Saddle innovations often promise comfort, yet they can fall short on rugged terrain. When assessing any new design, how do we ensure they’re actually tested in the conditions they claim to excel in? It's crucial to gather real-world feedback from riders who push their limits on gravel. Are there specific metrics or experiences that can clearly indicate whether a saddle genuinely enhances comfort? What role do rider preferences play in determining the success of these innovations? Should we be prioritizing individual needs over trends when considering custom modifications for the Open WI.DE? 
