John said:Bob said:John said:On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:12:15 -0500, Bob <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Carol T wrote:
>
>>Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
>>
>>>Carol. Steve is being funny. You've heard of funny...? Ok, read about it...? All right,
>>>rumors about it...?
>>
>>Dear Bob,
>>
>>There's a lot of truth about oneself written by the satirist. The humour comes from their
>>hidden pain.
>
>Ya know, there's a lot of truth in any good writing, fact or fiction, and pain in most
>assuredly not a necessary pre-condition. As a professional writer with thousands of pieces
>published (including one on the nature of food humor, for an encyclopedia), I've studied the
>subject rather deeply, from both a technical viewpoint and from a production approach. Many of
>my newspaper columns have been humorous.
>
>A whole lot of humor comes from a fine sense of the absurd. From a grasp of the essential
>silliness of most people including the humorist.If you describe yourself as a student of humor, then this should apply to you as well, should it
not? What I am saying with my mirror suggestion is that you don't seem to be doing that in the
newsgroup.Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>From a subtle understanding that virtually nobody is what they seem and almost certainly not
>what they claim. Spotlighting those things can either be funny, if they're perceived as such,
>or sad, if perceived that way. I mostly see things as funny. And I mostly see the doings of
>most people as funny, at least until they demonstrate malice and dishonesty. Then it's
>legitimate to use humor to spotlight and deflate them.Bob, you need to get a mirror -- and use it.
Oh, look. Here's "John" lecturing about how to present oneself. Please note the two sentences
above that characterize you and what happens therefrom: "And I mostly see the doings of most
people as funny, at least until they demonstrate malice and dishonesty. Then it's legitimate to
use humor to spotlight and deflate them." You get the deflation treatment, "John," because you
earned it.Ahhh, the old fashioned way.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:IMHO, some of the best
humor is of the self deprecating sort.Right. Your opinion is one of the ones I deeply cherish and respect... Bwahahahahaha. Free,
deprecatory advice from an anonymous poster.I'm sure you'd like to see me deprecate myself.
Who knows, it might even be funny. ;-) But don't get your hopes up.
Quoted message said:Elsewhere, where there are more honest people with generous intent, I do. Here where there are
trolls, frauds, sanctimonious preachers and bottom-feeders, I poke at them. It's more useful as a
public service. Sorry you get a good bit of the brunt of it, but then it's only appropriate.Quoted message said:On this news group I've seen
no evidence of your using that whatsoever -- quite the contrary, in fact.That's because, "John," you're one of the frauds noted above. You prattle your agenda with scant
attention to fact and even less attention to balance. I'm not amusing you because I'm not trying
to amuse you.Quoted message said:[rest of your best posting to this group ever - deleted to save bandwidth]
<LOL> Just like Chung's posting his replies to me to other newsgroups not involved in the
discussion for my "convenience." "John" has done a new rhetorical stunt, "damning with faint
praise." Considerably more intelligent than his usual ([censored] for tat). Saving bandwidth. People
still say that as though it actually had meaning like it did with 300 baud modems. A more honest
approach is to say, "...deleted because I want to."Well, I did praise your post (but not this one). Faint praise is about all I ever give. But I do
my best not to damn. When I mention bandwidth here I am talking about the only bandwidth that
really counts and that is in the minds of all the readers of this newsgroup - who knows, there
might be 4 or 5 left? Your post is right above mine in the newsgroup message list and most readers
will see your post first and then mine. If they wish to re-read what you said (for whatever
reason?) it is very easy to do. This way I can also avoid being accused of changing your posts.Quoted message said:<LOL> Good old sincere "John." Here's a good descriptor for you, "John." "...virtually nobody is
what they seem and almost certainly not what they claim." So when are you going to come out from
behind that fake name and be a stand-up guy?I won't do that until the neighborhood improves. Why do you even care about the identity of a
"fraud", someone with "confused opinions", a "prattler", someone who demonstrates "malice and
dishonesty"?Quoted message said:If you didn't confuse your opinions with fact, if you didn't always take the extreme position, if
you didn't exclude any vision but your own, if you didn't assume that what you think is all that
can be thought about a subject, you might get some respect. At this point, I see you as a more
intelligent, less snotty alternative to Chung, but just as out there. Bad company to associate
yourself with.Yes, there is bad company around here. But I am not here to witness to the already saved.
Again....thanks, Bob, for the opportunity to continue to witness. You might have noticed that I
have yet to start a thread here.John
Your composure continues to glorify God, brother.
As for who (or how many) are reading this, know the following:
God is.
(along with the countless lurkers now and in the archive-accessing future :-)
May God continue to bless you and yours today and every day, in Christ's name.
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.comOpen ↗
--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.comOpen ↗
What is all this about?
makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.comOpen ↗