UK and Europe · Public discussion

OT- but very funny

Started by Sniper8052 · · Last activity · 27 posts · 1,285 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 November 2004
Last activity
19 November 2004
Original author
Sniper8052
Posts
27
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,285
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 27
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The following is an actual question given on a University of
    Washington chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so "profound"
    that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is,
    of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

    Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic
    (absorbs heat)?

    Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas
    cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
    One student, however, wrote the following:
    First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we
    need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at
    which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul
    gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

    As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different
    Religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state
    that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since
    there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong
    to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With
    birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in
    Hell to increase exponentially.

    Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's
    Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay
    the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are
    added.

    This gives two possibilities:
    1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls
    enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until
    all Hell breaks loose.
    2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in
    Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

    So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my
    Freshman year that, "it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with
    you", and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night,
    then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and
    has already frozen over.

    The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it
    follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore,
    extinct.........leaving only Heaven thereby proving the existence of a
    divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my
    God."

    THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY A+

    Sniper8052

  2. A different ending to the one I have......

    "Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
    Support your answer with a proof."

    Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas
    cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some
    variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

    "First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So
    we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they
    are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to
    Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many
    souls
    are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the
    world
    today.
    Some of these religions state that if you are not of their religion you will
    go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since
    people
    do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and
    all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect
    the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, if we look at
    the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in
    order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume
    of
    Hell has to expand as souls are added. This gives two possibilities.

    (1) If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls
    enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until
    all Hell
    breaks loose.

    (2) Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of
    souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell
    freezes over.

    So which is it?

    If we accept the postulate given to me by Miss Therese Banyan during my
    Fresh-man year that "It will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with
    you," and
    take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual
    relations
    with her, then🙁2) cannot be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is
    exothermic."

    The student got the only A.

    --
    kitemap
    http://ugcc.co.uk

  3. Sniper8052 said:

    Hell.

    Funny - but not true.

    http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/hell.asp

    --
    Geek Made Easy - http://www.geekmadeeasy.com/
    We're geeks so you don't have to be

  4. quote='David Glover'Sniper8052 said:

    Hell.

    Funny - but not true.

    http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/hell.asp

    --
    Geek Made Easy - http://www.geekmadeeasy.com/
    We're geeks so you don't have to be[/QUOTE]
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sniper8052

    Made me laugh 🙂

    A good joke is worth sharing even if it's not true 😉

    Have fun

    Sniper8052

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Here's one,

    When I was at prep school my brother's form teacher stormed into my class, grabbed me by the throat and informed me " I've bloody well had enough of your brother" shake, shake, gasp, gasp...
    I took it he wasn't looking forward to my going up to his class the next year 🙂

    Sniper8052

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  5. But, what has this got to do with cycling ?

    Can't you find a newsgroup to suit ?

    AH

    "Sniper8052" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The following is an actual question given on a University of
    Washington chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so
    "profound"
    that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which
    is,
    of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

    Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic
    (absorbs heat)?

    Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law
    (gas
    cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some
    variant.
    One student, however, wrote the following:
    First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we

    need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate
    at
    which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a
    soul
    gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

    As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different
    Religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state

    that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell.
    Since
    there is more than one of these religions and since people do not
    belong
    to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
    With
    birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in

    Hell to increase exponentially.

    Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because
    Boyle's
    Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to
    stay
    the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are

    added.

    This gives two possibilities:
    1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls

    enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase
    until
    all Hell breaks loose.
    2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in

    Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes
    over.

    So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during
    my
    Freshman year that, "it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with

    you", and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night,

    then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic
    and
    has already frozen over.

    The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it
    follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore,
    extinct.........leaving only Heaven thereby proving the existence of a

    divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh
    my
    God."

    THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY A+

    Sniper8052

    --
    Sniper8052

  6. Response to Andy Howes:

    Quoted message said:

    But, what has this got to do with cycling ?

    Can't you find a newsgroup to suit ?

    The "OT" in the title stands for "off-topic"; any group of people who
    have one subject in common will occasionally raise off-topic matters, and
    experienced Usenet users shouldn't be too bothered by it, IMHO.

    If there's anything else you need to know, e.g. what top-posting is, or
    when to snip posts, you only have to ask. In fact, round here, you
    probably won't even have to ask. ;-)

    --
    Mark, UK.
    We hope to hear him swear, we love to hear him squeak,
    We like to see him biting fingers in his horny beak.

