General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: HBO's Rome

Started by ATP* · · Last activity · 7 posts · 518 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 August 2005
Last activity
29 August 2005
Original author
ATP*
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
518
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Rome is worth Tivoing for the good parts, even if you don't like the story
    (which wasn't bad either). Looks like HBO is returning to their roots-
    gratuitous nudity......

  2. ATP* said:

    Looks like HBO is returning to their roots-
    gratuitous nudity......

    Its NOT TV it is HBO.

    If I wanted TV why the hell would I have cable?

    Rome sucked!

  3. ATP* said:

    Rome is worth Tivoing for the good parts, even if you don't like the story
    (which wasn't bad either). Looks like HBO is returning to their roots-
    gratuitous nudity......

    I didn't think there was anything special about it. The fight scenes were
    pretty lame, and the actress doing the nude scenes was a butterface.

    The old "I Claudius" the BBC did thirty years ago was better.

  4. "Velvet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I didn't think there was anything special about it. The fight scenes were
    pretty lame, and the actress doing the nude scenes was a butterface.

    The old "I Claudius" the BBC did thirty years ago was better.

    Ditto that. "I Claudius" is on the short list for best mini-series ever.
    Crummy sets, no special effects, just great actors and compelling
    characters. The opposite of Rome, with its expensive dazzle and its ho-hum
    characters. Even gratuitous nudity can't fill the vacuum. Unless things
    change drastically (and I wouldn't rule out the possibility), HBO has cooked
    up a turkey this time.

  5. "Velvet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    ATP* said:

    Rome is worth Tivoing for the good parts, even if you don't like the
    story
    (which wasn't bad either). Looks like HBO is returning to their roots-
    gratuitous nudity......

    I didn't think there was anything special about it. The fight scenes were
    pretty lame, and the actress doing the nude scenes was a butterface.

    The daughter was. The mother riding the "little goat man" was pretty hot.
    Although I didn't realize the Romans had access to breast enhancement
    technology.

  6. I didn't watch because it looks like subject matter I'm entirely not
    into. More importantly, I just figured it was some crappy Sunday night
    replacement for Six Feet Under or Sex in the City...or a time waster
    until The Sopranos or Curb Your Enthusiam returns. Based on the reviews
    here, it sounds like I might have been right.

  7. ATP* said:

    Although I didn't realize the Romans had access to breast enhancement
    technology.

    Performed by one of Dr. Salvatore Colabro's ancestors, no doubt.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.