General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: A Federal Offense

Started by Wayne Boatwright · · Last activity · 36 posts · 740 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 January 2006
Last activity
22 January 2006
Original author
Wayne Boatwright
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
740
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

    This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet,
    is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of
    Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and
    two years in prison.

    "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv
    Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.
    "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
    It's illegal to annoy.

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    --
    Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
    ________________________________________

    Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

  2. Wayne Boatwright said:

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    --
    Best
    Greg

  3. Gregory Morrow said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    I don't believe the "without disclosing his identity and with intent to
    annoy" part made it into the final bill.

    Bob

  4. Essentially, all it did was take an old law that was intended for
    heavy-breathing telephone pranksters, and added computers as a means of
    communication.

  5. Quoted message said:

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Quoted message said:

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Best
    Greg

    Whatever happened to "sticks an stones"? Yes, we all know they break
    bones but words people!! Words!!!!

    Just another "rule/law" chipping away at our freedom of speech. kev

  6. Wayne Boatwright said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

    This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet,
    is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of
    Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and
    two years in prison.

    "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv
    Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.
    "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
    It's illegal to annoy.

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    Well, this was the man (g.w.) who while governor of Texas, said there
    "should be limits to freedom".

    Bubba

    --
    You wanna measure or you wanna cook?

  7. Bob Myers said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

    Damn, there go all the newsgroups...

    And half of the news stories about the White House...

    --Blair

  8. On Thu 19 Jan 2006 03:54:14p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Bob Myers?

    Quoted message said:


    "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

    Damn, there go all the newsgroups...

    Bob M.

    LOL!

    --
    Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
    ________________________________________

    Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

  9. On Thu 19 Jan 2006 03:15:30p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it kevnbro?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Quoted message said:

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Best
    Greg

    Whatever happened to "sticks an stones"? Yes, we all know they break
    bones but words people!! Words!!!!

    Just another "rule/law" chipping away at our freedom of speech. kev

    Some "freedom of speech" is perfect fodder for my killfile, especially a
    few in rfc.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
    ________________________________________

    Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

  10. "Bubba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.
    This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet,
    is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of
    Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and
    two years in prison. "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly
    problematic," says Marv
    Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.
    "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else." It's
    illegal to annoy.

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    Well, this was the man (g.w.) who while governor of Texas, said there
    "should be limits to freedom".

    Bubba

    Yep. He's a real Uhmurkin.

  11. Doug Kanter said:

    "Bubba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.
    This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet,
    is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of
    Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and
    two years in prison. "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly
    problematic," says Marv
    Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.
    "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else." It's
    illegal to annoy.

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    Well, this was the man (g.w.) who while governor of Texas, said there
    "should be limits to freedom".

    Bubba

    Yep. He's a real Uhmurkin.

    Personally, I'd rather deal with a terrorist on an airplane than a
    terrorist in the White House.

    Bubba

    --
    You wanna measure or you wanna cook?

  12. "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

    Damn, there go all the newsgroups...

    Bob M.

  13. "Bubba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, this was the man (g.w.) who while governor of Texas, said there
    "should be limits to freedom".

    Bubba

    He actually said something sensible? Will wonders never cease.

    --
    Peter Aitken
    Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

  14. Peter Aitken said:

    "Bubba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, this was the man (g.w.) who while governor of Texas, said there
    "should be limits to freedom".

    Bubba

    He actually said something sensible? Will wonders never cease.

    --
    Peter Aitken
    Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

    I'm calling my lawyer. This announcement really annoys me!

  15. "Bubba" <[email hidden]> wrote :

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Personally, I'd rather deal with a terrorist on an airplane than a
    terrorist in the White House.

    Bubba

    go Bubba! Me too.

  16. Gregory Morrow said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
    you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
    "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate
    telecommunications or other types of communications that are
    transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing
    his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
    person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18
    or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." Buried deep in the new
    law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing
    Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to
    prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity
    and with intent to annoy."

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    LOL. It's okay to do it if you tell them who you are, but they will charge you
    if they can't figure out who they are. That makes sense. :-)

  17. Wayne Boatwright said:

    On Thu 19 Jan 2006 03:15:30p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it kevnbro?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It'll never survive a court test...besides which the courts and law
    enforcement would be FLOODED with complaints of the "AND he called me a
    POOPY HEAD on Usenet....".

    Quoted message said:

    Believe it or not, someone on a Usenet group has already "threatened" me
    with such legal "action"...lol ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Best
    Greg

    Whatever happened to "sticks an stones"? Yes, we all know they break
    bones but words people!! Words!!!!

    Just another "rule/law" chipping away at our freedom of speech. kev

    Some "freedom of speech" is perfect fodder for my killfile, especially a
    few in rfc.

    Like Wayne's never-ending string of unclipped replies and frequent bragging
    about his killfiles.

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Wayne Boatwright wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

    Wayne, do you have a cite for this story?

  19. On Thu 19 Jan 2006 06:10:26p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Stan
    Horwitz?

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Wayne Boatwright wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com said:

    Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke.
    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame someone
    on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real
    name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

    Wayne, do you have a cite for this story?

    Unfortunately, no. It was e-mailed to me by a co-worker.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
    ________________________________________

    Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you!

  20. Stan Horwitz wrote:
    :: In article <[email hidden]>,
    :: Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:
    ::
    ::: Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no
    joke.
    ::: Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on
    posting
    ::: annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    ::: disclosing your true identity. In other words, it's OK to flame
    someone
    ::: on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your
    real
    ::: name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.
    ::
    :: Wayne, do you have a cite for this story?

    http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022491.html?tag=st.util.print

    BOB

    --
    Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.