said:

    sort of works, was there ever any threat?

    Reading the email, not real threat. Like lots of popular issues, they can
    soon take on a completely different meaning to the original statement.

    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk
    'Mountains or Mole Hills, summiting
    still brings the same excitement!'

  4. The message <[email hidden]>
    from "sandy saunders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Below is the contents
    of an email I received yesterday from '10 Downing Street' .......... the
    system works!

    You haven't read the response to the on-shore windfarm petition then? :-)

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  5. Quoted message said:

    You haven't read the response to the on-shore windfarm petition then? :-)

    No ....... but I assume the response was the opposite the photography
    petition!

    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk
    'Mountains or Mole Hills, summiting
    still brings the same excitement!'

  6. The message <[email hidden]>
    from "sandy saunders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You haven't read the response to the on-shore windfarm petition then? :-)

    Quoted message said:

    No ....... but I assume the response was the opposite the photography
    petition!

    Not so much opposite as perpendicular to the petition. Apart from
    attempting to muddy the waters over subsidies there was no direct
    reference to the subject matter of the petition. Just a restatement of
    government policy and a claim that all development is subject to
    planning controls.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.