nyny, oops, trick :)

Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.

160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

And that fraction is probably water - so you did a maintain. Congratulations for doing a great
maintain ;-D Elaine K
331.4/201.2/179

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

Fractions is nuttin hon! Sounds to me like you've done a fine job again.

Joyce

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

Ah, no worries girl, you are still doin' fab!

--

~Kristin O~
272/239.2/172

Here's our FAQ: didian.comasdwwOpen ↗ and welcome notice:
geocities.comindex.htmlOpen ↗

"Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though. Then mine will be saying 157 or
so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on mine.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.

160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want it???).
Maybe really back to regular Journaling will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do
I want it?

Lesanne said:

Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though. Then mine will be saying 157 or
so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on mine.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.

160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

LOL!! Sorry to laugh Lesanne, but for some goofy reason I am seeing humor in this. Has my *ish*
rubbed off on you? I thought I would be satisfied when I reached 150, then 140 ... then 135. I'm now
pushing the 130 mark (saw it a few times this week, but the average isn't quite there yet). It's now
almost like I just want to see that 12something pop onto the scale ... don't know why, just because.

I said something to that effect to a friend of mine today, she said I was nuts - don't lose any
more. It's beginning to be a comfort thing with me. The larger zone that I have, the safer I feel. I
still feel like I'm hanging on by the skin of my teeth. (maybe all the stress I've been under
lately???)

Joyce current weight: 131; total loss 97.8 lbs Lifetime: 4/4/03

Lesanne said:

Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though. Then mine will be saying 157 or
so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on mine.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.

160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X

Lesanne said:

too many treats.

Lesanne is up a fraction
(365)247/160/164

the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you. you may
want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in control
you don't have to ever say never, Lee
Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want
it???). Maybe really back to regular Journaling will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I
want it? Do I want it?

Lesanne said:

Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though. Then mine will be saying 157 or
so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on mine.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.

160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X

On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>too many treats.
>
>Lesanne is up a fraction
>(365)247/160/164
>

Good points. Thanks

Miss Violette said:

the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you. you may want it now or save
wanting it to work for later. Since you are in control you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred
<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want
it???). Maybe really back to regular Journaling will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I
want it? Do I want it?

Lesanne said:

Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though. Then mine will be saying 157
or so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on mine.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
>
> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
>
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >too many treats.
> >
> >Lesanne is up a fraction
> >(365)247/160/164
> >
>

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit. I am not overeating. I am
pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to cause more loss to happen. Maybe I need to just stay
where I am at, average 160. At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good points. Thanks

Miss Violette said:

the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you. you

may

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in

control

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want
it???). Maybe really back to regular Journaling will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I
want it? Do I want it?

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.

Then

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on
>mine.
>
>
>"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>"]news:[email hidden]...
>> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
>>
>> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
>>
>> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> >too many treats.
>> >
>> >Lesanne is up a fraction
>> >(365)247/160/164
>> >
>>
>

Is 160 your own personal goal or what WW says that you should weigh based on your height? Have you
also checked your weight at this site: halls.mdbody.htmOpen ↗ Maybe your goal of
160 is too high and that is what is causing you difficulities. The other possilibty is that 160 is
the right weight for you but your "mind" has not adjusted to the new you. Maybe you need to give
yourself some time to get used to this weight. Like you said, wait until January and then see how
you feel about being at 160.

"Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit. I am not overeating. I am
pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to cause more loss to happen. Maybe I need to just stay
where I am at, average

160.

Quoted message said:

At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good points. Thanks

Miss Violette said:

the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you. you

may

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in

control

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want
> it???). Maybe really back to regular

Journaling

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do I want it?
>
>
>
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.

Then

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be

in -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >between 155 and 159 on mine.
> >
> >
> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
> >>
> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
> >>
> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >too many treats.
> >> >
> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
> >> >(365)247/160/164
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

I guess I think I should con-solid-ate being solidly under goal. I think part of what is driving
this nonsense, altho, seriously, is being able to wear whatever and not have to worry about what it
might weigh and do to my goal weight. The difference can be affected by just wearing shoes or heavy
jeans. Nuts, huh? (G)

Lesanne said:

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit. I am not overeating. I am
pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to cause more loss to happen. Maybe I need to just stay
where I am at, average 160. At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good points. Thanks

Miss Violette said:

the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you. you

may

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in

control

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate, Tanita -
> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so how much do I really want
> it???). Maybe really back to regular Journaling will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I
> want it? Do I want it?
>
>
>
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.

