General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Noob looking for good motion control shoes

Started by mckeowbc · · Last activity · 15 posts · 270 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 December 2004
Last activity
12 December 2004
Original author
mckeowbc
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
270
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm pretty new to running but I'm to the point where I really want to
    invest in a good pair of running shoes. I'm a bit on the heavy side,
    5'10" 200 lbs. Also I have low arches and I pronate a bit. I went to a
    decent running store in my area and they had me try on a pair of New
    Balance 856's. I liked the way they felt but I figured I should check
    on what other people thought about them. So when I got home I started
    doing some reading. Are these a good choice? Or should I be looking
    hard at a pair of Adidas Supernova Control's, or maybe a pair of
    Brook's Addiction's. I know that ultimately I'm going to just have to
    try some shoes on, but from what I've heard about the 856's people
    liked them when they put them on at the store but then had problems
    with them. I'd really like to get a pair of durable shoes that I can
    log a lot of miles on without injury or pain and if possible I'd like
    to stay under $100.

  2. mckeowbc said:


    I'm pretty new to running but I'm to the point where I really want to
    invest in a good pair of running shoes. I'm a bit on the heavy side,
    5'10" 200 lbs. Also I have low arches and I pronate a bit. I went to a
    decent running store in my area and they had me try on a pair of New
    Balance 856's.

    It depends on how much pronation control you need. I have
    collapsing arches, and need a lot. I wear the NB 1122s.
    I also use an orthotic to help support the arches.

    Quoted message said:

    I liked the way they felt but I figured I should check
    on what other people thought about them. So when I got home I started
    doing some reading. Are these a good choice? Or should I be looking
    hard at a pair of Adidas Supernova Control's, or maybe a pair of
    Brook's Addiction's.

    I don't think the brand makes too much difference.
    brands are a matter of personal preference. I also
    have/wear Asics motion shoes. I prefer the NB for
    2 reasons: The NB are a more cushioned shoe (i.e.,
    some motion shoes are like strapping 2x4s to your
    feet) and my experience with NB as a company is
    very positive. If you go to a running store and
    they misfit you in the wrong shoe and you have
    problems or injuries, NB will exchange it for a
    correct pair for free. So that can help a bit if
    you're not quite sure you have the right shoe after
    a month or so.

    Quoted message said:

    I know that ultimately I'm going to just have to
    try some shoes on, but from what I've heard about the 856's people
    liked them when they put them on at the store but then had problems
    with them. I'd really like to get a pair of durable shoes that I can
    log a lot of miles on without injury or pain and if possible I'd like
    to stay under $100.

    If you need motion shoes my advice is to get the
    shoes you need, not the shoes you can afford. Or
    find the shoes you need and then look for bargins.

    Running shoes, BTW, are only as "durable" as the
    running you do in them. 300-500 miles is usually
    when they need replacing. Depends on how often and
    much you run. I tend to waer mine a little longer
    but the orthotics help.

  3. Tom Phillips said:

    If you need motion shoes my advice is to get the
    shoes you need, not the shoes you can afford. Or
    find the shoes you need and then look for bargins.

    Oops, I was thinking of the 857NB. 856 is a
    stability shoe. Still with low arches you may
    need/want greater arch support.

    Sometimes the only way is trial and error..

  4. Quoted message said:

    I'm a bit on the heavy side,
    5'10" 200 lbs

    Another inch and a half and you'd be a god, like me.

    Quoted message said:

    Also I have low arches and I pronate a bit. I went to a
    decent running store in my area and they had me try on a pair of New
    Balance 856's. I liked the way they felt but I figured I should check
    on what other people thought about them. So when I got home I started
    doing some reading. Are these a good choice? Or should I be looking
    hard at a pair of Adidas Supernova Control's, or maybe a pair of
    Brook's Addiction's. I know that ultimately I'm going to just have to
    try some shoes on, but from what I've heard about the 856's people
    liked them when they put them on at the store but then had problems
    with them. I'd really like to get a pair of durable shoes that I can
    log a lot of miles on without injury or pain and if possible I'd like
    to stay under $100.

    Try the Asics 1090, and 2090 series first, much better shoe at controling these
    problems.
    And don't ask US what shoes you need, only you can tell that by trying them on,
    and trotting around in them a bit.

  5. Quoted message said:

    I don't think the brand makes too much difference.

