Road Cycling · Public discussion

Only in Professional Cycling...

Started by Mike Jacoubowsky · · Last activity · 53 posts · 1,629 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 May 2005
Last activity
9 June 2005
Original author
Mike Jacoubowsky
Posts
53
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,629
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 53
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001. What do "normal" people
    (that would specifically exclude anyone here on RBR) think when they hear
    something like that?

    Hmm... by prior admission, anyone on RBR wouldn't know what a normal person
    would think anyway. Maybe I should ask Mike V over in rec.bicycles.soc?
    Perhaps he could build a special habitat for those who test "non negative."
    Would you like to contribute? :>😉

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  2. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001.

    Ah yes, see how the spinmeisters sanitize words. A "non negative" drug test
    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration that
    the Koran was "mishandled."

  3. On Mon, 30 May 2005 02:43:47 GMT, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001. What do "normal" people
    (that would specifically exclude anyone here on RBR) think when they hear
    something like that?

    Seems like I did hear something about his excuse, saying it came from
    eating candy from Brazil, or South America, but didn't believe my ears,
    haha. I'll have to check the replay - I had to leave early and tape the
    last hour.

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm... by prior admission, anyone on RBR wouldn't know what a normal person
    would think anyway. Maybe I should ask Mike V over in rec.bicycles.soc?
    Perhaps he could build a special habitat for those who test "non negative."
    Would you like to contribute? :>😉

    I suppose my first reaction, only paying half-attention would be "oh, Paul
    means his level was below the lower testing cut-off...", quickly followed
    by a double-take. Too bad Bobke didn't jump in and make a wise-crack, like
    'so Paul, what -is- UCI's allowable trace level for cocaine hydrochloride?'

    jj

    Quoted message said:

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  4. "PanFan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001.

    Ah yes, see how the spinmeisters sanitize words. A "non negative" drug
    test
    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration that
    the Koran was "mishandled."

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not even
    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I go
    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not see
    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest against
    the US.

    Stepping off of soapbox... Yes, I find Paul's use of "non-negative" to
    describe a positive as funny as I find his use of "undulating" to describe
    rolling road.

    -p

  5. "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the Koran was "mishandled."

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not


    even

    Quoted message said:

    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I


    go

    Quoted message said:

    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not


    see

    Quoted message said:

    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest


    against

    Quoted message said:

    the US.

    Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.

    http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html

    [Thom Hartmann] OK. I'm wondering, what is your opinion on the legality of
    Guantanamo Bay and what do you think of the construction of a death chamber
    there, which was reported by the BBC yesterday?

    [George Galloway] Well, it's an utterly illegal process which is being
    followed. People are being taken, in some cases from third countries. One of
    the British citizens, for example, was taken from the Gambia. Others have
    been taken from Pakistan. Others still from, from Afghanistan. They're taken
    by force, drugs forcibly injected into them, hooded, chained, and taken to a
    cage in the tropics where by all accounts they're being kept in conditions
    that you wouldn't keep a dog in in your country or mine. And if you did,
    you'd be, you'd be had up for cruelty by the authorities.
    And then there's very clear evidence of systematic torture. There's the
    desecration of the Koran which may or may not have happened, depending on
    which edition of Newsweek you are prepared to believe. This is a big scar on
    the face of the United States. And it seems to me that too few citizens of
    the United States have fastened on to the fact that the protestations by
    your president and your government of being interested in human rights and
    democracy and freedom are quite negated by the very existence of Guantanamo
    Bay.
    But of course, that's not the end of it. Bagram Air Base is exactly the same
    kind of place. Abu Ghraib prison, well we perhaps, on a family show,
    shouldn't probe too deeply into the disgusting obscenities that were going
    on there. And, it turns out, that where the United States itself is not
    prepared to physically torture people, it merely subcontracts out the task;
    sending people to the likes of Uzbekistan and Egypt and other prison states
    where less squeamish governments will torture people for the United States
    and give the U.S. the testimony they get as a result. Which, of course, it
    goes without saying, is almost never of any use because anyone will say
    anything under torture.

  6. Huh? No. not clear. You lost me after "religious offenses".

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Pippen said:

    "PanFan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001.

    Ah yes, see how the spinmeisters sanitize words. A "non negative" drug
    test
    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration that
    the Koran was "mishandled."

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not even
    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I go
    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not see
    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest against
    the US.

    Well, the US has claimed (rather frequently) to have the moral high
    ground on this. Lots of "we're better than those savages" comments were
    made. If you recall, one of the many reasons given for the Iraq invasion
    was that Saddam tortured and mistreated people. When our guys engage in the
    very same sort of behavior (at the very same prison, in fact), it sort of
    falls into the category of "Do as I say, not as I do". Doesn't it seem like
    that kind of behavior puts us and the troops and contractors on the ground
    over in Iraq at greater risk? (Make no mistake, this was known around the
    world long before the Newsweek story (which has turned out to be accurate,
    btw), as detainees who'd been kicked loose were talking about it since
    about mid 2002.)

