UK and Europe · Public discussion

OT, new ISP sooo slow

Started by Mark · · Last activity · 11 posts · 655 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
10 February 2004
Last activity
12 February 2004
Original author
Mark
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
655
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download speed
    on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the body for
    takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10 minutes...and that's
    on broadband!

    Any suggestions?

    TIA

    --
    Mark (MSA) This post is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may
    have occurred during transmission

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download
    speed on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the body
    for takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10 minutes...and
    that's on broadband!

    That sounds like their newsservers are slow. Did you change the news server setting when you
    moved ISP's?

    Dene

  3. In message <[email hidden]>, Mark <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download speed
    on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the body for
    takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10 minutes...and
    that's on broadband!

    I suspect it is their news server that is causing the slowness.

    You could always use a 'Proper Newsserver' that works, AKA

    <http://www.news.individual.net/>

    Alternatively, seeing as there is little benefit to just downloading the headers on broadband, you
    could just set your news reader (assuming it is an 'offline' reader) to download full postings then
    you wouldn't have to wait.
    --
    Chris French, Leeds

  4. On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:37:57 -0000, Mark <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download speed
    on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the body for
    takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10 minutes...and
    that's on broadband!

    Any suggestions?

    Are you downloading the messages, or just the message headers?

    At home my BB connection is 0.5 meg. It takes about 15 seconds to download 100 message headers and
    about a further 60 seconds to download 100 messages, with any message over 1000 lines ignored.

  5. "chris French" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You could always use a 'Proper Newsserver' that works, AKA <http://www.news.individual.net/>

    Seconded.

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Mark said:

    Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download
    speed on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the
    body for takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10
    minutes...and that's on broadband!

    Any suggestions?

    Are you downloading the messages, or just the message headers?

    At home my BB connection is 0.5 meg. It takes about 15 seconds to download 100 message headers and
    about a further 60 seconds to download 100 messages, with any message over 1000 lines ignored.

    OK, things tonight are a bit different. It looks as if they were having a bad time!

    Thanks for the news.individual recommendation though, I've sent of to register.

    Thanks everyone.

    --
    Mark (MSA) This post is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may
    have occurred during transmission

  7. mae <[email hidden]> wedi ysgrifennu:

    Quoted message said:

    OK, things tonight are a bit different. It looks as if they were having a bad time!

    Someone spilt treacle down the back of Tiscali's news server about four months ago. It just crawls
    at unbearably slow speeds for about a quarter of every day, though it's not easy to predict which
    quarter it might be on any given day. I've complained several times to their support staff but they
    don't give a flying one about usenet - take a look at the support section of the Tiscali web site
    and there's no mention of NNTP at all. The best they could come up with was something along the
    lines of "there must be a lot of traffic at the moment. Try later." which, to me, sounds too much
    like "F*** off. Usenet is dead. The Web is all that matters now. We don't care." Tossers.

    We just flipped our broadband trigger here, so I'm looking forward to using that as an excuse to
    change my ISP in a couple of months and telling Tiscali to go F*** themselves.

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for the news.individual recommendation though, I've sent of to register.

    That's where I read my news now. I don't use it to post, though, since they demand a 'proper' email
    address and I gave them one that I don't want to be spammed on. I must sort this out soon.

    --
    Rob

  8. In message <[email hidden]>, Rob Bruce <robatanalytical-
    dynamicsdotcodotyoukay@?.?.invalid> writes

    Quoted message said:

    mae <[email hidden]> wedi ysgrifennu:

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for the news.individual recommendation though, I've sent of to register.

    That's where I read my news now. I don't use it to post, though, since they demand a 'proper' email
    address and I gave them one that I don't want to be spammed on. I must sort this out soon.

    You don't have to post using the address you use to register with them.

    They do some sort of lookup on the addresses - I think they probably check for a valid domain name
    as I know people who have had posts rejected because of invalid domains, and things like using
    127.0.0.1 as the IP address

    I don't think that they actually check the actual address itself, and you could probably use someone
    else address ok until that person complained about it.
    --
    Chris French, Leeds

  9. "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I've recently signed up with Tiscali and while I am impressed with my connection and download
    speed on the web, it seems to take forever to access Usenet. Each message that I retrieve the body
    for takes around 10 seconds or more. The initial retrieval of groups took around 10 minutes...and
    that's on broadband!

    Any suggestions?

    TIA

    --
    Mark (MSA) This post is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may
    have occurred during transmission

    Bin Tiscali - they are the biggest bunch of ("*&£*"& that I have EVER had the misfortune to
    deal with..

    yes, its personal ;-)

  10. On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:51:32 -0000, in
    <[email hidden]>, "Lee"
    <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Bin Tiscali - they are the biggest bunch of ("*&£*"& that I have EVER had the misfortune to
    deal with..

    Their newspaper ads annoy me. They compare their prices to BT and ?AOL but only indicate in the
    small print that they are talking about totally different bandwidths.
    --
    DISCLAIMER: My email box is private property.Email which appears in my inbox is mine to do what I
    like with. Anything which is sent to me (whether intended or not) may, if I so desire, form a legal
    and binding contract.

  11. "Richard Bates" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Their newspaper ads annoy me. They compare their prices to BT and ?AOL but only indicate in the
    small print that they are talking about totally different bandwidths.
    --
    DISCLAIMER: My email box is private property.Email which appears in my inbox is mine to do what I
    like with. Anything which is sent to me (whether intended or not) may, if I so desire, form a
    legal and binding contract.

    Believe you me that is only the tip of the iceberg!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.