Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Octalink confusion

Started by scituatejohn · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,335 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 February 2004
Last activity
5 February 2004
Original author
scituatejohn
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,335
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Shimano has a bottom bracket called ES51 and another one called ES30. They are Octalink V2 bottom brackets. They come in sizes 113, 118, 121, and 126mm. I read elsewhere on the Internet, that these bottom brackets are only for use with FC-M572 and FC-445 cranks. Besides the two additional spindle lengths, what differentiates these bottom brackets from the other Octalink V2 bottom brackets and makes them incompatible to other Octalink V2 cranks? It seems odd that Shimano would want to create this kind of confusion. They already had created enough confusion with the two different kinds of Octalink. Now they may have two different kinds of Octalink V2 to add to the confusion. I also read (here I think) that there are differences between some of the square taper bottom brackets too. Perhaps the path of least bottom bracket confusion would be to use cranks that take ISIS bottom brackets, or are they messed up too?

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by scituatejohn
    Shimano has a bottom bracket called ES51 and another one called ES30. They are Octalink V2 bottom brackets. They come in sizes 113, 118, 121, and 126mm. I read elsewhere on the Internet, that these bottom brackets are only for use with FC-M572 and FC-445 cranks. Besides the two additional spindle lengths, what differentiates these bottom brackets from the other Octalink V2 bottom brackets and makes them incompatible to other Octalink V2 cranks? It seems odd that Shimano would want to create this kind of confusion. They already had created enough confusion with the two different kinds of Octalink. Now they may have two different kinds of Octalink V2 to add to the confusion. I also read (here I think) that there are differences between some of the square taper bottom brackets too. Perhaps the path of least bottom bracket confusion would be to use cranks that take ISIS bottom brackets, or are they messed up too?

    Isis is not prefect either. There are iso(campy) and JIS(most oriental) square tapers. There are specific octalinkspindle lengths for specific cranks,as well as specific octalink splines for different cranks.
    Shimano tells you what goes with what.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.