UK and Europe · Public discussion

Oh dear

Started by lardyninja · · Last activity · 31 posts · 892 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
21 November 2006
Last activity
25 November 2006
Original author
lardyninja
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
892
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–31 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Paul Boyd said:

    I don't think I've ever asked people to take me seriously :-)

    Life's too short!

    On the one hand, quite reasonable, but on the other is the fact that
    people will be taking you seriously whether you want them to or not...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  2. Quoted message said:

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1999258.ece

    Warning: Contains h*lm*ts

    "...65 per cent less likely to suffer brain damage and almost 75 per cent
    less likely to sustain a serious brain injury if you wear a helmet."

    Hmm, have BHIT finally stopped sending out the 'wrong' figures for that
    study?

  3. lardyninja ([email hidden]) wrote:
    : James Daley has lost the plot...

    : http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1999258.ece

    Sent to [email hidden]:

    ***
    James Daley is worried about cyclists not wearing helmets.

    I for my part am constantly amazed by the number of
    pedestrians in Britain who still don't bother to wear a
    helmet. For too many, it still comes down to a matter of
    fashion or merely apathy.

    After all, in the UK walking a mile is more likely to get
    you seriously injured or killed than cycling a mile,
    according to government statistics.

    Or could it be possible that Mr. Daley doesn't base his
    assessment of which risks need mitigating so much on data
    but rather on the marketing hype surrounding a product?

    ***

  4. Paul Boyd usenet.dont.work@plusnet said:

    Peter Clinch said the following on 22/11/2006 09:36:

    Quoted message said:

    But they really /are/ important, or you just invite people to not
    take you seriously.

    I don't think I've ever asked people to take me seriously :-)

    Life's too short!

    "Do you know who I am? DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?"

    "No but Matron will be along shortly and I'm sure she'll be able to
    tell you."

    Chris
    --
    Chris Eilbeck

  5. in message <[email hidden]>, Peter Fox

    (') said:

    Following on from Tony Raven's message. . .

    Quoted message said:

    Dim Dave wrote on 21/11/2006 18:39 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    I have been cycling in London for 40 years (as of this summer) I have
    never ever worn a cycle helmet. I don't like them. But Mr Daley -
    whoever he is - makes what will seem to a lot of people a reasonable
    case.

    He demolishes the notion which I often rely on in arguments that
    studies
    show compulsory helmet laws make cycling less polular. Is he right in
    what he says about the introduction of the law in Australia? Does
    anybody here know the facts of this and where those facts might be
    published?

    There are so many factual errors in his article it is difficult to know
    where to start but no, he is wrong about Australia. If you want to read
    up about it then http://www.cyclehelmets.org covers it all including the
    evidence and counter-evidence from Australia.

    Surely this is within the remit of the Press Complaints Commission.

    A list of errors doesn't have to go into detail just a reference to the
    appropriate section in www.cyclehelmets.org.

    If the editor doesn't fess-up then complaining is easy.

    The first item of the Code Of practice is given below.

    Free and easy, but I don't have the rebuttal matters at my finger tips.

    Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; Drivers in the UK kill more people every single year than
    ;; Al Qaeda have ever killed worldwide in any single year.

  6. Quoted message said:

    Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?

    I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.

    --
    This is a work-displacement activity. Expect lengthy replies until the
    deadline has passed.

  7. Mark Thompson wrote on 23/11/2006 00:23 +0100:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?

    I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.

    Perhaps we should rename this group uk.rec.displacementactivity ;-)

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  8. in message <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven

    (') said:

    Mark Thompson wrote on 23/11/2006 00:23 +0100:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?

    I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.

    Perhaps we should rename this group uk.rec.displacementactivity ;-)

    Oh, [censored], that is /much/ too close to the mark. I'm suffering from an
    imminent deadline and a bug in an IBM runtime system I can't find a
    workaround for.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; when in the [censored], the wise man plants courgettes

  9. Simon Brooke wrote on 23/11/2006 14:52 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven

    (') said:

    Mark Thompson wrote on 23/11/2006 00:23 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    > Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?
    I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.


    Perhaps we should rename this group uk.rec.displacementactivity ;-)

    Oh, [censored], that is /much/ too close to the mark. I'm suffering from an
    imminent deadline and a bug in an IBM runtime system I can't find a
    workaround for.

    So pick a topic to displace onto and press send ;-)

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  10. lardyninja said:

    James Daley has lost the plot...

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1999258.ece

    Warning: Contains h*lm*ts

    Very pleased to see Malcolm Wardlaw's response in this Friday's Independent
    given top billing in the letters page. It was an excellent, careful and
    moderate rebuttal.

    Even more pleased because I'd forgotten all about the issue when I bought
    the paper.

    A

  11. "Ambrose Nankivell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    lardyninja said:

    James Daley has lost the plot...

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1999258.ece

    Warning: Contains h*lm*ts

    Very pleased to see Malcolm Wardlaw's response in this Friday's


    Independent

    Quoted message said:

    given top billing in the letters page. It was an excellent, careful and
    moderate rebuttal.

    Even more pleased because I'd forgotten all about the issue when I bought
    the paper.

    A


    It would be even better if we could have a column.

    --
    David Lloyd,
    The pub is responsible for my opinions.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.