OT: ITT fine

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hey Tom you judge everyone continually. What makes you any different
than anyone else here in regard to judging people?

I judge you by what you post here. You don't like that?

You on the other hand seem to learn everything you think you know from
hit
pieces.

Everything you disagree with is "garbage", "ignorant", a "hit piece",
etc... there is NO room for any variations or uncertainty in your
fascist little world. The rest of us Know we don't know all the
answers and can only weigh the differing evidence presented by people
who do know what they are talking about.
That describes teachers, professors, scientists, philosophers, etc of
all stripes, but in your world all the ones you don't agree with are
ignorant, liberal/communist/terrorist, scumbags who are all lieing and
you almost never miss a chance to attack anyone who actually dares to
express, any chance, that things might not be black and white, or
there might be valid points on both sides, or that the current
research might possibly support differing positions.
I really do try incredibly hard to be civil, but you are an amazing
specimen. You would of made someone an incredible officer in the KGB's
Chief Border Guards Directorate, or any one of the Middle Eastern
countries "Morality Police". I have no problem picturing you and a
bunch of your "buddies" beating kids, women, whoever with nightsticks
for questioning, or deviating from the dictates.
I've got no problem with you judging me, but you are also a
complete hypocrite:
Quoted:
And it was really a joyful event to see the group of low class losers
here
acting so high and mighty as if they were in some sort of position to
measure and judge the worth of others.

This describes yourself better than anyone here, and I think everyone
here realizes the irony in you saying what you did.
You are easily the most arrogant, negative, hate filled person with
no tolerance, or respect for anyone who is different from you who
posts here IMO.
And YUP! I'm judging you based on your behavior here. Quite a few
people who post and lurk here know me in person pretty well too. I am
proud to say I'd consider everyone in that wildly divergent group a
friend and people I enjoy talking with and being around.
I really have wasted WAY too much time stating what's incredibly
obvious to everyone here, and been said, by others, over and over.

Whereas in your world you can argue that the DoD is holding back "safer"
armor from troops because someone said so.

You sure have a problem with being confronted with your own ignorance.

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Whereas in your world you can argue that the DoD is holding back "safer"
armor from troops because someone said so.

You sure have a problem with being confronted with your own ignorance.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well Tom, Unlike you I'm no expert, but the people who are say that's
what's going on. They have tons of medals like those little Bronze &
Silver Stars, little Purple Hearts, and bunches of others. The fought
in and commanded troops in direct combat to get them. They've
dedicated their lives to our military, many are War College and
Academy graduates. Now they continue to work for our troops every day,
teach military theory and history, but hey they all can't be as
informed as you are.
I definitely should bow to your superior experience, knowledge, and
objective viewpoint.

Here's another good bit that you are going to tell me isn't
happening:
http://fieldandstream.blogs.com/conservation/2007/03/all_the_preside.html
Quoted:

All The President's Men (Want To Give Away Your Hunting Land)
Last week the corruption scandals enveloping the Bush Administration
spread to the Interior Department when former assistant secretary
Stephen J. Griles admitted lying to Senate investigators probing his
ties to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Seems Griles, the former
oil, mining, and timber lobbyist President Bush put in charge of
national parks, monuments, wildlife refuges, and energy programs at
Interior, may have been steering no-bid contracts to Abramoff's
clients.

Now obviously he was actually lieing when he admitted lieing to
Congress, bwecause you have told us that NOONE in this administration
is anything but perfect.
The only reson I'm bothering with this is because I wanted an excuse
to show more people who actually give a [censored] about the environment an
article they might not see. It won't be, and hasn't been just hunting
land they are handing out.
Have a great day!
Bill C

On Mar 29, 5:18 pm, "Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Since we are way out in the weeds and you accuse me of "hits" on the
administration, here's one I'm cheering:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6508779.stm

Gates urges closure of Guantanamo

Mr Gates said the Guantanamo prison had become "tainted"
The US Defence Secretary, Robert Gates, has said that Congress should
look for ways to close the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba.
He said the military trials of terror suspects at the prison lack
credibility because they have been tainted by the harsh treatment of
detainees.
But he said that some detainees who have vowed to attack the US
should never be released from custody.
The US has started the military trials of terror suspects at
Guantanamo Bay.
Mr Gates told a House of Representatives committee that "my own
view is that because of things that happened earlier at Guantanamo
there is a taint about it."

