Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Odd - but is it a good idea?

Started by Sparky · · Last activity · 40 posts · 1,213 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
23 May 2004
Last activity
26 May 2004
Original author
Sparky
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,213
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't
    what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty
    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail riding.

    Thanks,

    Sparky

    --
    In the end it is all ok. If it is not ok, then it is not the end.

  2. "Sparky" <[email hidden]>wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this


    "Lefty

    Quoted message said:

    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel,
    right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount
    of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty
    design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some, and
    the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be
    lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. 🙂

  3. "Lenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sparky" <[email hidden]>wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this


    "Lefty

    Quoted message said:

    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel,
    right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount
    of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty
    design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some,


    and

    Quoted message said:

    the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be
    lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. 🙂

    Lenny:
    Thanks for the input - I was kinda thinking the same as you - but the guys
    in the bike shop pointed out that cars have "one sided" front suspension
    system (no dual sided forks on the front tires of my truck) and they pointed
    out that the front folding wheels of jets have the same unilateral
    system.... - it's still odd to me... :-)

    Sparky

    Quoted message said:


  4. Sparky said:

    Lenny:
    Thanks for the input - I was kinda thinking the same as you - but the guys
    in the bike shop pointed out that cars have "one sided" front suspension
    system (no dual sided forks on the front tires of my truck)

    Not quite. The typical front suspension on cars has two arms that hold
    the spindle.

    Quoted message said:

    and they pointed
    out that the front folding wheels of jets have the same unilateral
    system....

    Again, not quite. Many planes use some sort of folding triangular
    syspension, not a simple shock. They also don't use it to steer with.
    And planes don't drive on the ground.... The standards for jet landing
    surfaces are far more stringent than most mountain bike trails. :-)

    My take on those is that I wouldn't own one. You're asking a shock to do
    lots - it has to handle steering torque, shock absorbtion, flex,
    off-center loads.... Just seems easier to use two arms. Any failure in
    the shock is likely to be catastrophic.

    --Kamus

    --
    o__ | May your trails be dim, lonesome, stony, narrow, winding and
    ,>/'_ | only slightly uphill. May the wind bring rain for the slickrock
    (_)\(_) | potholes fourteen miles on the other side of yonder blue ridge.
    | May God's dog serenade your campfire, may the rattlesnake and
    o | the screech owl amuse your reveries, may the Great Sun dazzle

    Quoted message said:

    [] | your eyes by day and the Great Bear watch over you at night.


    /\ |
    \ \ | - Edward Abbey, Beyond the Wall

  5. In article <rrYrc.567642$oR5.422622@pd7tw3no>,

    Sparky said:

    Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't
    what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty
    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    Looks weird, but Cannondale has been making Leftys for some time, and
    the feedback is almost universally positive. The fork is a winner by the
    accounts I have read, though I haven't looked up reliability reports.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/
    President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  6. Lenny said:

    "Sparky" <[email hidden]>wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this


    "Lefty

    Quoted message said:

    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    It's the system with a single shock absorber on one side of the wheel,
    right? Well, the sceptic in me says the fork will develop a certain amount
    of play as it wears. How much is hard to say, it's probably a heavy-duty
    design after all, but I think it's unavoidable to not at least get some, and
    the whole thing looks rather gimmicky to me. I suppose it's meant to be
    lighter than a bike with a standard dual shock fork. 🙂

    I ride a "normal" fork with 2 pistons but only in 1 is an air-spring the
    other is just show. I had to replace the bearing in the fork about every
    6 months.
    Only more expensive forks have in both legs air- or steel-springs.
    The damping is allways asymetrical. One leg damps the compression, the
    other damps the expansion (optional)
    Normally you would expect a symetrical design in a symetrical fork.

    I would prefer rather a one legged fork where everything is in it
    instead of a fork which pretends to have everything which it doesn't.

    Greetings, Urs

    --
    +-------------------------
    | Urs Weder
    | N 47°23'23" E 9°39'47"
    +-------------------------
    ( modify address for return email )

  7. Kamus of Kadizhar said:

    Again, not quite. Many planes use some sort of folding triangular
    syspension, not a simple shock.

    True.

    Quoted message said:

    They also don't use it to steer with.

    So what, planes only go in staright lines when taxi-ing into the hanger,
    or taxi-ing onto the runway?

    Quoted message said:

    And planes don't drive on the ground....

    Again, do they float or something?

    Quoted message said:

    My take on those is that I wouldn't own one. You're asking a shock to
    do lots - it has to handle steering torque, shock absorbtion, flex,
    off-center loads.... Just seems easier to use two arms. Any failure in
    the shock is likely to be catastrophic.

    Well the Lefty has been around for a good 4 years or so now. Lopes used
    it, Gracia uses it, Anno-caro used it. Havent heard of any failures. Seems
    like its holding up OK.

    --
    Matt

    Fear of a flat planet

  8. Sparky said:

    Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes
    ain't what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this
    "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out
    for a spin - didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail
    riding.

    Thanks,

    Sparky

    --
    In the end it is all ok. If it is not ok, then it is not the end.

    I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be
    able to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere.

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

  9. On 2004-05-23, Sparky penned:

    Quoted message said:

    Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes
    ain't what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this
    "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for
    a spin - didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    I went to a mtb clinic taught by a pro racer who's sponsored by
    Cannondale. She rides a Scalpel, which also has a lefty fork.

    I asked her what she thought about it, and she said she had no problems
    with it. I also asked her wrench/husband about it, and he said he likes
    it -- fewer parts to fail.

    Now, they're on the C'dale dole, so would they say anything even if they
    didn't like it? Probably not. Still, they seemed like pretty
    straightforward people.

