General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Nike Free 5.0

Started by Red Dot · · Last activity · 10 posts · 968 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 July 2004
Last activity
18 July 2004
Original author
Red Dot
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
968
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. They supposedly simulate running barefoot.
    Any thoughts?

    http://www.nike.com/nikefree/

  2. Red Dot said:

    They supposedly simulate running barefoot.
    Any thoughts?

    http://www.nike.com/nikefree/

    Why spend $80 on shoes to "simulate running barefoot" ?

    Wouldn't actually running barefoot be a better simulation ?

    How are these different from flats anyway ?

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  3. "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Red Dot said:

    They supposedly simulate running barefoot.
    Any thoughts?

    http://www.nike.com/nikefree/

    Why spend $80 on shoes to "simulate running barefoot" ?


    To protect the feet from cuts and abrasions. Go out and run a few
    miles on a track barefoot or on the roads.

    Quoted message said:


    Wouldn't actually running barefoot be a better simulation ?

    How are these different from flats anyway ?

    Not sure, from what I can tell and the scuttlebutt from a friend (at
    Reebok actually), the shoes are a bit more substantial than flats and would
    be more durable.

    Quoted message said:


    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  4. "Sam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Red Dot said:

    They supposedly simulate running barefoot. Any thoughts?

    http://www.nike.com/nikefree/

    Why spend $80 on shoes to "simulate running barefoot" ?


    To protect the feet from cuts and abrasions. Go out and run a few
    miles on a track barefoot or on the roads.

    Valid point. I've tried it. It takes a long time to get used to barefoot,
    and after
    a few weeks not going barefoot (eg, after a foot injury), you're back to
    scratch.

    I went from half an hours twice a week for three weeks, to an hours twice
    a week for five or six weeks, then daily was not a problem. Broken glass
    and pointy sticks were a problem, as were VERY smooth paths that
    a small about of gravel had snuck on to. Running on gravel was fine...

    I've been able to walk barefoot to retain toughness of the soul and the
    right kind of integrity of the foot. [Teaches you not to use "heel strike"].

    Tom.

  5. Red Dot <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    They supposedly simulate running barefoot.
    Any thoughts?

    http://www.nikesux.com/nikefree/

    And for pricing info, go to "[email hidden]".
    Don't forget, the first $40 from your purchase price goes to the
    advertising budget.

  6. "Sam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Not sure, from what I can tell and the scuttlebutt from a friend

    [censored] lovers.

    Quoted message said:

    (at
    Reebok actually), the shoes are a bit more substantial than flats and would
    be more durable.

    Gee, flats with padding...how unique!

  7. Sam said:

    "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Red Dot said:

    They supposedly simulate running barefoot.

    Why spend $80 on shoes to "simulate running barefoot" ?


    To protect the feet from cuts and abrasions. Go out and run a few
    miles on a track barefoot or on the roads.

    It depends a bit on the facilities you have available, but you don't have to
    run barefoot on roads to get benefits. Two years ago at spring break time
    there was a kid previously from our area who was on the xc and track teams at
    Stanford, just doing a workout on our track. He did his wamup jog of 4 laps
    barefoot on the infield, which is the same thing that I do and I have high
    school runners do. We also do drills barefoot on grass.

    Now, I actually live at the beach and do morning runs barefoot on days I don't
    do a track workout. Obviously, there aren't too many beaches in Colorado
    Springs. But I think that just about everyone serious enough about running to
    warm up properly (including some ROM drills) can find a track infield or soccer
    field, or something of the kind that they can actually run barefoot on.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Wouldn't actually running barefoot be a better simulation ?

    How are these different from flats anyway ?

    Not sure, from what I can tell and the scuttlebutt from a friend (at
    Reebok actually), the shoes are a bit more substantial than flats and would
    be more durable.


