UK and Europe · Public discussion

OT: Google Groups Beta behaviour - encouraging top posting.

Started by dkahn400 · · Last activity · 18 posts · 752 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 May 2005
Last activity
27 May 2005
Original author
dkahn400
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
752
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people to
    move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted before
    that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line above the
    quoted text and places the cursor there as though encouraging users to
    top post. I've noticed in the last couple of days it's now inserting 2
    blank lines above the quoted text making them hard to ignore and
    strongly suggesting that top posting is the default reply mode. This,
    and the hoops you have to jump through to get quoted text into your
    reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on Google's part. Am I
    alone in finding this sinister?

    --
    Dave...

  2. dkahn400 wrote:

    Am I alone in finding this sinister?

    I have just tried it and it does not put the cursor anywhere, but you
    have to click on reply under the "show options" to open the old post,
    click on reply after the post and it does not put any quoted text in.

  3. MartinM said:

    dkahn400 wrote:

    Am I alone in finding this sinister?

    I have just tried it and it does not put the cursor anywhere,
    but you have to click on reply under the "show options" to
    open the old post, click on reply after the post and it does
    not put any quoted text in.

    You're right, it's not setting the cursor ATM although it is inserting
    2 blank lines above the quoted text. An alternative way to get the
    quoted text is to click on Reply after the post, then click Preview,
    then click Edit Message. Both methods seems to give the same result
    currently.

    --
    Dave...

  4. dkahn400 <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on Google's part. Am I
    : alone in finding this sinister?

    Google clearly think top-posting is right. There seems to be no way
    to get gmail to not top-post as well.

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

  5. Arthur Clune said:

    Google clearly think top-posting is right. There seems to be no way
    to get gmail to not top-post as well.

    Another one for the list of Minions of Stan, then...

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  6. Arthur Clune said:

    dkahn400 <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on Google's part. Am I
    : alone in finding this sinister?

    Malice:incompetance:observation. The rest of the new news interface is so
    screwed up as to make it nearly impossible to follow a thread. Remember
    those?

    Quoted message said:

    Google clearly think top-posting is right. There seems to be no way
    to get gmail to not top-post as well.

    You can at least use a proper mail client with gmail via its IMAPS/SMTP
    interfaces. Unlike certain other free email accounts.

    --
    Andrew Chadwick

  7. MartinM said:

    dkahn400 wrote:

    Am I alone in finding this sinister?

    I have just tried it and it does not put the cursor anywhere, but you
    have to click on reply under the "show options" to open the old post,
    click on reply after the post and it does not put any quoted text in.

    Thanks for that, I was wondering how to do that since I have just
    shifted to using google groups.

    ...d

  8. This was posted by just clicking "reply". I'd guess this is how most
    peope will use it, the result is a post with no context at all.

  9. dkahn400 said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people to
    move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted before
    that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line above the
    quoted text and places the cursor there as though encouraging users to
    top post. I've noticed in the last couple of days it's now inserting 2
    blank lines above the quoted text making them hard to ignore and
    strongly suggesting that top posting is the default reply mode. This,
    and the hoops you have to jump through to get quoted text into your
    reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on Google's part. Am I
    alone in finding this sinister?

    This was done by "show options" "reply". It does indeed put two blank
    lines above the attribution and quotes. I've left them in here.

    TBH putting the cursor at the top is correct behaviour, that's where
    you want it to start snipping. But the 2 blank lines are definetly an
    encouragement to top-posting and should be removed.

  10. Pyromancer said:

    This was posted by just clicking "reply". I'd guess this is how most
    peope will use it, the result is a post with no context at all.

    That will work well for cyclingforums users then.

    Oh, /context/. As you were, then.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  11. in message <[email hidden]>,

    dkahn400 (') said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people
    to move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted
    before that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line
    above the quoted text and places the cursor there as though
    encouraging users to top post. I've noticed in the last couple of days
    it's now inserting 2 blank lines above the quoted text making them
    hard to ignore and strongly suggesting that top posting is the default
    reply mode. This, and the hoops you have to jump through to get quoted
    text into your reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on
    Google's part. Am I alone in finding this sinister?

    It does seem mildly incompatible with 'do no evil'.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    to err is human, to lisp divine
    ;; attributed to Kim Philby, oddly enough.

  12. "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people to
    move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted before
    that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line above the
    quoted text and places the cursor there as though encouraging users to
    top post.

    So does Outlook Express :-)

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  13. Tumbleweed said:

    "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people
    to move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted
    before that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line
    above the quoted text and places the cursor there as though
    encouraging users to top post.

    So does Outlook Express :-)

    See below.

    --
    Andy Morris

    AndyAtJinkasDotFreeserve.Co.UK

    Love this:
    Put an end to Outlook Express's messy quotes
    http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

  14. Pyromancer said:
    dkahn400 said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird behaviour of
    the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed to encourage people to
    move away from the traditional Usenet quoting style. I've noted before
    that when replying to a post it automatically inserts a line above the
    quoted text and places the cursor there as though encouraging users to
    top post. I've noticed in the last couple of days it's now inserting 2
    blank lines above the quoted text making them hard to ignore and
    strongly suggesting that top posting is the default reply mode. This,
    and the hoops you have to jump through to get quoted text into your
    reply in the first place, are clearly deliberate on Google's part. Am I
    alone in finding this sinister?

    Quoted message said:

    This was done by "show options" "reply". It does indeed put two blank
    lines above the attribution and quotes. I've left them in here.

    Quoted message said:

    TBH putting the cursor at the top is correct behaviour, that's where
    you want it to start snipping. But the 2 blank lines are definetly an
    encouragement to top-posting and should be removed.

    You don't want it to be difficult to top post, otherwise idiots will
    stop doing it.
    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  15. Tumbleweed said:

    "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird
    behaviour of the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed
    to encourage people to move away from the traditional Usenet
    quoting style. I've noted before that when replying to a post
    it automatically inserts a line above the quoted text and places
    the cursor there as though encouraging users to top post.

    So does Outlook Express :-)

    Need I say more?

    --
    Dave...

  16. Tumbleweed <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : [ re top posting]
    : So does Outlook Express :-)

    And, very annoyingly, so does Apple Mail. And there's no option to change
    it. Grrr.

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

  17. "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tumbleweed said:

    "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There's been some discussion here before about the weird
    behaviour of the Google Groups Beta and how it seems designed
    to encourage people to move away from the traditional Usenet
    quoting style. I've noted before that when replying to a post
    it automatically inserts a line above the quoted text and places
    the cursor there as though encouraging users to top post.

    So does Outlook Express :-)

    Need I say more?

    ...only that there is no need for conspiracy theory, simple incompetence will
    suffice (as it does for most areas of life)

    --
    Tumbleweed

    email replies not necessary but to contact use;
    tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

  18. Just zis Guy said:

    Another one for the list of Minions of Stan, then...

    http://www.google.co.uk/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=user&hl=en_GB
    is the feedback form if you want to tell them.

    Meanwhile, some of the international Googles still use the old interface.
    Such as http://www.google.com.mt/intl/en/

    Theo

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.