Home Power meters Odd power discerpancy - pls help
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Power meters
Published 7 June 2006
Last activity 7 June 2006
Original author peterwright
Posts 6
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 879
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–6 of 6 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post peterwright
Archived post
7 June 2006, 12:09 UTC
#1
I have two power files from a rider, both performed on the same PT300 indoor trainer but 8 weeks apart (testing) They are identical 20 min TT efforts. The figures have me confused;
TT1 211AP 11.39km 34.3kmh 86 Cad
TT2 208AP 13.86km 41kmh 102 Cad
Can anyone explain why the power for the second TT is lower but the distance travelled 2.4km farther ? The only significant difference lies in the cadence.
7 June 2006, 12:34 UTC
#2
Maybe he turned his cooling fan off on the second one. You know, to cut down the headwind? 😉
Actually, it appears that the internal resistance of the stationary bike was on a different setting for the second run.
7 June 2006, 12:39 UTC
#3
frenchyge said: Maybe he turned his cooling fan off on the second one. You know, to cut down the headwind? 😉
Actually, it appears that the internal resistance of the stationary bike was on a different setting for the second run.
But it's a PT equipped indoor bike - the PT simply measures the power at the hub therefore more resistance = more power ?
7 June 2006, 12:46 UTC
#4
peterwright said: But it's a PT equipped indoor bike - the PT simply measures the power at the hub therefore more resistance = more power ?
Power is torque * rounds/sec.
Obviously in the second test the resistance was lower, rpm was higher and thus also mileage was higher, but the torque * rounds/sec was constant.
7 June 2006, 12:56 UTC
#5
sidewind said: Power is torque * rounds/sec.
Obviously in the second test the resistance was lower, rpm was higher and thus also mileage was higher, but the torque * rounds/sec was constant.
Thanks for the explanation.
So in terms of work done - the rider actually did less in the 2nd TT than the first - as indicated by the Pave ?
7 June 2006, 13:02 UTC
#6
peterwright said: Thanks for the explanation.
So in terms of work done - the rider actually did less in the 2nd TT than the first - as indicated by the Pave ?
Work done = Pave * effort_duration
So wether both TTs were exactly the same duration, then the lower Pave results also less work done.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.