Australia and New Zealand ยท Public discussion

not all hoons are bad...

Started by flyingdutch ยท ยท Last activity ยท 6 posts ยท 1,004 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
24 March 2006
Last activity
25 March 2006
Original author
flyingdutch
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,004
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1โ€“6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. peterbrock.com.auupcomingevents.html

    hopefully he has come out with a bicycle-friendly version of those crystals ๐Ÿ™„

  2. flyingdutch said:

    peterbrock.com.auupcomingevents.html

    hopefully he has come out with a bicycle-friendly version of those crystals ๐Ÿ™„

    I saw an article in the HUN last week with Brock and some other V8 guy coming out in favor of graded licences; i.e. don't let anyone under 25 drive powerful cars. Can't find it online but I haven't looked that hard.

  3. flyingdutch said:


    http://peterbrock.com.au/home/upcomingevents.html

    hopefully he has come out with a bicycle-friendly version of those
    crystals ๐Ÿ™„

    Nope, sorry, I don't see this as a bicycle-friendly hoon. It's simply self
    interest - build a bike track (where ther's a perfectly good road) and 'get
    those bloody cyclists off the road'.

    Pretty much like BV not doing much to help on-road cyclists by continually
    lobbying for more bike paths. Now if Brocky and BV would get together and
    campaign for serious bike-friendly driver education, that would make a
    difference.

    --
    Cheers
    Peter

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*)

  4. Peter Signorini said:

    Pretty much like BV not doing much to help on-road cyclists by continually lobbying for more bike paths

    ahem! you seemed to have conveniently forgotten all the onroad lanes they campaign for as well. couldn't agree more about the bike-friendly driver Ed tho.

    Our 'BR' ride comes back along the St.A>>Hurstbridge>>YarraGlen Rd and I doubt i would ever ride the intended path (nor would the many other roadies who are out that way...), but many would. Choices, and all that. more people riding more often, etc etc

    FWIW my brother (currently team mech with DickJohnsonRacingTeam) worked with he MOBIL team back when brocky was winning, and part of Brocky's team contract was all the team had to accept and use the branded mtb given to all of em.
    Bro passed it on after a bit and it was my first bike with rapidfire thingies...

  5. flyingdutch said:


    Peter Signorini said:

    Pretty much like BV not doing much to help on-road cyclists by
    continually lobbying for more bike paths

    ahem! you seemed to have conveniently forgotten all the onroad lanes
    they campaign for as well.

    Bike lanes? Hehehehe!

    Out my way (City of Whitehorse) it's a dogs breakfast. Bike lanes that start
    and stop, and not legal lanes as they have no signs; obstructions built into
    the 'bike lanes' because they are trying to control the motor vehicle
    traffic; lanes on quiet secondary roads that go nowhere; but none on most
    main roads, which is where commuting cyclists ride. The ratio of roads to
    bike lanes would be a factor of at least 100:1. BV has a long way to go
    still.

    I do agree, bike lanes may be a cycling success story from BV in the inner
    suburbs, but out here they tend to be the bit of road that nobody else uses,
    free to reclaim for traffic as traffic engineers see fit.

    --
    Cheers
    Peter

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*)

  6. Peter Signorini said:


    Bike lanes? Hehehehe!

    Out my way (City of Whitehorse) it's a dogs breakfast. Bike lanes that start
    and stop, and not legal lanes as they have no signs; obstructions built into
    the 'bike lanes' because they are trying to control the motor vehicle
    traffic; lanes on quiet secondary roads that go nowhere; but none on most
    main roads, which is where commuting cyclists ride. The ratio of roads to
    bike lanes would be a factor of at least 100:1. BV has a long way to go
    still.

    I do agree, bike lanes may be a cycling success story from BV in the inner
    suburbs, but out here they tend to be the bit of road that nobody else uses,
    free to reclaim for traffic as traffic engineers see fit.

    --
    Cheers
    Peter

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*)

    ah, whitehorse. or shold that be 'white elephant' ?!?!

    with a 'Bike advisory committee' which basically hears what the locals want but doesnt listen. rather patronising ๐Ÿ™

    BTW Vicroads/council build them.
    funny how 'everyone' assumes it should be BV fixing it ๐Ÿ™„
    They can ask/lobby/cajole/nag/beg but they cant build anything.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.