General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT - high triglycerides in dogs

Started by Debbie Cusick · · Last activity · 32 posts · 1,571 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 September 2004
Last activity
17 September 2004
Original author
Debbie Cusick
Posts
32
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,571
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 32
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all
    getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and
    shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them,
    which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It
    *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some
    crazy numbers.

    Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of
    290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not high,
    they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet, but
    it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who
    have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their
    therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a
    very strict low-fat diet.

    My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's
    love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold
    through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the
    ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in
    all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that
    corn is a very common allergen for dogs.

    So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest their
    blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to
    heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural
    Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content
    fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the
    high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to
    to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself
    wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in
    usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about
    their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the
    350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-)

    --
    Debbie

  2. Debbie Cusick wrote:
    || Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are
    || all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly
    || checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood
    || panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of
    || indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed,
    || but the results came back with some crazy numbers.
    ||
    || Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a
    || max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those
    || are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some
    || research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of
    || the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and
    || how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have
    || found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat
    || diet.
    ||

    ?? why should a dog be on a strict low-fat diet? I can see why exercise
    would be important.

    || My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't
    || understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact
    || that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit
    || on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use
    || corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've
    || looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very
    || common allergen for dogs.

    Try LC. They probalby already eat too many carbs.

    ||
    || So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably
    || retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that,
    || untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic
    || disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just
    || about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the
    || guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end)
    || and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to
    || Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find
    || myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the
    || dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people
    || who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about
    || their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if
    || that was what my dogs had. :-)

    I don't see how rice is going to help them...and I don't see how low fat
    will be particularly healthly for them since that usually means high carb.

  3. Hi Debbie,

    Debbie Cusick said:

    Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are
    all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly
    checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood
    panel on
    them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of
    troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the
    results came back
    with some crazy numbers.

    http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp

    Input "hypercholesterolemia". Most of what I found on the 'net
    concerning high cholesterol in dogs had to do with hypothyroidism.

    I hope you find what you're looking for.

    Take care,
    Carmen

  4. I'm thinking the dogs should be doing lo-carb as well. No corn or rice
    fillers. More fat, not less. If a lo-carb diet lowers triglycerides in
    humans, why wouldn't it work for dogs too? Why not try feeding them meat,
    fish, fowl, and eggs for a month or 2 and get them re-tested. Cost may be a
    factor for you, but you may have to spend it on drugs later, which may be
    even more than switching to a more expensive diet. Meals closer to their
    natural ones certainly couldn't hurt them.
    Tom
    210/180/180
    --------------------------------------------------------
    "Debbie Cusick" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sQK1d.18572$z_3.1347@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all
    getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup


    and

    Quoted message said:

    shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them,
    which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with


    some

    Quoted message said:

    crazy numbers.

    Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of
    290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not


    high,

    Quoted message said:

    they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who
    have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their
    therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a
    very strict low-fat diet.

    My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand


    vet's

    Quoted message said:

    love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold
    through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the
    ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient


    in

    Quoted message said:

    all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that
    corn is a very common allergen for dogs.

    So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest


    their

    Quoted message said:

    blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to
    heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural
    Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content
    fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the
    high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to
    to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself
    wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in
    usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about
    their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the
    350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-)

    --
    Debbie

  5. Carmen said:


    http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp

    Input "hypercholesterolemia". Most of what I found on the 'net
    concerning high cholesterol in dogs had to do with hypothyroidism.

    Thanks for the Merck link. Great site. Oddly, neither dog had high
    cholesterol as far as their overall number went, just the triglycerides,
    which makes me wonder if the test was skewed in some way. Thyroid was also
    checked, and both are normal there as well. My third dog, who *does* suffer
    from hypothyroidism, and is on medication for it, has pefectly normal
    triglyceride levels.

    I never know what to think anymore. I posted a question on
    rec.pets.dogs.health also, and everyone there is telling me that Science
    Diet is an excellent thing for dogs, and almost no dogs are allergic to
    corn, and it's an excellent food for them. Yet I've had many others tell me
    the exact opposite. It's as bad as dietary advice in humans. :-)
    --
    Debbie

  6. Quoted message said:

    and everyone there is telling me that Science
    Diet is an excellent thing for dogs, and almost no dogs are allergic to
    corn, and it's an excellent food for them. Yet I've had many others tell me
    the exact opposite. It's as bad as dietary advice in humans. :-)

    Maybe every dog is different, just like humans? I really can't imagine how or
    why rice and corn would be good for carnivores though. It just seems odd. But
    I'm no expert.
    LCing since 12/01/03-
    Me- 5'7" 265/166/140
    & hubby- 6' 310/188/180
    http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/lcer09/my_photos


  7. Quoted message said:


    My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand


    vet's

    Quoted message said:

    love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold
    through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the
    ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient


    in

    Quoted message said:

    all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that
    corn is a very common allergen for dogs.

