Road Cycling · Public discussion

OLN's Ambition

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 8 posts · 297 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
20 August 2005
Last activity
21 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
297
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    ABCs of the NHL's deal with OLN:

    If ESPN was unwilling to plunk down $60 million for national cable
    rights to the upcoming NHL season, why was OLN willing to up the ante
    to $65 million and guarantee another $70 million for the 2006-07
    season?

    That's simple. At retail establishments such as Wal-Mart et al, its
    called dangling a loss leader.

    In the TV biz, its called trolling for eyeballs.

    OLN needs programming to try to establish itself as a player in the
    cable sports market place. The annual July joie de vivre the Tour De
    France brings OLN isn't quite enough. And now that the Tour will be
    sans Lance Armstrong, its impact is certain to be lessened.

    Enter the NHL, which will supply OLN with eight months of anchor
    programming. At ESPN, the NHL lost whatever juice it had when the NBA
    signed on. The NHL was a guppy in the ESPN empire. At OLN, hockey will
    be the big fish.

    The NHL could be to OLN what the NFL was to Fox when it jumped on board
    in 1994. On a much smaller plane. That's what OLN is banking on.

    "Hopefully this will be a pivotal moment in OLN history," NHL
    commissioner Gary Bettman said via conference call. OLN executives on
    the call seconded the emotion.

    OLN, which for obvious reasons has officially changed its name from the
    Outdoor Life Network, may use the NHL as a springboard to trying to
    acquire rights to other relatively mainstream sports. The NFL is
    expected to put up for bid an eight-game Thursday-Saturday night
    package beginning in 2006. OLN, owned and backed by the Comcast Cable
    empire, is expected to be a player in the bidding. And there is NASCAR,
    whose rights fees will soon be up for bid.

    Add the slices of the NFL and NASCAR to the NHL and, voila, upstart,
    dreamy-eyed OLN will have a foothold in the marketplace dominated by
    ESPN.

    More the merrier: It is also OLN's most fervent hope that its NHL deal
    will spur cable providers that don't carry the network to sign on. OLN
    is available to 64 million homes nationwide compared to ESPN's 90
    million. Comcast and Charter, giants in Dallas-Fort Worth, both offer
    OLN as do satellite providers DirecTV and Dish Network.

    If you're a hockey fan and have cable but can't get OLN, the idea is to
    have you pester your cable company into picking up the network.

    ESPN says farewell: George Bodenheimer, the president of ESPN, offered
    this parting shot: "... given the prolonged work stoppage and the
    league's TV ratings history, no financial model even remotely supports
    the contract terms offered. We wish the NHL all the best."

    For the record, the NHL averaged a 0.5 rating on ESPN and a 0.2 on
    ESPN2 in 2003-04. ESPN replacement programming during last season's
    lockout actually did better in the ratings.

    On the flip side, OLN doesn't have a single regular show that averages
    as much as a 0.5 rating. OLN hopes to juice ratings by putting mikes on
    players and coaches, taking viewers into the dressing rooms and
    conducting in-game interviews.

    Looking ahead: OLN has an option for a third NHL season in 2007-08 for
    $72.5 million. ... In addition to the planned 58 regular-season games
    on Monday and Tuesday nights, OLN will offer the All-Star Game as well
    as wall-to-wall playoff coverage, including the first two games of the
    Stanley Cup finals. NBC will pick up the postseason from there.

    Cable flashback: And finally: Remember SportsChannel America? Didn't
    think so.

    In 1988, SportsChannel America outbid ESPN for NHL rights. It paid the
    league $56 million for four seasons. SportsChannel America hoped the
    NHL would be its entrée into cable homes. It didn't work. The network
    died and the NHL returned to ESPN in 1992.

  2. email hidden said:
    Quoted message said:

    From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a microphone
    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    jj

  3. "Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:
    Quoted message said:

    From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a


    microphone

    Quoted message said:

    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    jj


    actually they tried something like that that would illuminate the puck and
    leave a flare so you could see it's track on screen- keyword: tried

    curious: how does this relate to nhl in canada ? cbc, or oln ? ( ps. I hate
    hockey )

    Laz

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jet said:
    email hidden said:
    Quoted message said:

    From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a microphone
    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    I _love_ watching ice hockey. Watch the players away from
    the puck, and you will always know where it is; plus you
    will see the whole game. Tape a game and put it in front
    of your trainer this winter. The action goes continuously
    for one to four minutes typically. Even watching the
    jostling previous to puck drop of the face-off is good;
    see those defensemen elbowing each other? The aggression
    in ice hockey is more open and more acknowledged too. Guys
    drop the gloves and _fight_.

    And lest we dwell entirely on the violence and the
    impression that of all athletes hockey players seem the
    least intelligent, hockey is a subtle game of position not
    unlike chess; two games that I understand.

