General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT Curious article on changing height and BMI

Started by Roger Zoul · · Last activity · 14 posts · 469 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 June 2005
Last activity
29 June 2005
Original author
Roger Zoul
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
469
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html

    One needs to log in, though.

  2. That's very interesting, I had wondered about that as I have lost a couple
    of inches (age 69). At my last doctor's appointment she suggested that 180
    would be a good goal weight for me, I used to be 5'9.5" and am now somewhere
    south of 5'8". When I was thin, 140 was a good weight for me. She had
    looked at some chart she had and said they had revised their
    recommendations.

    In news:[email hidden],
    Roger Zoul <[email hidden]> stated
    | http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html
    |
    | One needs to log in, though.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html

    One needs to log in, though.

    I've discovered that many online newspapers are connected as far as
    signing in goes. You can sign up with Hotmail or Yahoo or whatever for
    a free email address (so as not to give away your MAIN email info), make
    up personal info and then use the same id and password for various
    papers without necessarily having to go through the registration
    process.

    --
    Saffire
    205/137/125
    Atkins since 6/14/03
    Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

  4. Roger Zoul said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html

    One needs to log in, though.


    Now we have a new "explanation" for those overweight folk who don't want
    to face facts.

    Instead of "I'm not over weight, I'm just big boned", we have "I'm not
    overweight, it's just that my bones have shrunk."

    Add that to the article below and we will enough excuses for anybody who
    doesn't want to lose weight.

    http://tinyurl.com/7uyfv

    It seems that losing weight doesn't offer as much benefit as is usually
    touted. The article doesn't mention the difference in people who lose
    weight with exercise, hopefully (if there is any validity in this)
    exercise will counter the problem.

    Regards

    David

    --

    To email me, please include the letters DNF anywhere in the subject line.

    All other mail is automatically deleted.

  5. J. David Anderson wrote:
    ::
    :: Add that to the article below and we will enough excuses for anybody
    :: who doesn't want to lose weight.
    ::
    :: http://tinyurl.com/7uyfv
    ::
    :: It seems that losing weight doesn't offer as much benefit as is
    :: usually touted. The article doesn't mention the difference in people
    :: who lose weight with exercise, hopefully (if there is any validity
    :: in this) exercise will counter the problem.

    Fat being lost from lean organs? Now that's something new.

  6. I would like to know if all BMI are the same. The one at
    obesityhelp.com says I would still be obese at 150????? It says my BMI
    was a whopping 73.3 and I havent checked for some time but last time I
    had it had dropped to the low 50's. Thats progress I guess. Those
    charts dont take into account bone size though. Im built for comfort
    not speed LOL. I have a 7.5 inch wrist when I am thin. Im not made to
    weigh 120 by any means. I'm a hearty girl and feel great at 200 ( oh
    gawd that was so long ago seeing 200!!!!).
    Laureen

    Roger Zoul said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html

    One needs to log in, though.

  7. Still with the big-boned bs.

    --
    Now [censored]. You cannot possibly be this stupid and remember to
    breathe. You must be trolling. -- Carmen

    "Laureen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to know if all BMI are the same. The one at
    obesityhelp.com says I would still be obese at 150????? It says my BMI
    was a whopping 73.3 and I havent checked for some time but last time I
    had it had dropped to the low 50's. Thats progress I guess. Those
    charts dont take into account bone size though. Im built for comfort
    not speed LOL. I have a 7.5 inch wrist when I am thin. Im not made to
    weigh 120 by any means. I'm a hearty girl and feel great at 200 ( oh
    gawd that was so long ago seeing 200!!!!).
    Laureen

    Roger Zoul said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/health/28bmi.html

    One needs to log in, though.


  8. Quoting Laureen:

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to know if all BMI are the same.

    BMI is computed as follows:
    (weight in pounds / (height in inches) * (height in inches)) * 703

    ***
    As far as estimating frame size goes, the Met Life website provides
    the following instructions:

    "Bend forearm upward at a 90 degree angle. Keep fingers straight and
    turn the inside of your wrist toward your body. Place thumb and index
    finger of other hand on the two prominent bones on either side of the
    elbow. Measure space between your fingers on a ruler.(A physician
    would use a caliper.) Compare with tables below listing elbow
    measurements for medium-framed men and women. Measurements lower
    than those listed indicate small frame. Higher measurements indicate
    large frame."

    The measurement chart for this is towards the bottom of this page:
    http://www.halls.md/ideal-weight/met.htm

  9. Quoting Laureen:

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to know if all BMI are the same.

    BMI is computed as follows:
    (weight in pounds / (height in inches) * (height in inches)) * 703

    ***
    As far as estimating frame size goes, the Met Life website provides
    the following instructions:

    "Bend forearm upward at a 90 degree angle. Keep fingers straight and
    turn the inside of your wrist toward your body. Place thumb and index
    finger of other hand on the two prominent bones on either side of the
    elbow. Measure space between your fingers on a ruler.(A physician
    would use a caliper.) Compare with tables below listing elbow
    measurements for medium-framed men and women. Measurements lower
    than those listed indicate small frame. Higher measurements indicate
    large frame."

    The measurement chart for this is towards the bottom of this page:
    http://www.halls.md/ideal-weight/met.htm

  10. Quoting JC Der Koenig:

    Quoted message said:

    Still with the big-boned bs.

    As you obviously know (but I'm going to note anyway 🙂), when one
    reviews insurance height/weight charts, there's generally only a 20-30
    pound maximum recommended difference between small to large frames (if
    one compares -low- end of range to -low- end of range, or high/high).

    To wit:

    6' 0" female -- small frame 138-151, large 158-179

    6' 4" male -- small frame 162-176, large 181-207

    (I deliberately picked the most extreme examples on the MetLife chart)

  11. "Suze" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (I deliberately picked the most extreme examples on the MetLife chart)

    That should work for Laureen, because she's extremely stupid.

  12. Quoting JC Der Koenig:

    Quoted message said:

    "Suze" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    (I deliberately picked the most extreme examples on the MetLife chart)

    That should work for Laureen, because she's extremely stupid.

    🙂
    Unless she's 6 foot tall, not bloody likely.

  13. "Suze" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Quoting JC Der Koenig:

    Quoted message said:

    "Suze" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    (I deliberately picked the most extreme examples on the MetLife chart)

    That should work for Laureen, because she's extremely stupid.

    🙂
    Unless she's 6 foot tall, not bloody likely.

    It's not likely that she'll ever be under 200 pounds either.

  14. "Laureen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I would like to know if all BMI are the same. The one at
    obesityhelp.com says I would still be obese at 150????? It says my BMI
    was a whopping 73.3 and I havent checked for some time but last time I
    had it had dropped to the low 50's. Thats progress I guess. Those
    charts dont take into account bone size though. Im built for comfort
    not speed LOL. I have a 7.5 inch wrist when I am thin. Im not made to
    weigh 120 by any means. I'm a hearty girl and feel great at 200 ( oh

    Wow, I just measured my wrist at 6 1/8" and my BMI was 35 the last time I
    checked, dead in the middle of obese. I sure can't use the big bones alibi,
    I guess. I think BMI is figured
    (weight in pounds x 703)/(height in inches x height in inches) = BMI
    If different sites disagree then one or both is wrong.

    --
    No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.