I don't think I've ever asked people to take me seriously :-)
Life's too short!
On the one hand, quite reasonable, but on the other is the fact that people will be taking you seriously whether you want them to or not...
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
*** James Daley is worried about cyclists not wearing helmets.
I for my part am constantly amazed by the number of pedestrians in Britain who still don't bother to wear a helmet. For too many, it still comes down to a matter of fashion or merely apathy.
After all, in the UK walking a mile is more likely to get you seriously injured or killed than cycling a mile, according to government statistics.
Or could it be possible that Mr. Daley doesn't base his assessment of which risks need mitigating so much on data but rather on the marketing hype surrounding a product?
I have been cycling in London for 40 years (as of this summer) I have never ever worn a cycle helmet. I don't like them. But Mr Daley - whoever he is - makes what will seem to a lot of people a reasonable case.
He demolishes the notion which I often rely on in arguments that studies show compulsory helmet laws make cycling less polular. Is he right in what he says about the introduction of the law in Australia? Does anybody here know the facts of this and where those facts might be published?
There are so many factual errors in his article it is difficult to know where to start but no, he is wrong about Australia. If you want to read up about it then http://www.cyclehelmets.org covers it all including the evidence and counter-evidence from Australia.
Surely this is within the remit of the Press Complaints Commission.
A list of errors doesn't have to go into detail just a reference to the appropriate section in www.cyclehelmets.org.
If the editor doesn't fess-up then complaining is easy.
The first item of the Code Of practice is given below.
Free and easy, but I don't have the rebuttal matters at my finger tips.
Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this?
-- [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; Drivers in the UK kill more people every single year than ;; Al Qaeda have ever killed worldwide in any single year.
I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.
Perhaps we should rename this group uk.rec.displacementactivity ;-)
Oh, [censored], that is /much/ too close to the mark. I'm suffering from an imminent deadline and a bug in an IBM runtime system I can't find a workaround for.
> Would anyone like to co-operate with me on this? I've got a fair bit of work to do at the mo, so yeah I'm game.
Perhaps we should rename this group uk.rec.displacementactivity ;-)
Oh, [censored], that is /much/ too close to the mark. I'm suffering from an imminent deadline and a bug in an IBM runtime system I can't find a workaround for.
So pick a topic to displace onto and press send ;-)
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
Very pleased to see Malcolm Wardlaw's response in this Friday's Independent given top billing in the letters page. It was an excellent, careful and moderate rebuttal.
Even more pleased because I'd forgotten all about the issue when I bought the paper.