    Born a Red Wing fan.

    --
    Michael Press

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael Press said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jet said:
    email hidden said:

    >From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a microphone
    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    I _love_ watching ice hockey. Watch the players away from
    the puck, and you will always know where it is; plus you
    will see the whole game. Tape a game and put it in front
    of your trainer this winter. The action goes continuously
    for one to four minutes typically. Even watching the
    jostling previous to puck drop of the face-off is good;
    see those defensemen elbowing each other? The aggression
    in ice hockey is more open and more acknowledged too. Guys
    drop the gloves and _fight_.

    What are you talking about? Fighting is heavily penalized in hockey. Any
    players caught fighting are sent off for _five_ minutes. Two more if
    there was roughing involved.

    Quoted message said:

    And lest we dwell entirely on the violence and the
    impression that of all athletes hockey players seem the
    least intelligent, hockey is a subtle game of position not
    unlike chess; two games that I understand.

    Fast, anaerobic, full-contact, and continuous action. What's not to like?

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Laz said:

    "Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    >From dallasnews.com

    Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish

    NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a


    microphone

    Quoted message said:

    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    jj


    actually they tried something like that that would illuminate the puck and
    leave a flare so you could see it's track on screen- keyword: tried

    Fox sports used that gimmick. I saw a game done that way, and it was
    weird for a long-time hockey watcher. The idea was so unpopular in
    Canada that one beer company did an ad parodying it.

    The conventional wisdom is that no game will benefit from HD
    presentation more than hockey: the puck will be easily visible, and the
    game's sense of speed and power will work very well as a TV game
    otherwise.

    Quoted message said:

    curious: how does this relate to nhl in canada ? cbc, or oln ? ( ps. I hate
    hockey )

    I have no idea whether OLN's game package includes Canadian rights, or
    whether we will get blackouts and bull-riding. Hockey is so big in
    Canada that the CBC carries Saturday-night doubleheaders and primary
    rights to playoff games, but TSN (the sports network) has a separate
    national-broadcast hockey deal for selected other games, and Sportsnet
    has regional-broadcast rights for several teams, including my beloved
    Vancouver Canucks.

    At least, that's how I think it works. I can't find updated info on the
    NHL's Canadian TV contracts.

    -RjC.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos


  7. Quoted message said:


    What are you talking about? Fighting is heavily penalized in hockey. Any
    players caught fighting are sent off for _five_ minutes. Two more if
    there was roughing involved.


    while fighting is penalized, the 5 minute major is less common. It's
    generally saved for truly heinous offenses. Roughing is the dominant
    penalty called. It's generally acknowledged that the fight is an
    important part of the game since it allows two players to vent what
    might be called dangerous aggression within the rules of the game.

    FM - who also likes hockey.... speed, skill and controlled (mostly..)
    aggression. Combined with action that doesn't stop regularly, and a game
    where the last team to touch the "ball" doesn't win (biscuitball
    anyone..?) what's not to like? Till bike racing starts up again of
    course......

  8. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Ryan Cousineau said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael Press said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jet said:

    On 20 Aug 2005 15:33:27 -0700, "[email hidden]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >>From dallasnews.com
    >
    >
    >Hot Air: OLN reels in big fish
    >
    >NHL becomes network anchor after guppy run at ESPN

    Thought you mostly couldn't see a hockey puck on TV...

    Maybe they'll put a GPS on it or something or use CGI...or put a microphone
    on it, like the ones on players... ;-D

    I _love_ watching ice hockey. Watch the players away from
    the puck, and you will always know where it is; plus you
    will see the whole game. Tape a game and put it in front
    of your trainer this winter. The action goes continuously
    for one to four minutes typically. Even watching the
    jostling previous to puck drop of the face-off is good;
    see those defensemen elbowing each other? The aggression
    in ice hockey is more open and more acknowledged too. Guys
    drop the gloves and _fight_.

    What are you talking about? Fighting is heavily penalized in hockey. Any
    players caught fighting are sent off for _five_ minutes. Two more if
    there was roughing involved.

    Quoted message said:

    And lest we dwell entirely on the violence and the
    impression that of all athletes hockey players seem the
    least intelligent, hockey is a subtle game of position not
    unlike chess; two games that I understand.

    Fast, anaerobic, full-contact, and continuous action. What's not to like?

    And the following are expressly forbidden in the rule book.

    Roughing
    Kicking
    Kneeing
    Elbowing
    Head butting
    Tripping
    Spearing
    Butt-ending
    Slashing
    High sticking
    Hooking
    Playing with a broken stick
    Boarding
    Hitting from behind
    Hitting after the whistle
    Checking from behind
    Cross checking
    Charging
    Hip checking
    Clipping
    Throwing a stick
    Swinging a stick
    Spitting

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.