  7. "Andy Howes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    But, what has this got to do with cycling ?

    Can't you find a newsgroup to suit ?

    AH


    Sorry but this is a newsgroup of cycling enthusiasts who also enjoy a good
    joke or discussion of any topic no matter what they relate to. So keep up
    the OT stuff and you find a newsgroup to suit your anal retentive attitude

    Woody

  8. Andy Howes said:

    But, what has this got to do with cycling ?

    Can't you find a newsgroup to suit ?

    Ah, just what u.r.c needed. A clueless top-posting newbie net.cop.
    That's quite an impressive start you've made there in only 2 posts!

    James
    --
    If I have seen further than others, it is
    by treading on the toes of giants.
    http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

  9. James Annan said:

    Ah, just what u.r.c needed. A clueless top-posting newbie net.cop.
    That's quite an impressive start you've made there in only 2 posts!

    I'm almost starting to feel sorry for the guy. I hope that he feels
    very embarrassed the next time he reads urc - because it's either that
    or he'll turn out to be one of those people who'll waste our time for
    the next two weeks swearing that black is white.

    Although a little Googling reveals that he's not actually a newbie. He
    posted twice in July, and for all we know he may have been lurking for
    months.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  10. Andy Howes said:

    But, what has this got to do with cycling ?
    Can't you find a newsgroup to suit ?

    I think you are looking for alt.humourless.gits

    HTH, HAND etc.

    --
    Guy

  11. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> whizzed past me
    shouting

    Quoted message said:


    HTH, HAND etc.


    This group could do with more jokes, especially ones that border on the
    topic, but with so much traffic it'd be easy to miss them.

    Can we train people to mark them in the subject line (eg "Joke - naked
    offroad unicyclist"😉 or would that be too bureaucratic for people here?

    --
    Sue ];(🙂

    What goes down must come up again - Confucius' Law of Mountain Biking

  12. On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:23:42 +0000, Sue White <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    This group could do with more jokes, especially ones that border on the
    topic, but with so much traffic it'd be easy to miss them.
    Can we train people to mark them in the subject line (eg "Joke - naked
    offroad unicyclist"😉 or would that be too bureaucratic for people here?

    OT works for me. It is OT after all :-) On topic joaks need no
    separate identifier, IMO.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  13. Sue White suggested:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Can we train people to mark them in the subject line (eg "Joke - naked
    offroad unicyclist"😉 or would that be too bureaucratic for people here?

    to which Guy responded:

    Quoted message said:

    OT works for me. It is OT after all :-)

    Erm, in what way is a naked offroad unicyclist OT?

    ;-)

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  14. Danny Colyer [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    Erm, in what way is a naked offroad unicyclist OT?

    If Guy retracts it, will you promise _NOT_ to post jpegs? ;-)

    Jon

  15. Danny Colyer said:

    Erm, in what way is a naked offroad unicyclist OT?

    Off Tarmac?

    One-wheel, [censored]?

    -dan

    --
    "please make sure that the person is your friend before you confirm"

  16. Jon Senior said:

    Danny Colyer [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    Erm, in what way is a naked offroad unicyclist OT?

    If Guy retracts it, will you promise _NOT_ to post jpegs? ;-)

    Jon

    Retracts *what*????

    --

    Velvet

  17. Velvet [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    Retracts *what*????

    The claim that a naked offroad unicyclist is OT. Do try to keep up. ;-)

    Jon

  18. Velvet wondered:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Retracts *what*????

    and Jon Senior responded:

    Quoted message said:

    The claim that a naked offroad unicyclist is OT.

    Phew, that's a relief.

    But I'm not about to make any promises that I may be unable to keep :-P

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  19. in message <[email hidden]>, Jon Senior

    jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk ('') said:

    Velvet [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    Retracts *what*????

    The claim that a naked offroad unicyclist is OT. Do try to keep up.

    It's not the woman's job to keep, err, up.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; 99% of browsers can't run ActiveX controls. Unfortunately
    ;; 99% of users are using the 1% of browsers that can...
    [seen on /. 08:04:02]

  20. in message <[email hidden]>, Jon Senior

    jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk ('') said:

    Velvet [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    Retracts *what*????

    The claim that a naked offroad unicyclist is OT. Do try to keep up.

    It's not the woman's job to keep, err, up.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; 99% of browsers can't run ActiveX controls. Unfortunately
    ;; 99% of users are using the 1% of browsers that can...
    [seen on /. 08:04:02]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.