Then

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be in - between 155 and 159 on
> >mine.
> >
> >
> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
> >>
> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
> >>
> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >too many treats.
> >> >
> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
> >> >(365)247/160/164
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

My WW goal was/is 164. My personal one was going to be 155. But it may just be 160.

"Laura" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kpVrb.45323$Ec1.3189143@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

Quoted message said:

Is 160 your own personal goal or what WW says that you should weigh based

on

Quoted message said:

your height? Have you also checked your weight at this site: halls.mdidealOpen ↗
weight/body.htm? Maybe your goal of 160 is too high and that is what is causing you difficulities.
The other possilibty

is

Quoted message said:

that 160 is the right weight for you but your "mind" has not adjusted to

the

Quoted message said:

new you. Maybe you need to give yourself some time to get used to this weight. Like you said, wait
until January and then see how you feel about being at 160.

"Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit.

I

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

am not overeating. I am pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to

cause

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

more loss to happen. Maybe I need to just stay where I am at, average

160.

Quoted message said:

At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good points. Thanks

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:10:03 GMT, "Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you.

you

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

may

Quoted message said:

>want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in

control

Quoted message said:

>you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>"]news:[email hidden]...
>> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate,

Tanita -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so

how

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> much do I really want it???). Maybe really back to regular

Journaling

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do I want it?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.

Then

Quoted message said:

>> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be

in -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >between 155 and 159 on mine.
>> >
>> >
>> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> >"]news:[email hidden]...
>> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
>> >>
>> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne"

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >too many treats.
>> >> >
>> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
>> >> >(365)247/160/164
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

no, in your case not at all nuts. I think you are doing great. I think all this thinking I am doing
about this has to do with my situation here, and will settle down when I get used to being at goal.
I hope. Truly it shouldn't be that complicated. (I have long since accepted that I am a bit nuts)

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I guess I think I should con-solid-ate being solidly under goal. I think part of what is driving
this nonsense, altho, seriously, is being able to wear whatever and not have to worry about what
it might weigh and do to my goal weight. The difference can be affected by just wearing shoes or
heavy jeans. Nuts, huh? (G)

Lesanne said:

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit.

I

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

am not overeating. I am pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to cause more loss to happen.
Maybe I need to just stay where I am at, average

160.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good points. Thanks

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:10:03 GMT, "Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you.

you

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

may

Quoted message said:

>want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in

control

Quoted message said:

>you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>"]news:[email hidden]...
>> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate,

Tanita -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so

how

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> much do I really want it???). Maybe really back to regular

Journaling

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do I want it?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.

Then

Quoted message said:

>> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be

in -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >between 155 and 159 on mine.
>> >
>> >
>> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> >"]news:[email hidden]...
>> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
>> >>
>> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne"

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >too many treats.
>> >> >
>> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
>> >> >(365)247/160/164
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

We are all a bit nuts - so join the crowd. And I have to guess that after years of being "out of
condition" that it takes a long time to be mentally comfortable at normal weight. And to be
uncomfortable at every shift upward even if slight. Body image is definitely part of it - I
still am amused and sometimes shocked that I have no stomach. It has been 5 months or more and
it still is NEW.

Fred

Lesanne said:

no, in your case not at all nuts. I think you are doing great. I think all this thinking I am doing
about this has to do with my situation here, and will settle down when I get used to being at goal.
I hope. Truly it shouldn't be that complicated. (I have long since accepted that I am a bit nuts)

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I guess I think I should con-solid-ate being solidly under goal. I think part of what is driving
this nonsense, altho, seriously, is being able to wear whatever and not have to worry about what
it might weigh and do to my goal weight. The difference can be affected by just wearing shoes or
heavy jeans. Nuts, huh? (G)

Lesanne said:

I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes fit.

I

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

am not overeating. I am pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to cause more loss to happen.
Maybe I need to just stay where I am at, average

160.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Good points. Thanks
>
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:10:03 GMT, "Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you.

you

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

may
> >want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in
control
> >you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate,

Tanita -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so

how

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> much do I really want it???). Maybe really back to regular

Journaling

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do I want it?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159 though.
Then
> >> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to be

in -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >between 155 and 159 on mine.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
> >> >>
> >> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne"

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >too many treats.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
> >> >> >(365)247/160/164
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Great NSV Fred. I would love to not have a stomach, but that'll never happen. Even when I weighed
130 lbs (20+ years ago), I still had a little one, can never remember myself without one. I would
probably have made a good belly dancer!
--
Brenda
209/172/150 NYNY goal 160

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

We are all a bit nuts - so join the crowd. And I have to guess that after years of being "out of
condition" that it takes a long time to be mentally comfortable at normal weight. And to be
uncomfortable at every shift upward even if slight. Body image is definitely part of it - I
still am amused and sometimes shocked that I have no stomach. It has been 5 months or more and
it still is NEW.