    Science Diet, Eukanuba, and those other expensive dog foods are formulated
    to be easier on the dog's intestines while producing less waste products.
    My dog was on the one that is mainly rice and chicken because that was
    easier on her liver and kidneys as she got older. Do you know if your dogs
    are allergic to corn? If not, what's the worry?

    Try the Science Diet for a short time and see how your dogs adapt to it.
    BTW: did he recommend the canned or the dry?

    Pat in TX

  8. get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down a rice
    paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment.

    --
    Peace,
    Pen
    --
    Pawbreakers - The Candy for Cats!
    http://www.pawbreakers.com

    "Debbie Cusick" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sQK1d.18572$z_3.1347@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all
    getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup


    and

    Quoted message said:

    shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them,
    which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with


    some

    Quoted message said:

    crazy numbers.

    Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of
    290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not


    high,

    Quoted message said:

    they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who
    have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their
    therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a
    very strict low-fat diet.

    My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand


    vet's

    Quoted message said:

    love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold
    through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the
    ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient


    in

    Quoted message said:

    all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that
    corn is a very common allergen for dogs.

    So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest


    their

    Quoted message said:

    blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to
    heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural
    Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content
    fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the
    high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to
    to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself
    wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in
    usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about
    their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the
    350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-)

    --
    Debbie


  9. Quoted message said:


    I don't see how rice is going to help them...and I don't see how low fat
    will be particularly healthly for them since that usually means high carb.

    The rice is to make it easier on their kidneys, etc., to digest the food.

    Pat in TX

  10. Pat said:


    Quoted message said:


    I don't see how rice is going to help them...and I don't see how low fat
    will be particularly healthly for them since that usually means high
    carb.

    The rice is to make it easier on their kidneys, etc., to digest the food.

    Pat in TX

    Wasn't there a "low carb thread for dogs" sometime ago where people said
    their dogs did better on low carb?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  11. If you want to have a little fun while you are doing some research on canine
    nutrition -- read Dr. Billinghurst and Ray Audette at the same time and then
    Dr. Pitcairn and Dr. Atkins🙂

    Feeding dry kibble to dogs is the equivalent of feeding yourself beans and rice
    and "whole grain" pasta -- it sounds helathy until you stop looking at it
    through the lens of the low-fat paradigm.

    And as for the quality of the ingedients -- how can they be paying for decent
    ingredients yet selling anything that cheap per pound? The cost of the bag is
    greater than the cost of the actual food in the bag (and probably contains
    about the same amount of AVAILABLE protein).

    Enjoy your research -- there is TONS of info out there🙂Robyn
    ***********************************
    Robyn Lori Rosenthal
    Sterling Cotons and Park Place Grooming
    Sterling, VA USA
    ***********************************

  12. Debbie, I was always able to get Science Diet dog food in pet stores when I
    was using it.
    I liked it because it was pelletized, not the puffed up kind of dog food. I
    had a dog die of gastric torsion (sp?) which might have been prevented with
    a different type food.
    It's pretty expensive to lc your dogs.
    🙁

    jo
    nj...who is down to one dog...but up to 4 cats!

    Quoted message said:

    Debbie Cusick wrote:
    || Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are
    || all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly
    || checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood
    || panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of
    || indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed,
    || but the results came back with some crazy numbers.
    || Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a
    || max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those
    || are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some
    || research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of
    || the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and
    || how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have
    || found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat
    || diet.
    || My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't
    || understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact
    || that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit
    || on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use
    || corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've
    || looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very
    || common allergen for dogs.

  13. "Penelope Baker" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:10kfe4vp0tjdcc1
    @corp.supernews.com:

    Quoted message said:

    get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down a rice
    paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment.

    While I'm not a true believer in either dry or canned food for dogs (if I
    had my druthers I'd feed the BARF diet), they would indeed 'hunt' rice and
    corn if left on their own.

    A dog left on his own to wander the streets (there is no 'natural
    environment' for today's dogs that doesn't include living with and
    depending on humans) will eat anything that looks appealing, whether it's a
    T-bone, a bag of doritos, white rice, carrots, or a Milky Way.

    IOW, they don't just go for meat.

    Cate

  14. "Debbie Cusick" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:sQK1d.18572$z_
    3.1347@trndny07:

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone ever had any experience with the above?

    I don't know the answer, but I suggest posting the question at
    alt.med.veterinary. It's been a long time since I posted at AMV and I don't
    know if any actual vets are still there, but try.

    Also try at rec.pets.dogs.behavior. RPDB has a lot of knowledgeable owners
    that don't post at RPD.health--and almost none of them are Science Diet
    advocates (including me). Health issues are regularly discussed there.
    (Beware of two particularly bothersome trolls in RPDB, one of whom is
    almost certainly certifiable, the other merely annoying. They are so
    prolific a newbie might mistakenly think they're representative of the ng.)

