"Pennyaline" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:jay said:elaine said:I went out to lunch today with a friend. Waitress, "what will you have
to drink" - Us, "water's fine, thanks." So 2 bottled waters arrived
along with glasses. I thought that was a bit weird and checked the
menu. They were charging $2 per bottle. I buy the same brand of
water - 36 bottles for about $3.50 or so on sale. We'd opened one
bottle but needless to say, didn't open the other bottle.
Who's going to pay $2 for a no-name kind of water, when (I think) most
restaurants have it; ----well free! Quite the rip off.
Elaine
Yep. You are lucky they didn't slip you a fufu bottle and charge you
$6.50 US each. It is just a way for them to get your check up, up, up.
Surely you could ask for tap and they would not charge, well maybe. <g>
Were there water glasses on the table before your order was taken, and had
they been filled?
Interesting thought-provoking idea. I suppose if there aren't already on
the table glasses for water or filled glasses, that could be a sign that the
restaurant was going to offer you the bottled water for purchase. However,
looking thru the restaurants' eyes toward profits, if one really wants
bottled water; then, whether the glasses are filled or not wouldn't make any
difference to the person who really wants bottled water.
We usually only want water (cheap seniors, I think some might say) or wine.
DH will drink 4 glasses of water without a thought. I will drink 1/2 cup.
He drinks with ice; I don't drink with ice. If I heat hot food, I'll have a
beer. He wouldn't pay for bottled water because he's not fussy. But lately
when they have asked me if I want water, I'll say, "Yes, but not bottled
water."
I always am glad to have a choice of wine if not for any other reason than
hopefully I'll get better service, thinking that the server might think
since we're oldsters and order plain water that we might stiff them -- as
seems to be opinion of a great many people.
Dee Dee