elyob said:"Ambrose Nankivell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I think you mean:
In news:[email hidden],
Silverfox <[email hidden]> typed:
elyob said:> I was hoping they'd get knocked off and killed. Deserve it cycling
> like that. [censored].
Oh! why don't you live a little!
I'm a bit torn. It looked pretty darn exhilarating, but on the other hand,
they did upset quite a few people and I'm surprised they didn't have any
collisions, possibly bad ones.
Nah, what I meant was .. "have you seen 'New World Disorder' when they at
least do decent tricks without endangering peds, but just endanger
themselves".
That was a bunch of middle aged blokes who ... well .. I felt that was far
too dangerous to call fun. I also walk, and don't want to be crippled by an
idiot on a pavement/crossing.
Indeed. Note I used the word exhilarating, not fun. I don't think it
was OK behaviour, but it was good to watch, if you imagine it's all
filmed by professional stuntmen.
Quoted message said:If you feel that I don't have a life, then *plonk* me.
I definitely didn't say that. Indeed one of the main reasons I replied
was to make a subtle hint to SilverFox (who appears to represent the
company of that name) about how to properly reply on newsgroups,
attributing quotes, etc.
Quoted message said:I'd hate to kill a ped because I cycle through red lights without a
care. I spend a long time defending cycling as a whole. That ruins
everything I believe in.
It does, and I'm sure I'd have had a much graver reaction if it'd been
somewhere other than New York, particularly if it'd been this
country. I guess I see respectable cycling as a lost cause there,
whereas it isn't here.
Quoted message said:That's my say, and I will still 'tut' people for cycling on pavements and
the rest ..
So you should.
Quoted message said:http://www.lesberries.co.uk/ccraft/ccraft.htm
A useful link.
Sorry if I offended,
A