Cycling Training · Public discussion

(Not so) long rides

Started by meandmybike · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,676 views

← Back to Cycling Training

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original post(Not so) long ridesmeandmybike · 9 Mar 2007 02 / This pagePosts 1–7Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #7meandmybike · 10 Mar 2007

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
9 March 2007
Last activity
10 March 2007
Original author
meandmybike
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,676
Views / 30 days
0
Topics
Group ridingFTPNutritionPower meters

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    meandmybike
    Archived post
    #1

    There's a feature in this week's Cycling Weekly about how long your longest ride needs to be. Roger Hammond says he prefers to do 5 - 5.5 hours at a higher pace than 7+ hour rides like most pros.

    With this in mind and having a chaotic schedule (young family and business to run) I'm curious what people think of this method. I'm doing a very hilly century in June but will struggle to fit more than a couple of 6-7 hour rides in. By doing 4 -4.5 hour rides at a higher pace (using Powertap as pacing tool) will I still be prepared for such a long ride?

    The rest of my rides are SST and L4 during the week. I'm making good progress with raising FTP (330 watts/70.5 kg up from 300 watts/76kg in December) but am concerned about 'lasting the distance'.

    All advice appreciated.

    Report
  2. NomadVW
    Archived post
    #2

    Lemond is quoted somewhere as saying you never need to do more than 4 1/2 hr rides.

    I'm not sure what you define as "very hilly" so, that makes it hard to say how long you'll be on the bike for. Usually the only time I'm on the bike for longer than 5 hrs is because I chose to go a certain route that just happens to be that distance for fun and at endurance pace.

    For instance, there's a route I really like because of a bombing descent and hellacious climb that is 188 km total. Takes me about 8 hours to do the whole thing at and endurance pace with a partner. I work really hard on the major climb for the sake of the workout there, but the rest of it is pretty much endurance pace for the fun of the distance.

    End of this month I'll do a group ride century because, well... it's a group ride. It'll probably take around 6 hrs total, I'd guess.

    Also, if you can manage your on the bike nutrition past 3-4 hrs, you should be able to continue to manage it beyond there.

    Report
  3. meandmybike
    Archived post
    #3
    NomadVW said:

    Lemond is quoted somewhere as saying you never need to do more than 4 1/2 hr rides.

    I'm not sure what you define as "very hilly" so, that makes it hard to say how long you'll be on the bike for.

    c. 10,000ft of climbing. I reckon 6.5 hours on the bike.

    Report
  4. 1963
    Archived post
    #4

    for that i say get a life

    Report
  5. Uhl
    Archived post
    #5
    meandmybike said:

    I'm making good progress with raising FTP (330 watts/70.5 kg up from 300 watts/76kg in December) but am concerned about 'lasting the distance'.

    All advice appreciated.

    At 4.68 W/kg, you should be racing, not just doing centuries (other than for training and fun).

    Hey, you said "All advice appreciated." 😄

    Report
  6. JTE83
    Archived post
    #6

    Your long rides and power output put me to shame! My long distance rides are 36 to 56 miles long, and my legs get wasted and I don't ride the next day. Mostly 3:15 hr rides. Never did a century. I'm happy with the distance I do because I can lose up to 2.2 lbs from such rides, so I don't have to bike any farther. I bike around 80 to 87% MHR only.

    Report
  7. meandmybike
    Archived post
    #7
    Uhl said:

    At 4.68 W/kg, you should be racing, not just doing centuries (other than for training and fun).

    Hey, you said "All advice appreciated." 😄

    Thanks. Actually I would be racing if I could commit to the time but I'm taking the view that my kids will only be this young once, whilst I can (hopefully) get back into racing in a year or two when they'll be old enough to come and chear the old man on. Centuries and the odd local mountain bike challenge are a good way to keep/develop my fitness without missing out on too much family time.

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionCycling Training Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.