Fred

Lesanne said:

no, in your case not at all nuts. I think you are doing great. I think all this thinking I am
doing about this has to do with my situation here, and will settle down when I get used to being
at goal. I hope. Truly it shouldn't be that complicated. (I have long since accepted that I am a

bit

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

nuts)

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I guess I think I should con-solid-ate being solidly under goal. I think part of what is
driving this nonsense, altho, seriously, is being able to wear whatever and not have to worry
about what it might weigh and do to my goal weight. The difference can be affected by just
wearing shoes or heavy jeans. Nuts, huh? (G)

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:09:22 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>I was thinking more on this. I am solidly under goal. My clothes

fit.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I

Quoted message said:

>am not overeating. I am pretty uncomfortable undereating enough to

cause

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>more loss to happen. Maybe I need to just stay where I am at, average

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

160.

Quoted message said:

>At least until Jan, when everyone is on a diet anyway.....
>
>"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>"]news:[email hidden]...
>> Good points. Thanks
>>
>> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:10:03 GMT, "Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> >the point is that it is a choice that belongs to you and only you.

you

Quoted message said:

>may
>> >want it now or save wanting it to work for later. Since you are in
>control
>> >you don't have to ever say never, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> >"]news:[email hidden]...
>> >> That's what I would like, too - on my nice, pretty accurate,

Tanita -

Quoted message said:

>> >> 155. We shall see since I really am not pushing the envelope (so

how

Quoted message said:

>> >> much do I really want it???). Maybe really back to regular

Journaling

Quoted message said:

>> >> will be the only way. Do I want it? Do I want it? Do I want

it?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 00:18:17 GMT, "Lesanne"

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Yeah, I feel fairly safe at an "official" 160. I want 159

though.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>Then
>> >> >mine will be saying 157 or so, which is in the range I want to

be

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

in -

Quoted message said:

>> >> >between 155 and 159 on mine.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> >> >"]news:[email hidden]...
>> >> >> Fractions only count in horseshoes or something like that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 160 looks like pretty healthy Maintenance. Next week 15X
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:41:26 GMT, "Lesanne"

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >too many treats.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Lesanne is up a fraction
>> >> >> >(365)247/160/164
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

I am picturing the seven veils right now (G)

Went hiking today and it went pretty well - much better than when the stomach blocked the view of
the trail! (G) But seriously, I occasionally glance down and am still fascinated, amazed, pleased by
the low profile down there (no one go any further with this image!!!!)

Brenda Hammond said:

Great NSV Fred. I would love to not have a stomach, but that'll never happen. Even when I weighed
130 lbs (20+ years ago), I still had a little one, can never remember myself without one. I would
probably have made a good belly dancer!

Awwww shucks! You didn't tell Lesanne and I that you were weighing in nekid again. <gdr>

Joyce

Fred said:

I am picturing the seven veils right now (G)

Went hiking today and it went pretty well - much better than when the stomach blocked the view of
the trail! (G) But seriously, I occasionally glance down and am still fascinated, amazed, pleased
by the low profile down there (no one go any further with this image!!!!)

Brenda Hammond said:

Great NSV Fred. I would love to not have a stomach, but that'll never happen. Even when I weighed
130 lbs (20+ years ago), I still had a little one, can never remember myself without one. I would
probably have made a good belly dancer!

I think my leader would have me arrested!

Joyce said:

Awwww shucks! You didn't tell Lesanne and I that you were weighing in nekid again. <gdr>

Joyce

Fred said:

I am picturing the seven veils right now (G)

Went hiking today and it went pretty well - much better than when the stomach blocked the view of
the trail! (G) But seriously, I occasionally glance down and am still fascinated, amazed, pleased
by the low profile down there (no one go any further with this image!!!!)

Brenda Hammond said:

Great NSV Fred. I would love to not have a stomach, but that'll never happen. Even when I weighed
130 lbs (20+ years ago), I still had a little one, can never remember myself without one. I would
probably have made a good belly dancer!