UK and Europe · Public discussion

OT Eye surgery

Started by Stan Cox · · Last activity · 14 posts · 380 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 August 2004
Last activity
28 August 2004
Original author
Stan Cox
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
380
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well finally the thing I have hinted at a few time this year has
    happened. I had cataract surgery yesterday. Things seem to have gone
    very well. My eyesight which had become diabolical through my left eye
    is crytal clear again. I now just have to make sure that I dont rub the
    eye or otherwise knock it for the next two weeks and use the antibiotic
    drops and all should be well. I find it hard to express how much this
    has hung over me these last few months. I have a irrational fear of eye
    trouble so this has been difficult. As is often the case with these
    things though once I was at the hospital things were much less traumatic
    than I feared.
    Now I can start to plan for next year. I intend to go on a training
    camp in the spring and road race again(I havent this year because of my
    lack of peripheral vision to my left). I am also probably going to treat
    myself to a new bike. Something expensive and carbon I think.

    Stan Cox
    P.s. I'm only 42 and this has all happened in less than a year.

  2. in message <[email hidden]>, Stan Cox

    (') said:

    Well finally the thing I have hinted at a few time this year has
    happened. I had cataract surgery yesterday. Things seem to have gone
    very well. My eyesight which had become diabolical through my left eye
    is crytal clear again. I now just have to make sure that I dont rub
    the eye or otherwise knock it for the next two weeks and use the
    antibiotic drops and all should be well.
    Stan Cox
    P.s. I'm only 42 and this has all happened in less than a year.

    Sympathy. My eyesight started to go horribly when I was 47 and is still
    deteriorating pretty rapidly. I now have to use three different focal
    lengths of glasses for close work. Fortunately my eyesight has gone
    long - I actually focus past infinity now, but not sufficiently badly
    that I need to wear corrective glasses when cycling. It's only a matter
    of time, though...

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; in faecibus sapiens rheum propagabit

  3. Stan Cox said:

    Well finally the thing I have hinted at a few time this year has
    happened. I had cataract surgery yesterday. Things seem to have gone
    very well. My eyesight which had become diabolical through my left eye
    is crytal clear again.


    /snip

    That's wonderful news. Hope you don't have any more eye problems again.

    ~PB

  4. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Stan Cox

    (') said:

    Well finally the thing I have hinted at a few time this year has
    happened. I had cataract surgery yesterday. Things seem to have gone
    very well. My eyesight which had become diabolical through my left eye
    is crytal clear again. I now just have to make sure that I dont rub
    the eye or otherwise knock it for the next two weeks and use the
    antibiotic drops and all should be well.
    Stan Cox
    P.s. I'm only 42 and this has all happened in less than a year.

    Sympathy. My eyesight started to go horribly when I was 47 and is still
    deteriorating pretty rapidly. I now have to use three different focal
    lengths of glasses for close work. Fortunately my eyesight has gone
    long - I actually focus past infinity now, but not sufficiently badly
    that I need to wear corrective glasses when cycling. It's only a matter
    of time, though...


    Freaky isnt it. I had always taken my excellent vision for granted and
    it was a hell of a shock when it started to go. You suddenly realise how
    difficult life would be if you couldnt see. I have spent all season
    wondering if it could be my last but I'll be back next year. I have
    never been so happy looking forward to a winters riding. 🙂

    Stan Cox

  5. I've worked in optics for the last 13 years and level of skill and results
    from cataract surgery has changed immensely in that time.
    In the early days of cataract surgery a patient was left without a lens in
    their eye. This meant they would always have to wear horrendously thick
    glasses.
    It has to progressed to the point now where not only does the patient have
    their lens replaced the surgeon (if it goes well and it almost always does)
    will often try to reduce any existing distance prescription. People that had
    always worn glasses (before the cataract) can end up only having to wear
    spex for reading.

    I hope your continue to pleased with the results Stan.

    Regards

    Paul F

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 - Release Date: 24/08/2004

  6. Paul said:

    I've worked in optics for the last 13 years


    ^^^^^^

    ? Ophthalmics surely?

    Quoted message said:

    and level of skill and results
    from cataract surgery has changed immensely in that time.
    In the early days of cataract surgery a patient was left without a lens in
    their eye. This meant they would always have to wear horrendously thick
    glasses.

    In the early days meaning pre Ridley, 1949! Intraocular lenses have
    been standard for years. The big advances have been in foldable lenses
    and phacoemulsifiers so the incision can be minimised and
    photodisruptors to open the clouded capsule and avoid a second operation.