    Quoted message said:

    Stepping off of soapbox... Yes, I find Paul's use of "non-negative" to
    describe a positive as funny as I find his use of "undulating" to describe
    rolling road.

    What's funny about "undulating"? It's a more descriptive term of a road
    profile than "rolling", I think. From M-W.com:

    Undulate

    3 : to present a wavy appearance

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Butter is love.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  8. Jet said:

    Seems like I did hear something about his excuse, saying it came from
    eating candy from Brazil, or South America, but didn't believe my ears,

    http://www.google.com/search?q=simoni+peruvian+candy

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  9. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Jet said:

    Seems like I did hear something about his excuse, saying it came from
    eating candy from Brazil, or South America, but didn't believe my ears,

    http://www.google.com/search?q=simoni+peruvian+candy

    Heh-heh, pretty funny, especially with the inclusion of the wacky aunt. If
    that hadn't worked, I'm sure we would have heard that he accidently ate a
    couple 100 dollar bills that his aunt had baked in a cake for him as a
    birthday present/practical joke. (of course we all know that there are
    traces of coke on all US $100 bills!) ;-)

    jj

  10. Jet said:

    (of course we all know that there
    are traces of coke on all US $100 bills!) ;-)

    http://www.snopes.com/business/money/cocaine.asp

  11. On Mon, 30 May 2005 12:05:35 +0200, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Jet said:

    (of course we all know that there
    are traces of coke on all US $100 bills!) ;-)

    http://www.snopes.com/business/money/cocaine.asp

    Hah, I thought I was being too obvious with my sarcasm - (I almost put
    'urban legend' in there. Curses. Undone by my penchant for subtle humor.)

    Do you doubt that such an excuse would fail to fool the racing officials,
    though? Sometimes I wonder if the officials don't participate in helping
    them dream up these wacky excuses. "let's see, we haven't used the 'my
    dog's toothache powder got into my peanut butter' excuse in a while, let's
    go with that!"

    jj

  12. "OnTwoWheels" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the Koran was "mishandled."

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not


    even

    Quoted message said:

    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I


    go

    Quoted message said:

    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not


    see

    Quoted message said:

    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest


    against

    Quoted message said:

    the US.

    Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.

    http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html


    <snip>

    Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for being
    part of the Oil for Food program?

    -p


  13. Quoted message said:

    P.S. The U.S. flag is not a religious symbol.

    it is to some people..... not that it's a good or bad thing mind you, it
    is after all just a symbol. OK enough OT chatter from this one.

  14. Pippen said:

    "OnTwoWheels" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    >in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration

    that

    Quoted message said:

    >the Koran was "mishandled."
    >

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not

    even

    Quoted message said:

    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I

    go

    Quoted message said:

    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not

    see

    Quoted message said:

    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest

    against

    Quoted message said:

    the US.

    Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.

    http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html

    <snip>

    Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for being
    part of the Oil for Food program?

    -p


    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=ad%20hominem

  15. Pippen said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for being
    part of the Oil for Food program?

    Tim Lines said:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=ad%20hominem

    The senators are homos ?

  16. "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Pippen said:

    "PanFan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    > It just seems funny as heck to hear Paul Sherwin, on OLN, talk about
    > Simoni's "non negative" test for cocaine in 2001.

    Ah yes, see how the spinmeisters sanitize words. A "non negative" drug
    test
    in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration
    that
    the Koran was "mishandled."

    Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran down
    the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not
    even
    allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should I
    go
    out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not
    see
    if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest
    against
    the US.

    Well, the US has claimed (rather frequently) to have the moral high
    ground on this. Lots of "we're better than those savages" comments were
    made. If you recall, one of the many reasons given for the Iraq invasion
    was that Saddam tortured and mistreated people. When our guys engage in
    the
    very same sort of behavior (at the very same prison, in fact), it sort of
    falls into the category of "Do as I say, not as I do". Doesn't it seem
    like
    that kind of behavior puts us and the troops and contractors on the ground
    over in Iraq at greater risk? (Make no mistake, this was known around the
    world long before the Newsweek story (which has turned out to be accurate,
    btw), as detainees who'd been kicked loose were talking about it since
    about mid 2002.)


    I agee with most of what you are saying. But when it comes to the Koran I
    just don't see the issue. The detainees at Gitmo are being interrogated.
    That's not summer camp... How many Muslims live in the US and go about
    practicing their religion everyday with no interference from the government?
    All I would say. So we have a government that openly accepts Muslims and
    their religion but we flush a few Korans down the commode during
    interrogation and the Muslim world reacts the way it did? Understand that
    neither you nor I know what really is going on at Gitmo and if the US has
    crossed the line then we are wrong. But I find it perfectly okay if not
    required to go to the line. I still maintain that this is just a catalyst
    that some of the Muslim clerics were looking for to create unrest in the
    region.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Stepping off of soapbox... Yes, I find Paul's use of "non-negative" to
    describe a positive as funny as I find his use of "undulating" to
    describe
    rolling road.

