Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Old Colnago questions?

Started by Ted · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,066 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 October 2003
Last activity
22 October 2003
Original author
Ted
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,066
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern components. I
    originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called at the time. Did
    they make more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame angles?
    I think the frame is made of either Columbus SP or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    Thanks for any info, Ted

  2. Ted said:

    I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern components. I
    originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called at the time. Did
    they make more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame
    angles? I think the frame is made of either Columbus SP or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    The standard model of the era was the Colnago Super, which was a Columbus SP/SL frame. That is to
    say 50cm would be SL and 63 were SP.

    Like any conscientious builder, the middle sizes of a Colnago should be mixed gauge. SP/SL is
    intended to allow the builder a continuum, with progressivley more SP tubes as the frame size
    increases. So SL is not "better" than SP. The main tubes are 0.9-0.6-0.9 versus 1.0-0.7-1.0.

    IIRC, a 1980 looks similar to this 1990, full chrome fork but without the chromed lugs, right?

    yellowjersey.org90COLNAG.JPG

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. A Muzi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ted said:

    I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern components.
    I originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called at the time.
    Did they make more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame
    angles? I think the frame is made of either Columbus SP or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    The standard model of the era was the Colnago Super, which was a Columbus SP/SL frame. That is to
    say 50cm would be SL and 63 were SP.

    Like any conscientious builder, the middle sizes of a Colnago should be mixed gauge. SP/SL is
    intended to allow the builder a continuum, with progressivley more SP tubes as the frame size
    increases. So SL is not "better" than SP. The main tubes are 0.9-0.6-0.9 versus 1.0-0.7-1.0.

    IIRC, a 1980 looks similar to this 1990, full chrome fork but without the chromed lugs, right?

    yellowjersey.org90COLNAG.JPG

    The frame looks pretty similar to that one, except that at the top of the chain stays instead of a
    clover leaf cut-out it has "Colnago". The top of the fork crown has a clover leaf cut-out as well as
    on the bottom of the bottom bracket. The lugs on the 1990 look the same as mine do. The bike has
    been repainted and I don't remember exactly what the original paint job looked like, it's been about
    10 years since it was painted.

    Thanks for the info, Ted

  4. "Ted" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern components. I
    originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called at the time. Did
    they make more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame
    angles? I think the frame is made of either Columbus SP or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    Thanks for any info, Ted

    Your bike have the folded, spindled, and mutilated tubeset (ie: the DT and TT are diamond-ish
    shape)? If so, then it probably isn't SL/SP.

    Mike

  5. "Mike S." <mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet> wrote in message news:jXwlb.72519$vj2.2098@fed1read06...

    Quoted message said:


    "Ted" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern components.
    I originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called at the time.
    Did they


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame angles? I
    think the frame is made of either Columbus


    SP

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    Thanks for any info, Ted

    Your bike have the folded, spindled, and mutilated tubeset (ie: the DT


    and

    Quoted message said:

    TT are diamond-ish shape)? If so, then it probably isn't SL/SP.

    IIRC, The next greatest thing in 1981 was SLX and not the fluted stuff whose name escapes me now.
    But, as Andrew says, the Super was made with SL or SP in 1981. I think all sizes were made with SL.

    This was a dark period for Colnoago. Bikeology was selling the Super for $299 or thereabouts via
    mail order. The paint was bad and so was the craftsmanship. I was thinking of buying one just
    because they were comparatively cheap, but I was worried about getting a large frame made with SL.
    Nowadays, SL is the equivalent of galvanized water pipe in the minds of the ultra-light crowd. I
    think trans-con touring bikes are now made out of SL. Oh, how things change. -- Jay Beattie.

  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a 1981 Colnago frame that I use for riding that is built up with more modern
    components. I originally bought the frame in 1981, but I don't know what the model was called
    at the time. Did they


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    more than one model then? It is a 59cm c-t size frame, does anyone know the frame angles? I
    think the frame is made of either Columbus


    SP

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or SL tubing. Does anybody know which?

    Thanks for any info, Ted

    Your bike have the folded, spindled, and mutilated tubeset (ie: the DT


    and

    Quoted message said:

    TT are diamond-ish shape)? If so, then it probably isn't SL/SP.

    IIRC, The next greatest thing in 1981 was SLX and not the fluted stuff whose name escapes me
    now. But, as Andrew says, the Super was made with SL or SP in 1981. I think all sizes were made
    with SL.

    This was a dark period for Colnoago. Bikeology was selling the Super for $299 or thereabouts via
    mail order. The paint was bad and so was the craftsmanship. I was thinking of buying one just
    because they were comparatively cheap, but I was worried about getting a large frame made with SL.

    Nowadays, SL is the equivalent of galvanized water pipe in the

    Quoted message said:

    minds of the ultra-light crowd. I think trans-con touring bikes are now made out of SL. Oh, how
    things change. -- Jay Beattie.


    Ain't that the truth!

    I still lust after a Master Olympic in blue and gold with Superbe Pro parts... Mmmmmm, Colnago....

    Wasn't the tubing called "Gilco" or something like that?

    Mike

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.