    Quoted message said:

    It has to progressed to the point now where not only does the patient have
    their lens replaced the surgeon (if it goes well and it almost always does)
    will often try to reduce any existing distance prescription. People that had
    always worn glasses (before the cataract) can end up only having to wear
    spex for reading.

    Refracting the patient and correcting their vision in cataract surgery
    has again been standard for years.

    Tony

  7. Tony Raven said:
    Paul said:

    I've worked in optics for the last 13 years

    ^^^^^^

    ? Ophthalmics surely?

    Quoted message said:

    and level of skill and results from cataract surgery has changed
    immensely in that time.
    In the early days of cataract surgery a patient was left without a
    lens in their eye. This meant they would always have to wear
    horrendously thick glasses.

    In the early days meaning pre Ridley, 1949! Intraocular lenses have
    been standard for years. The big advances have been in foldable lenses
    and phacoemulsifiers so the incision can be minimised and
    photodisruptors to open the clouded capsule and avoid a second operation.

    Quoted message said:

    It has to progressed to the point now where not only does the patient
    have their lens replaced the surgeon (if it goes well and it almost
    always does) will often try to reduce any existing distance
    prescription. People that had always worn glasses (before the
    cataract) can end up only having to wear spex for reading.

    Refracting the patient and correcting their vision in cataract surgery
    has again been standard for years.

    Tony


    Thanks all. All I know is that it seems to have done the trick for me. I
    am bloody relieved that I have had this now with the foldable lenses etc
    and therefore no need for a stitch in the eye. Here I am a day later at
    home watching telly without glasses which I havent been able to do for a
    while.

    Stan Cox

  8. Stan Cox <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Well finally the thing I have hinted at a few time this year has
    happened. I had cataract surgery yesterday. Things seem to have gone
    very well. My eyesight which had become diabolical through my left eye
    is crytal clear again. I now just have to make sure that I dont rub the
    eye or otherwise knock it for the next two weeks and use the antibiotic
    drops and all should be well.

    Congratulations, Stan. Good news!

    --
    Dave...

  9. Tony Raven [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    In the early days meaning pre Ridley, 1949! Intraocular lenses have
    been standard for years. The big advances have been in foldable lenses
    and phacoemulsifiers so the incision can be minimised and
    photodisruptors to open the clouded capsule and avoid a second operation.

    Although interestingly, in the states these advances have started to
    spill over into normal vision correction but here we keep playing with
    lasers. Given that my eyesight is so bad that I fall at the outer limits
    of what is considered operable with LASIK (And the best they would hope
    for is the minimum driving standard!) I'm quite interested in any
    advances that might offer a permanent improvement in vision.

    Jon

  10. Jon Senior said:


    Although interestingly, in the states these advances have started to
    spill over into normal vision correction but here we keep playing with
    lasers. Given that my eyesight is so bad that I fall at the outer limits
    of what is considered operable with LASIK (And the best they would hope
    for is the minimum driving standard!) I'm quite interested in any
    advances that might offer a permanent improvement in vision.

    Have you considered that by partially correcting you could get away with
    thinner and lighter glasses rather than hoping to go totally without?

    Tony

  11. In news:[email hidden],
    Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote:
    I actually focus past infinity now,

    Can you see the back of your own head?
    --

    Martin Bulmer

  12. "Martin Bulmer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In news:[email hidden],
    Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote:
    I actually focus past infinity now,

    Can you see the back of your own head?

    I can't do this with my eyes, but most good camera lenses will focus past
    infinity.

    I have never seen the back of my own head through a camera lens.
    --
    Mark South, Super Genius: World Citizen, Net Denizen

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Have you considered that by partially correcting you could get away with
    thinner and lighter glasses rather than hoping to go totally without?

    I currently wear contacts as a way of "going without", but given that
    the surgery is a one-time trick, I'd rather opt for something that
    eliminates (Or nearly eliminates) the problem rather than take what's
    currently on offer and rule out the possibility of a better correction
    later.

    When I first started to develop short-sightedness I read up on the
    options available. Success rates seem to have improved a little but
    other than that there seems to have been little major progress in the
    last 10 / 15 years.

    Jon

  14. Jon Senior said:


    I currently wear contacts as a way of "going without", but given that
    the surgery is a one-time trick, I'd rather opt for something that
    eliminates (Or nearly eliminates) the problem rather than take what's
    currently on offer and rule out the possibility of a better correction
    later.

    When I first started to develop short-sightedness I read up on the
    options available. Success rates seem to have improved a little but
    other than that there seems to have been little major progress in the
    last 10 / 15 years.

    Its unlikely to change much. The problems with large corrections are
    down to biological variability in the healing. The initial correction
    can physically be done just as accurately but because more tissue is
    removed, the change in correction due to healing is more variable.

    Tony

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.