    It sure does in price! A good example is nike, where you pay a third more for
    the shoe compared to other brands, just for advertising the name. Brands can
    make a big difference. A shoe comparable to a $90 Asics 2090 in the nike line,
    would cost you $130 to $140

  6. "FabulustRunner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't think the brand makes too much difference.

    It sure does in price! A good example is nike, where you pay a third more
    for
    the shoe compared to other brands, just for advertising the name. Brands
    can
    make a big difference. A shoe comparable to a $90 Asics 2090 in the nike
    line,
    would cost you $130 to $140

    Not true. The comparable Nike shoes to the Asics 2090 (or new 2100) are the
    Nike Structure Triax at $90 and the Nike Span at $85. If you compare all the
    Nike Bowerman shoes to any other brand's line you'll see that their prices
    are almost identical.

    Jim Johnson

  7. You may also want to try Brooks Adrenaline - a good stability choice. I tried
    various other brands including Nike & New Balance before settling on these some
    years ago.

    Bert

  8. "Bert Duplessis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You may also want to try Brooks Adrenaline - a good stability choice. I
    tried
    various other brands including Nike & New Balance before settling on these
    some
    years ago.

    Good suggestion. This shoe has put a serious hurtin' on the comparable Nike,
    NB and Asics models in shops all over the country.

    Jim Johnson

  9. Quoted message said:

    Not true. The comparable Nike shoes to the Asics 2090 (or new 2100) are the
    Nike Structure Triax at $90 and the Nike Span at $85. If you compare all the
    Nike Bowerman shoes to any other brand's line you'll see that their prices
    are almost identical.

    Jim Johnson

    You are DEAD wrong! Those shoes are NOWHERE NEAR the Asics 2090 in quality.
    Those pieces of [censored] wouldn't last half the time the Asics would.

  10. When I referred to durable I only meant that from what I heard the
    856's have some durability problems. A couple people on the runners
    world forums had complained that they wore out after "only" 250 miles.
    I was hoping to get more like 400 out of them, which seems like a
    reasonable number.

  11. I know, I realize that I'm the only one who can decide what feels right
    on my foot, but I figured as a relative newbie it couldn't hurt to get
    some general opinions to help me sort through my choices. Also from a
    couple of the posts I read about the NB 856's people liked how they
    felt at the store and on a short run, but after a few weeks started
    getting blisters, knee pain, or other problems. So I wanted to avoid
    this experience if possible, because I'm not experienced at buying
    running shoes it would be very easy for me to pick something that feels
    comfortable that doesn't actually hold up when I start running longer
    distances.

  12. Thanks, I'll put those on my list to check out.

  13. mckeowbc said:


    When I referred to durable I only meant that from what I heard the
    856's have some durability problems. A couple people on the runners
    world forums had complained that they wore out after "only" 250 miles.
    I was hoping to get more like 400 out of them, which seems like a
    reasonable number.

    I have no experience with this particular shoe, but I've
    never had NB shoes need replacing after only 250 miles.
    Roadrunnersports.com describes the 856 as being a high
    mileage shoe.

    What I'm suggesting is if you also have low/falling arches
    you may want to look at an orthotic (like generic Superfeet,
    just to see if it helps.) Given your weight combined with
    arch issues you may need the extra support. Don't be in a
    hurry. Go to stores with treadmills and experienced staff
    and try on lots of shoes. Make sure they're at least a half
    size larger and/or can accomodate inserts comfortably.

  14. Maybe the guy who made the post about them wearing out quickly just got
    a bad pair. He had said that he had a pair of 855's that he put 500
    miles on and then got the 856's and wore them out after only 250. But
    maybe that hasn't happened to everyone. I've thought about getting an
    orthotic. I wear arch supports in my tennis shoes, so I should
    probably get some decent orthotics for my running shoes.

  15. mckeowbc said:


    Maybe the guy who made the post about them wearing out quickly just got
    a bad pair. He had said that he had a pair of 855's that he put 500
    miles on and then got the 856's and wore them out after only 250. But
    maybe that hasn't happened to everyone. I've thought about getting an
    orthotic. I wear arch supports in my tennis shoes, so I should
    probably get some decent orthotics for my running shoes.

    Just try your arch supports in your running shoes. Or
    as I say try Superfeet (greens) for $30...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.