Power meters · Public discussion

Optimum Cadence for 91% FTP 3x20?

Started by wiredued · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,524 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
11 February 2007
Last activity
11 February 2007
Original author
wiredued
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,524
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have been in a bit of a rut with my 3x20s on the KK at 97rpm in the 52/21 combo (next cog being 18T in the low 80rpm range) until I changed my cassette which allowed me to get back down to about 89 RPM in the 52/19 combo and with a notable power increase. Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?

  2. wiredued said:

    I have been in a bit of a rut with my 3x20s on the KK at 97rpm in the 52/21 combo (next cog being 18T in the low 80rpm range) until I changed my cassette which allowed me to get back down to about 89 RPM in the 52/19 combo and with a notable power increase. Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?


    I like 85 rpms

  3. wiredued said:

    Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?

    Why not mix it up? For instance, I know that I climb at a lower cadence than I ride on the flats, even though the given power may be the same. Likewise, making power at a given cadence feels different between my road bike and my TT rig. Why not get a feel for making power at low cadences and high cadences? You're getting a little too fixated on the issue imho.

  4. wiredued said:

    I have been in a bit of a rut with my 3x20s on the KK at 97rpm in the 52/21 combo (next cog being 18T in the low 80rpm range) until I changed my cassette which allowed me to get back down to about 89 RPM in the 52/19 combo and with a notable power increase. Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?

    I'd have thought cadence of choice was just that - whatever works for you.

    I don't even think about how fast I'm pedalling, nor watch or care that much about it, I just ride with power/RPE. Turns out I ride 'em at ~100rpm. Higher intensity intervals I tend to pedal faster.

  5. I do find myself spending a great deal of my spare time thinking of such things I think I am becoming a cycling geek.🙂

    shawndoggy said:

    Why not get a feel for making power at low cadences and high cadences? You're getting a little too fixated on the issue imho.

  6. This is interesting and makes me wonder what your happy TT cadence is.

    Alex Simmons said:

    I'd have thought cadence of choice was just that - whatever works for you.

    I don't even think about how fast I'm pedalling, nor watch or care that much about it, I just ride with power/RPE. Turns out I ride 'em at ~100rpm. Higher intensity intervals I tend to pedal faster.

  7. wiredued said:

    Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?


    I'm not sure if my self-selected cadence is 'optimum', but I do tend to do trainer SST at 85-90rpm. My self-selected cadence tends to be a little bit lower on the trainer than on the road.

  8. wiredued said:

    happy TT

    ? No such thing😉😄

  9. wiredued said:

    I have been in a bit of a rut with my 3x20s on the KK at 97rpm in the 52/21 combo (next cog being 18T in the low 80rpm range) until I changed my cassette which allowed me to get back down to about 89 RPM in the 52/19 combo and with a notable power increase. Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?

    105rpm on the trainer for SST or L4
    On the road normally 100-110rpm (headwind 90-100rpm, tailwind 105-120rpm)

  10. wiredued said:

    I have been in a bit of a rut with my 3x20s on the KK at 97rpm in the 52/21 combo (next cog being 18T in the low 80rpm range) until I changed my cassette which allowed me to get back down to about 89 RPM in the 52/19 combo and with a notable power increase. Is this the cadence of choice for most riders targeting 91% FTP?


    I use a minimum of 4 different workouts to accomplish the same objective as 20min. intervals -- I live in Maine and do a lot of indoor trainer work and having variety keeps one mentally fresh and also provides a broader metric for assessing progress.

    Best,
    Bill Black

  11. Bill Black said:

    I use a minimum of 4 different workouts to accomplish the same objective as 20min. intervals -- I live in Maine and do a lot of indoor trainer work and having variety keeps one mentally fresh and also provides a broader metric for assessing progress.

    Best,
    Bill Black

    I do all levels at a mixture of cadences, just to have a broader range.

    I have to pay attention or I tend to let my cadence drop.

    But my "favorite", self selected cadence has always been 85, ever since I took my first AT test over a dozen years ago, before I had any preconceptions of what I was "suposed" to be doing. 85 still feels best for Level 4.

    Sorry for the short answer earlier[img]cyclingforums.comicon12.gif[/img]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.