Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

No-bulge flat bars besides Titec?

Started by Snortley · · Last activity · 6 posts · 831 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2008
Last activity
10 June 2008
Original author
Snortley
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
831
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone know of a currently marketed flat bar with no
    center bulge and no rise besides this one, the Titec T1 118?:

    http://www.titec.com/dynamic_content/product/handlebars/pl_1.jpg
    http://www.ebikestop.com/titec_118_ti_bar_wberts_555mm-HB2300.php

    That's a shim in the picture, not a bulge, no wider than a
    stem clamp. This is a nice enough bar if you're into low-weight vs.
    structure brinksmanship, which I'm not, not being a racer. I would
    prefer something like this in alloy, or if in ti, a little beefier
    than this one, which is so thin at the ends that it comes with
    reinforcement plugs to keep it from collapsing if you add bar ends.
    Titec used to make another, stronger model, the PG, but no longer. Is
    there anything around along this line besides this weight-weenie
    version?

  2. "Snortley" <[email hidden]> a écrit:

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a currently marketed flat bar with no
    center bulge and no rise besides this one, the Titec T1 118?:

    Roox make something similar - 145g but with a plastic shim:

    http://www.roox.at/roox/Components_web_2006/product_page_handlebars_2006.htm

    James Thomson

  3. Snortley said:

    Does anyone know of a currently marketed flat bar with no
    center bulge and no rise besides this one, the Titec T1 118?:

    http://www.titec.com/dynamic_content/product/handlebars/pl_1.jpg
    http://www.ebikestop.com/titec_118_ti_bar_wberts_555mm-HB2300.php

    That's a shim in the picture, not a bulge, no wider than a
    stem clamp. This is a nice enough bar if you're into low-weight vs.
    structure brinksmanship, which I'm not, not being a racer. I would
    prefer something like this in alloy, or if in ti, a little beefier
    than this one, which is so thin at the ends that it comes with
    reinforcement plugs to keep it from collapsing if you add bar ends.
    Titec used to make another, stronger model, the PG, but no longer. Is
    there anything around along this line besides this weight-weenie
    version?

    you pretty much have to have a bulge of some kind - the stem clamp is of
    greater diameter than the control clamps.

    what is your objective? if you're worried about fatigue, a carbon bar
    is probably your best bet. and the downhill versions are real strong.

  4. "James Thomson" <[email hidden]> a écrit:

    Quoted message said:

    Roox make something similar - 145g but with a plastic shim:

    and a couple more in titanium from XACD and Skyde:

    http://www.xacd.com.cn/product.asp?rootcl=1&cls=6

    http://www.skydecomp.fr/pages/home.htm

    http://www.skydecomp.fr/pages/details/classico_ajo/detail01.htm

    The Skyde may well be sourced from XACD. 155g in plain gauge 3Al2.5V Ti

    James Thosmon

  5. jim beam said:

    you pretty much have to have a bulge of some kind - the stem clamp is of
    greater diameter than the control clamps.

    what is your objective? if you're worried about fatigue, a carbon bar
    is probably your best bet. and the downhill versions are real strong.

    Thanks for all the leads; I'll have to run these down and see
    who will ship to the U.S. if nothing's available here.

    My objective? It's been my experience that there's no good
    reason for a bar to be any wider than me, so I cut flat bars down to
    about 18 inches. That's just a bit less than most original sizes, but
    it's helped to get through some narrow places. Just last weekend as I
    made my way through a single-track with poison ivy on both sides, I
    was thankful for the bit of extra clearance.

    Anyway, while this avoids some scrapes, it does make it hard
    to mount things, since the slope by the bulge doesn't get along with
    most clamps on bells, lights, and the like. If they work at all, they
    slide over to the narrow diameter. I would just like to be able to
    locate things on the bar where they work best, rather than where they
    insist on going.

    I wonder how necessary the bulge really is. Good bars have an
    increasing wall thickness toward the center to deal with greater
    stress, anyway, and I would guess the greater circumference there adds
    strength, but couldn't yet more wall thickness do enough if an even
    outside diameter is desired? Well, I'll be giving one of these bars a
    try, and hopefully won't end up crashing as a result.

  6. Snortley said:
    jim beam said:

    you pretty much have to have a bulge of some kind - the stem clamp is of
    greater diameter than the control clamps.

    what is your objective? if you're worried about fatigue, a carbon bar
    is probably your best bet. and the downhill versions are real strong.

    Thanks for all the leads; I'll have to run these down and see
    who will ship to the U.S. if nothing's available here.

    My objective? It's been my experience that there's no good
    reason for a bar to be any wider than me, so I cut flat bars down to
    about 18 inches. That's just a bit less than most original sizes, but
    it's helped to get through some narrow places. Just last weekend as I
    made my way through a single-track with poison ivy on both sides, I
    was thankful for the bit of extra clearance.

    Anyway, while this avoids some scrapes, it does make it hard
    to mount things, since the slope by the bulge doesn't get along with
    most clamps on bells, lights, and the like. If they work at all, they
    slide over to the narrow diameter. I would just like to be able to
    locate things on the bar where they work best, rather than where they
    insist on going.

    I wonder how necessary the bulge really is. Good bars have an
    increasing wall thickness toward the center to deal with greater
    stress, anyway, and I would guess the greater circumference there adds
    strength, but couldn't yet more wall thickness do enough if an even
    outside diameter is desired? Well, I'll be giving one of these bars a
    try, and hopefully won't end up crashing as a result.

    if you're cutting the bar, don't use carbon. most have internal
    reinforcement where the brake lever clamps go, based on standard
    placement. if you cut, the levers will not be on reinforced sections as
    intended.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.