It's about damned time, and great to see someone who understands what
"America" really is stand up for our values.
Bill C

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Whereas in your world you can argue that the DoD is holding back "safer"
armor from troops because someone said so.

You sure have a problem with being confronted with your own ignorance.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well Tom, Unlike you I'm no expert,

But here you are telling US all about it. Seems pretty much like you do
consider yourself an expert.

Bill C said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On Mar 29, 4:55 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Whereas in your world you can argue that the DoD is holding back "safer"
> armor from troops because someone said so.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,130518,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl

Medical Budget Cuts Hit
Tom Philpott | March 29, 2007
Top Docs Blast Phony Health Budget 'Efficiencies'

The surgeons general of Army, Navy and Air Force have criticized
defense officials for imposing $650 million in phony "efficiency
wedges" on their medical budgets which will not produce real
efficiencies but will only mean cuts in on-base medical services for
beneficiaries

Bill C

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Medical Budget Cuts Hit
Tom Philpott | March 29, 2007
Top Docs Blast Phony Health Budget 'Efficiencies'

The surgeons general of Army, Navy and Air Force have criticized
defense officials for imposing $650 million in phony "efficiency
wedges" on their medical budgets which will not produce real
efficiencies but will only mean cuts in on-base medical services for
beneficiaries

You know, today I did another 30 miles and now I have 867 miles for this
month alone. Counting tomorrow I'll have over 900 miles for the month while
you're reading the REAL(tm) experts and telling me that I should, like, get
really upset about all the stuff that you do.

But then you get upset about your nonstop diarhea now don't you?

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Medical Budget Cuts Hit
Tom Philpott | March 29, 2007
Top Docs Blast Phony Health Budget 'Efficiencies'

Quoted message said:

The surgeons general of Army, Navy and Air Force have criticized
defense officials for imposing $650 million in phony "efficiency
wedges" on their medical budgets which will not produce real
efficiencies but will only mean cuts in on-base medical services for
beneficiaries

You know, today I did another 30 miles and now I have 867 miles for this
month alone. Counting tomorrow I'll have over 900 miles for the month while
you're reading the REAL(tm) experts and telling me that I should, like, get
really upset about all the stuff that you do.

But then you get upset about your nonstop diarhea now don't you?

Way to reply to the actual challenge. It's typical. Glad you're
getting in lots of riding maybe it'll make you a little less angry and
nasty.
Bill C

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Way to reply to the actual challenge. It's typical. Glad you're
getting in lots of riding maybe it'll make you a little less angry and
nasty.

Riding seems to have that effect on you. I suggest you put in around 30,000
miles this year and then maybe you'll get back to the way you used to be.

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Way to reply to the actual challenge. It's typical. Glad you're
getting in lots of riding maybe it'll make you a little less angry and
nasty.

Riding seems to have that effect on you. I suggest you put in around 30,000
miles this year and then maybe you'll get back to the way you used to be.

[censored]! I used to be violent, cynical, and hostile. Don't want to go
back there.
Bill C

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Way to reply to the actual challenge. It's typical. Glad you're
getting in lots of riding maybe it'll make you a little less angry
and nasty.

Riding seems to have that effect on you. I suggest you put in around
30,000 miles this year and then maybe you'll get back to the way you
used to be.

So you're saying he'll be happier if he rides *less* than he normally
does?

--
Bill Asher

In article <[email hidden]>,

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Way to reply to the actual challenge. It's typical. Glad you're
getting in lots of riding maybe it'll make you a little less angry and
nasty.

Riding seems to have that effect on you. I suggest you put in around 30,000
miles this year and then maybe you'll get back to the way you used to be.

You are so bizarre. You claim enormous expertise in just about everything and
run down anyone who has an opinion or point of view that differs from your
child-like world view. Then you post these absurd rants that jabber about the miles
you've ridden or how many bikes you have, as if that qualifies you as an expert in
whatever was being discussed. It's incomprehensible.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?