General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Obese Americans

Started by Nancy Young · · Last activity · 47 posts · 1,390 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 April 2004
Last activity
17 April 2004
Original author
Nancy Young
Posts
47
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,390
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–47 of 47
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. John Gaughan said:
    Ranee Mueller said:

    A pound or a kg of anything weighs the same as a pound or
    kg of another thing.

    Incorrect. Kilograms are measures of mass, not weight.
    Pounds are measures of weight, not pounds. Here on Earth
    we define them to be roughly the same, but even on
    Earth, depending on the circumstances, they are not
    always the same.

    Gentlemen of the jury, Chicolini here may look like an
    idiot, and sound like an idiot, but don't let that fool
    you: He really is an idiot. Groucho Marx

    First thing you need to learn is that "weight" is an
    ambiguous word, one with several different meanings. So lets
    talk about the units of mass and the units of force; weight
    can be either mass or some particular kinds of force.

    Here's the official guide of the U.S. national standards
    laborabory, NIST Special Publication 811 (1995 ed.), _Guide
    for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)_ by
    Barry N. Taylor:

    Thus the SI unit of the quantity weight used in this
    sense is the kilogram (kg) and the verb "to weigh" means
    "to determine the mass of" or "to have a mass of".

    Examples: the child's weight is 23 kg the briefcase
    weighs 6 kg Net wt. 227 g

    Of course, the same section also discusses other definitions
    of weight,

    Thus the SI unit of the quantity weight defined in this
    way is the newton (N).

    Then it concludes with the excellent advice that "whenever
    the word 'weight' is used, it should be made clear which
    meaning is intended."

    The second thing you should know is that pounds have always
    been units of mass.

    Furthermore, both the avoirdupois pound and the kilogram
    have also spawned units of force of the same name, recent
    alterations which, although they had been used to some
    extent for over a century before then, were never well-
    defined units before the 20th century.

    The main difference between them is that the metric system
    is still fully supported and updated, and the keepers of our
    standards have been telling us for about 44 years to stop
    using kilograms force. OTOH, nobody is ever going to bother
    to tell us to stop using pounds force, without telling us to
    give up pounds all together.

    The pound force is such a recent invention that it is
    uniquely identified by that name. Of all the hundreds of
    different pounds used throughout history, only one of them
    has spun off a force unit of the same name.

    Look at the troy system of weights--that's what we call it,
    isn't it? This is still used for the weight of precious
    metals and some gems.

    There is one major way in which the troy units of weight
    differ from both the avoirdupois pounds and kilograms--there
    is no troy pound force or troy ounce force, and there never
    have been any troy pounds force or troy ounces force. The
    troy units of weight are always units of mass.

    Pounds had always been units of mass, but by the middle of
    the 20th century, they had gotten to be slightly different
    amounts of mass at various places throughout the world,
    before a common definition was arrived at. ngs.noaa.govFRdoc59
    5442.pdf gssp.wva.netrefine.pdf

    Announcement. Effective July 1, 1959, all calibrations in
    the U.S. customary system of by the National Bureau of
    Standards will continue to be based upon metric
    measurement standards and except for the U.S. Coast and
    Geodetic Survey as noted below, will be made in terms of
    the following exact equivalences and appropriate
    multiples and submultiples: 1 yard = 0.9144 1 pound
    (avoirdupois) = 0.453 592 37 kilogram Currently, the
    units defined by these same equivalences, which have been
    designated as the International Yard and the
    International Pound, respectively, will be used by the
    National Standards Laboratories of Australia, Canada, New
    Zealand, South Africa, and United Kingdom; thus there
    will be brought about international accord on the yard
    and pound by the English-speaking nations of the world,
    in precise measurements involving these basic units.

    --
    Gene Nygaard
    ourworld.compuserve.comGene Nygaard "It's
    not the things you don't know what gets you into trouble.

    "It's the things you do know that just ain't so."
    Will Rogers

  2. Tim Challenger 'timothy(dot)challenger(at)apk(dot)at said:
    Quoted message said:

    Their charts seem to be based solely on height and do not
    take frame types into consideration. According to the
    same charts, I'm 30lb overweight. I'm 5'10" and weight
    just over 200lb. I'm not fat, I don't have love handles
    nor do I have a gut. I haven't weight 170lb since I was
    16.

    You must be "big boned" then. ;-) I'm 5'10" and weigh
    about 178 lbs - I consider myself "cuddly".

    Nah, not big boned. I have muscle. 😉

    --
    Darryl L. Pierce <[email hidden]> Visit the Infobahn
    Offramp - <http://mypage.org/mcpierce> "What do you care
    what other people think, Mr. Feynman?"

  3. Peter Aitken said:

    "Ranee Mueller" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:raneemdonot-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>, Tony P.

    Quoted message said:

    What it neglects is that muscle weighs more than fat. So
    you could be 5'11 and weight say 220lbs with slight
    muscles, or 250lbs and all muscled up.

    That's not entirely true. Muscle is more dense than
    fat. They weigh the same thing. A pound is a pound is a
    pound and all. However a pound of fat is much larger in
    mass than a pound of muscle.

    According to you, rocks and feathers weight the same. Do
    you really believe this?


    Yes. One pound of rocks weighs exactly the same as one pound
    of feathers. How do things work in your world? ;-)

    --
    jmk in NC

  4. Gene Nygaard said:

    Gentlemen of the jury, Chicolini here may look like an
    idiot, and sound like an idiot, but don't let that fool
    you: He really is an idiot.

    I guess a year of college Physics taught me wrong, and some
    stranger on the Internet is correct. I am sorry for being an
    idiot, I will try harder next time.

    --
    John Gaughan johngaughan.netjohngaughan.net
    [email hidden]

  5. John Gaughan said:
    Gene Nygaard said:

    Gentlemen of the jury, Chicolini here may look like an
    idiot, and sound like an idiot, but don't let that fool
    you: He really is an idiot.

    I guess a year of college Physics taught me wrong, and some
    stranger on the Internet is correct. I am sorry for being
    an idiot, I will try harder next time.

    I've seen some physics textbooks and lots of web pages by
    high school and college teachers, many with Ph.D.'s, who
    get it wrong, so I'm not surprised that that is what led
    you astray.

    Unfortunately, this misinformation was often drummed into
    someone's head by a favorite teacher, and that's why I've
    learned that it often takes a big two-by-four to get
    someone's attention. It's gratifying when someone like you
    does pay attention and figures it out.

    Gene Nygaard
    ourworld.compuserve.comGene Nygaard

  6. This may or may not be a good litmus test. Go to Disneyland
    L.A. any Sunday. Count the obese people. If you see enough
    to disturb you, then there is an obesity problem.

    Daisy

  7. Daisy said:

    This may or may not be a good litmus test. Go to
    Disneyland L.A. any Sunday. Count the obese people. If you
    see enough to disturb you, then there is an obesity
    problem.

    And how is Disneyland the benchmark for population
    distribution?

    --
    Darryl L. Pierce <[email hidden]> Visit the Infobahn
    Offramp - <http://mypage.org/mcpierce> "What do you care
    what other people think, Mr. Feynman?"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.