    --
    monique

  10. On 2004-05-23, Zilla penned:

    Quoted message said:


    I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be able
    to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere.

    I'd never heard this before. Other than the lefty, which seems to be a
    unique cannondale thing, what does c'dale do that's different from other
    manufacturers? Do they purposely use different sizings and such?

    --
    monique

  11. The only thing I don't like about the lefty fork is that front wheel
    removal is a pain, you need to remove (or at least loosen) the disk
    brake caliper. If you take the wheel of a lot it could be an annoyance.

    Steve.

    Sparky said:

    Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes ain't
    what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this "Lefty
    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail riding.

    Thanks,

    Sparky

  12. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    I had a Jekyll (also w/Lefty) for a few months.

    One advantage of the Lefty is that you can fix a flat without removing the
    wheel.

    It also satisfied some sort of exhibitionistic tendency within me.

    Downsides to me included:

    - Needing a torque wrench to remove/replace the wheel,

    - Difficulty mounting a standard speedo (can't recall exactly what the problem
    was, but it was a hassle)

    - Something about having to remove the brake caliper before removing the wheel
    (since fixed, I think...).

    - An intimidating maintainence regimen - although the manual was so difficult to
    comprehend (mixing different fork types and more lawyer-speak than usual) that I
    can't really say what the regimen was...

    - The steering tube was cut at the factory. i.e. they didn't leave the user
    any room at all to move the stem up or down.

    Finally, something to be on the lookout for with C-Dale in general is
    proprietary parts. From reading other posts, it sounds like maybe they're
    getting the message; but the 1.5" stem drove me nuts and the 4-hole disc mounts
    seemed gratituitous. Neither one is probably proprietary in the strictest sense
    of the word - but with the stem, availability was limited to the point where I
    couldn't find the size I wanted.

    --
    PeteCresswell

  13. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Other than the lefty, which seems to be a
    unique cannondale thing, what does c'dale do that's different from other
    manufacturers? Do they purposely use different sizings and such?

    1.5" stems, 4-bolt brake discs on a Jekyll I owned couple years ago.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  14. Sparky said:

    Hey there.

    Out looking to buy my first mountain bike.

    Been road cycling with the same bike for about 20 years - and bikes
    ain't what they used to be. :-)

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this
    "Lefty Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out
    for a spin - didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    Also - any other comments on this bike (again - good or bad) are
    appreciated.

    I'll be using the bike for some city commuting as well as some trail
    riding.

    This last sentence has me wondering -- why a 100-mm fork for the type of
    riding you're anticipating?

    I would think you could find a terrific hardtail (or even fully rigid) for a
    lot less money, that would also suit your intended purposes better.

    Bill "not for a first mtb IMO" S.

  15. Monique Y. Mudama said:

    On 2004-05-23, Zilla penned:

    Quoted message said:


    I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be
    able to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere.

    I'd never heard this before. Other than the lefty, which seems to be
    a unique cannondale thing, what does c'dale do that's different from
    other manufacturers? Do they purposely use different sizings and
    such?

    --
    monique

    That would be enough for me. Who else makes Lefty
    forks? Pete C pointed other parts....

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

  16. Zilla said:
    Monique Y. Mudama said:

    On 2004-05-23, Zilla penned:

    Quoted message said:


    I never like proprietary nature of the C'dales. I just like to be
    able to buy stock parts for a bike anywhere.

    I'd never heard this before. Other than the lefty, which seems to be
    a unique cannondale thing, what does c'dale do that's different from
    other manufacturers? Do they purposely use different sizings and
    such?

    --
    monique

    That would be enough for me. Who else makes Lefty
    forks? Pete C pointed other parts....

    the headshok is another unique thing they do.

  17. Quoted message said:

    1.5" stems

    That was just ahead of it's time, as other fork / frame manu are going
    that way now

    --
    ===========================================================
    http://www.mtb-bikes.com

    Bunnies aren't just cute like everybody supposes
    They got them hoppy legs and twitchey little noses
    And what's with all the carrots
    What do they need such good eyesight for anyway
    Bunnies,bunnies
    It must be bunnies

  18. "Sparky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:rrYrc.567642

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this


    "Lefty

    Quoted message said:

    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    My understanding is that this shock is more desgned for DH (with mullets and
    bandanas)

    Lots of travel - use FS only. On a HT the rebound might wanna pitch ya

  19. I don't how much the bike cost I'll still smoke them on
    any of my bikes.

    I MTB 2004

  20. "Ozman Trad" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Sparky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:rrYrc.567642

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway - looking at picking up a Cannondale F800 - but it's got this


    "Lefty

    Quoted message said:

    Jake" front fork system. Looks odd - but when I took it out for a spin -
    didn't notice the design difference.

    What do you people think about this fork idea - good? bad?

    My understanding is that this shock is more desgned for DH (with mullets


    and

    Quoted message said:

    bandanas)

    Lots of travel - use FS only. On a HT the rebound might wanna pitch ya


    My Lefty has a rebound adjustment, I don't see how the rear suspension would
    make any difference.

    I've watched most of this discussion, I've had bikes with the Lefty,
    Headshok, Rockshok, and others, I think the Lefty is by far the best fork,
    it's stiffer than most, mine has been trouble free, it's quite and smooth.
    As someone mentioned earlier, it's biggest drawback is with removing the
    wheel for transporting, a real pain to haul around.

    As far as Cannondale's having priority components, aren't all shocks
    priority? I don't know of many parts that would interchangeable between any
    shocks, even same brand ones.

    Odd, "maybe regarding looks",
    Good idea, in my opinion definitely "yes"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.