    Cate

  15. "Cate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Penelope Baker" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    news:10kfe4vp0tjdcc1

    Quoted message said:

    @corp.supernews.com:

    Quoted message said:

    get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down a


    rice

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment.

    While I'm not a true believer in either dry or canned food for dogs (if I
    had my druthers I'd feed the BARF diet), they would indeed 'hunt' rice and
    corn if left on their own.

    A dog left on his own to wander the streets (there is no 'natural
    environment' for today's dogs that doesn't include living with and
    depending on humans) will eat anything that looks appealing, whether it's


    a

    Quoted message said:

    T-bone, a bag of doritos, white rice, carrots, or a Milky Way.

    that's exactly my point. they are opportunistic, but they would never,
    EVER, hunt down a rice paddy or corn stalk in nature. they'd eat carrion,
    or whatever. the stuff that you mentioned is all products of humanity, not
    nature.

    peace,
    pen

  16. "Penelope Baker" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    that's exactly my point. they are opportunistic, but they would
    never, EVER, hunt down a rice paddy or corn stalk in nature.

    Well, they wouldn't hunt down anything 'in nature' because Labs and Yorkies
    don't and never have roamed the forests and plains having to fend for
    themselves.

    they'd

    Quoted message said:

    eat carrion, or whatever. the stuff that you mentioned is all
    products of humanity, not nature.

    My dog will also eat berries, a raw potato, an ear of corn, grasses, and
    anything else that appeals to him. Things that aren't products of humans
    and that are found in many dogs foods. Dogs are, as you say,
    opportunistists.

    However, I repeat that I'm not a fan of dried foods any more than I'd be a
    fan of a human living on People Chow day in and day out. I'd prefer to give
    my dog a proper balance of whole foods, and I hope one day to have the time
    to do it properly.

    Cate

  17. Pat wrote:
    ::: I don't see how rice is going to help them...and I don't see how
    ::: low fat will be particularly healthly for them since that usually
    ::: means high carb.
    ::
    :: The rice is to make it easier on their kidneys, etc., to digest the
    :: food.
    ::

    Would dogs in the wild chow on rice? Perhaps the rice is causing BG
    problems which results in higer trigs.

  18. "Debbie Cusick" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<smM1d.3970$_53.669@trndny02>...

    Quoted message said:
    Carmen said:


    http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp

    Input "hypercholesterolemia". Most of what I found on the 'net
    concerning high cholesterol in dogs had to do with hypothyroidism.

    Thanks for the Merck link. Great site. Oddly, neither dog had high
    cholesterol as far as their overall number went, just the triglycerides,
    which makes me wonder if the test was skewed in some way. Thyroid was also
    checked, and both are normal there as well. My third dog, who *does* suffer
    from hypothyroidism, and is on medication for it, has pefectly normal
    triglyceride levels.

    I never know what to think anymore. I posted a question on
    rec.pets.dogs.health also, and everyone there is telling me that Science
    Diet is an excellent thing for dogs, and almost no dogs are allergic to
    corn, and it's an excellent food for them. Yet I've had many others tell me
    the exact opposite. It's as bad as dietary advice in humans. :-)

    I don't have direct experience with elevated triglycerides in dogs,
    but I can second the rec for the Hill's Prescription Diet. My cat was
    severely overweight at 18.5 pounds 6 months ago. I put him on the
    Feline M/D per my vet's rec and now he's 16.2. Two pounds may not seem
    like much to you and me, but to a lil cat it's a lot! I guess M/D is
    sort of the low-carb option for cats. I wonder if I/D is the low-carb
    option for dogs. Also, my cat LOVES the stuff. Scarfs it right down
    without a touch of his former finickiness.

  19. Dogs are low carb and shouldn't give you high triglycerides.

    <g>

    Peter
    Before/Current Pix:
    http://users.thelink.net/marengo/weightlosspix/weightlosspix.html

  20. Cate wrote:
    || "Penelope Baker" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    || news:10kfe4vp0tjdcc1 @corp.supernews.com:
    ||
    ||| get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down
    ||| a rice paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment.
    ||
    || While I'm not a true believer in either dry or canned food for dogs
    || (if I had my druthers I'd feed the BARF diet), they would indeed
    || 'hunt' rice and corn if left on their own.
    ||
    || A dog left on his own to wander the streets (there is no 'natural
    || environment' for today's dogs that doesn't include living with and
    || depending on humans) will eat anything that looks appealing, whether
    || it's a T-bone, a bag of doritos, white rice, carrots, or a Milky Way.
    ||
    || IOW, they don't just go for meat.
    ||

    That only proves that they have become used to a diet of junk food, just
    like most of us here. If you where hungry, you'd eat potato chips, pop,
    cookies, etc, if you had no other choice. That doesn't mean that such foods
    are good for you. Likewise for the dog.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.