    My understanding is that these are not running shoes, per se. These are WARMUP
    shoes with something like 50 flex points (where the typical running shoes have
    1 or 2) to emulate the feel of running barefoot. If you read the pr stuff that
    Nike has written about the Free, it talks about warmup sprints for football or
    drills for running. Nowhere do they talk about doing marathon training in
    these, and I would think that anyone who tries to replace regular running shoes
    with the Free is going to be diappointed.

    What they're trying to sell these shoes for, you can do without any shoes, for
    free.

    Lyndon
    "Speed Kills...It kills those that don't have it!" --US Olympic Track Coach
    Brooks Johnson

  8. "Lyndon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sam said:

    "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-07-16, Red Dot <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > They supposedly simulate running barefoot.

    Why spend $80 on shoes to "simulate running barefoot" ?


    To protect the feet from cuts and abrasions. Go out and run a few
    miles on a track barefoot or on the roads.

    It depends a bit on the facilities you have available, but you don't have


    to

    Quoted message said:

    run barefoot on roads to get benefits. Two years ago at spring break time
    there was a kid previously from our area who was on the xc and track teams


    at

    Quoted message said:

    Stanford, just doing a workout on our track. He did his wamup jog of 4


    laps

    Quoted message said:

    barefoot on the infield, which is the same thing that I do and I have high
    school runners do. We also do drills barefoot on grass.

    Now, I actually live at the beach and do morning runs barefoot on days I


    don't

    Quoted message said:

    do a track workout. Obviously, there aren't too many beaches in Colorado
    Springs. But I think that just about everyone serious enough about


    running to

    Quoted message said:

    warm up properly (including some ROM drills) can find a track infield or


    soccer

    Quoted message said:

    field, or something of the kind that they can actually run barefoot on.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Wouldn't actually running barefoot be a better simulation ?

    How are these different from flats anyway ?

    Not sure, from what I can tell and the scuttlebutt from a friend (at
    Reebok actually), the shoes are a bit more substantial than flats and


    would

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    be more durable.


    My understanding is that these are not running shoes, per se. These are


    WARMUP

    Quoted message said:

    shoes with something like 50 flex points (where the typical running shoes


    have

    Quoted message said:

    1 or 2) to emulate the feel of running barefoot. If you read the pr stuff


    that

    Quoted message said:

    Nike has written about the Free, it talks about warmup sprints for


    football or

    Quoted message said:

    drills for running. Nowhere do they talk about doing marathon training in
    these, and I would think that anyone who tries to replace regular running


    shoes

    Quoted message said:

    with the Free is going to be diappointed.

    What they're trying to sell these shoes for, you can do without any shoes,


    for

    Quoted message said:

    free.

    Lyndon
    "Speed Kills...It kills those that don't have it!" --US Olympic Track


    Coach

    Quoted message said:

    Brooks Johnson

    I agree that some barefoot work can be a good thing, at least in theory. I
    once had a routine of doing some speed on a football field. Less time now
    and that has gone out the back.

  9. Too bad you don't know how to snip a post you numbnutz jerkoff.

    "Sam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "<snip BS for a one paragraph reply>

  10. "Lyndon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My understanding is that these are not running shoes, per se. These are


    WARMUP

    Quoted message said:

    shoes with something like 50 flex points (where the typical running shoes


    have

    Quoted message said:

    1 or 2) to emulate the feel of running barefoot. If you read the pr stuff


    that

    Quoted message said:

    Nike has written about the Free, it talks about warmup sprints for


    football or

    Quoted message said:

    drills for running. Nowhere do they talk about doing marathon training in
    these, and I would think that anyone who tries to replace regular running


    shoes

    Quoted message said:

    with the Free is going to be diappointed.

    Actually, I tried to go by Niketown here in LA to try them on today.
    Apparently they were supposed to be released today, but they didn't get
    their shipment.

    The lady on the phone there told me that there are two models--one for
    cross-training and one for running. The former is $90, while the latter is
    $85...according to her. Whether they are only intended for running *drills*
    I don't know, but there are two separate models.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.