    What's funny about "undulating"? It's a more descriptive term of a road
    profile than "rolling", I think. From M-W.com:

    Well, before listening to the crew on OLN I never heard "undulating" used so
    many times in a single paragraph. I found that funny... As far as being
    descriptive... This is taken from www.dictionary.com for the word rolling.

    To move or advance with a rising and falling motion; undulate: The waves
    rolled toward shore.

    Quoted message said:


    Undulate

    3 : to present a wavy appearance

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Butter is love.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

    -p

  17. "Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Pippen said:

    "OnTwoWheels" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >>in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration

    that

    >>the Koran was "mishandled."
    >>
    >
    >Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran
    >down
    >the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not

    even

    >allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should
    >I

    go

    >out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not

    see

    >if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest

    against

    >the US.
    >

    Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.

    http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html

    <snip>

    Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for
    being part of the Oil for Food program?

    -p


    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=ad%20hominem

    Would that mean politics are no longer used to influence? I disagree,
    personal motives do influence what a person says or does. GG is a member of
    English Parliament, how does he know anything about Gitmo? I heard him
    enough to C-SPAN to know that he has an axe to grind with the US.

    -p

  18. Quoted post said:
    Quoted message said:

    I would like my country to set an example for repressive,
    backward societies by BEHAVING BETTER THAN THEM.

    Me too, but I'm quite unsure you are aware of the full scope of
    "behaving better," including that of domestic affairs.

    "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that
    article in the Constitution which granted a
    right to Congress of expending, on objects
    of benevolence, the money of their consti-
    tuents..... With respect to the words general
    welfare, I have always regarded them as qual-
    ified by the detail of powers connected with
    them. To take them in a literal and unlimited
    sense would be a metamorphosis of the Consti-
    tution into a character which there is a host
    of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."
    --James Madison, 1791

    And from the last good president:

    "I can find no warrant for such an appropriation
    in the Constitution, and I do not believe that
    the power and duty of the General Government
    ought to be extended to the relief of individual
    suffering which is in no manner properly related
    to the public service or benefit.... The friend-
    liness and charity of our countrymen can always
    be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens
    in misfortune. This has been repeatedly and quite
    lately demonstrated. Federal aid in such cases
    encourages the expectation of paternal care on
    the part of the Government and weakens the sturd-
    iness of our national character, while it prevents
    the indulgence among our people of that kindly
    sentiment and conduct which strengthens the bonds
    of a common brotherhood.... Though the people
    support the Government, the Government should not
    support the people."
    Grover Cleveland, 1887

  19. Pippen said:

    "Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Pippen said:

    "OnTwoWheels" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >"Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    >>>in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration
    >
    >that
    >
    >
    >>>the Koran was "mishandled."
    >>>
    >>
    >>Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran
    >>down
    >>the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are not
    >
    >even
    >
    >
    >>allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found. Should
    >>I
    >
    >go
    >
    >
    >>out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why not
    >
    >see
    >
    >
    >>if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest
    >
    >against
    >
    >
    >>the US.
    >>
    >
    >Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    >inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.
    >
    >http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html
    >

    <snip>

    Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for
    being part of the Oil for Food program?

    -p

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=ad%20hominem

    Would that mean politics are no longer used to influence?

    No, that would mean that you're attacking the messenger, ignoring the
    message.

  20. "Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Pippen said:

    "Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pippen wrote:

    >"OnTwoWheels" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    >>"Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >>news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >>
    >>>>in cycling strikes me the same way as did the Pentagon's declaration
    >>
    >>that
    >>
    >>
    >>>>the Koran was "mishandled."
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>Why does everyone get their panties in a twist when we flush a Koran
    >>>down
    >>>the crapper? How many US flags have other nations burnt? Bibles are
    >>>not
    >>
    >>even
    >>
    >>
    >>>allowed in most Muslim countries, presumably destroyed if found.
    >>>Should I
    >>
    >>go
    >>
    >>
    >>>out and start a protest that gets people killed because of this? Why
    >>>not
    >>
    >>see
    >>
    >>
    >>>if for what it is, Muslim clerics looking for a catalyst to protest
    >>
    >>against
    >>
    >>
    >>>the US.
    >>>
    >>
    >>Everybody makes a big stink about the Koran and the reality of the
    >>inhumanity and torture going on there is trivialized.
    >>
    >>http://www.thomhartmann.com/Galloway_Interview.html
    >>
    >
    ><snip>
    >
    >Is the same George Galloway that is under investigation by the US for
    >being part of the Oil for Food program?
    >
    >-p

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=ad%20hominem

    Would that mean politics are no longer used to influence?

    No, that would mean that you're attacking the messenger, ignoring the
    message.

    This is my last post on this one. First you say "No" that you do not believe
    politics are used to influence people. I still disagree. Second, I always
    examine the messenger to determine the validity of the message. If you do
    not then I applaud you innocence but question your gullibility.

    You may have the last word.

    -p

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.