Hey folks - dunno if you've heard yet, but the server will no longer be a
free one, from April 1st - not a fools joke.
10 EURO per year. I still think it's worth it for their kind of service
though.
Shaun aRe
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Hey folks - dunno if you've heard yet, but the server will no longer be a
free one, from April 1st - not a fools joke.
10 EURO per year. I still think it's worth it for their kind of service
though.
Shaun aRe
In article said:Hey folks - dunno if you've heard yet, but the server will no longer be a
free one, from April 1st - not a fools joke.10 EURO per year. I still think it's worth it for their kind of service
though.
Same thoughts here; for ~6ish quid a year it's worth it for the
service. Just need to make sure I get round to stumping up before I get
cut off at the knee, so to speak.
--
Tim.
"Tim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article said:Hey folks - dunno if you've heard yet, but the server will no longer be
a
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:free one, from April 1st - not a fools joke.
10 EURO per year. I still think it's worth it for their kind of service
though.
Same thoughts here; for ~6ish quid a year it's worth it for the
service.
Yeah, funny how in another group I use, all I read was [censored] and requests
for knowledge of any other free server. I mean, I haven't heard of a paid
for one that's been more reliable than NID anyway.
Quoted message said:Just need to make sure I get round to stumping up before I get
cut off at the knee, so to speak.
Same here.
Shaun aRe
Shaun aRe said:eah, funny how in another group I use, all I read was [censored] and requests
for knowledge of any other free server. I mean, I haven't heard of a paid
for one that's been more reliable than NID anyway.
I just signed up for broadband and have only been using Indiv for a
short time....was resigned to signing up for GigaNews once my old ISP
went away.
Is individual that reliable? If so, maybe I'll just stick with it...
On a tangental note, can anybody who uses Agent tell me what I'm doing
wrong that "Re:" gets concatted onto my subject headers?
Seems to fragment the threads...
"Shaun aRe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Hey folks - dunno if you've heard yet, but the server will no longer be a
free one, from April 1st - not a fools joke.10 EURO per year. I still think it's worth it for their kind of service
though.Shaun aRe
Ta for the inf.
"Peter J Cresswell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:52:58 -0000, "Shaun aRe"
Is individual that reliable? If so, maybe I'll just stick with it...
You wont hear me saying YES
That'd be like giving it the kiss of death.
Like the sports commentator who shouts out
'he's going to win'
errr
oops !!
Peter J Cresswell said:Is individual that reliable? If so, maybe I'll just stick with it...
Yes, it is.
--
Slacker
"Peter J Cresswell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Shaun aRe said:eah, funny how in another group I use, all I read was [censored] and
requests
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:for knowledge of any other free server. I mean, I haven't heard of a paid
for one that's been more reliable than NID anyway.I just signed up for broadband and have only been using Indiv for a
short time....was resigned to signing up for GigaNews once my old ISP
went away.Is individual that reliable? If so, maybe I'll just stick with it...
IME they have been stellar, all round stellar.
Shaun aRe - German efficiency dontchaknow.
Shaun aRe
Per Shaun aRe:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Is individual that reliable? If so, maybe I'll just stick with it...
IME they have been stellar, all round stellar.
Just got finished reading their FAQ page.
It made a *really* good impression.... I think they'll get my money ASAP...I
just hope they make enough to stay with it.
--
PeteCresswell
Per (Pete Cresswell):
Quoted message said:It made a *really* good impression..
Except for register.php|Rules For Usage|Sender Address, which seemed kind of
strange to me.
It requires all users include a valid "From" address on their posts.
I can deal with that because I have a sophisticated-enough mail service that I
can supply an address to which messages will be put in a special place...and my
only hassle is deleting the hundreds of spams before that special place
overloads my mail allotment on the server.
But I think somebody with just one address is going to have problems. Maybe
not today or tomorrow, but over time as bots harvest their address from the NG
posts.
I used to post legit addresses in NGs and now my domain gets 7,000-8,000 spams
per day....granted most of them are dictionary attacks, but hundreds of them are
to legitimate addresses I put in NG posts before I caught on.
--
PeteCresswell
(Pete Cresswell) said:Per (Pete Cresswell):
Quoted message said:It made a *really* good impression..
Except for register.php|Rules For Usage|Sender Address, which seemed
kind of strange to me.It requires all users include a valid "From" address on their posts.
I can deal with that because I have a sophisticated-enough mail
service that I can supply an address to which messages will be put in
a special place...and my only hassle is deleting the hundreds of
spams before that special place overloads my mail allotment on the
server.But I think somebody with just one address is going to have problems.
Maybe not today or tomorrow, but over time as bots harvest their
address from the NG posts.I used to post legit addresses in NGs and now my domain gets
7,000-8,000 spams per day....granted most of them are dictionary
attacks, but hundreds of them are to legitimate addresses I put in NG
posts before I caught on.
Can't you just create a throw away account on hotmail or Yahoo and just
write it off?
Tom
tcmedara said:(Pete Cresswell) said:Per (Pete Cresswell):
Quoted message said:It made a *really* good impression..
Except for register.php|Rules For Usage|Sender Address, which seemed
kind of strange to me.It requires all users include a valid "From" address on their posts.
I can deal with that because I have a sophisticated-enough mail
service that I can supply an address to which messages will be put in
a special place...and my only hassle is deleting the hundreds of
spams before that special place overloads my mail allotment on the
server.But I think somebody with just one address is going to have problems.
Maybe not today or tomorrow, but over time as bots harvest their
address from the NG posts.I used to post legit addresses in NGs and now my domain gets
7,000-8,000 spams per day....granted most of them are dictionary
attacks, but hundreds of them are to legitimate addresses I put in NG
posts before I caught on.Can't you just create a throw away account on hotmail or Yahoo and just
write it off?Tom
That's what I did (yahoo) but my real email that I've had for years
suffers the same problems as Pete's.
Matt
"(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Per (Pete Cresswell):
Quoted message said:It made a *really* good impression..
Except for register.php|Rules For Usage|Sender Address, which seemed kind
of
Quoted message said:strange to me.
It requires all users include a valid "From" address on their posts.
I can deal with that because I have a sophisticated-enough mail service
that I
Quoted message said:can supply an address to which messages will be put in a special
place...and my
Quoted message said:only hassle is deleting the hundreds of spams before that special place
overloads my mail allotment on the server.But I think somebody with just one address is going to have problems.
Maybe
Quoted message said:not today or tomorrow, but over time as bots harvest their address from
the NG
Quoted message said:posts.
I used to post legit addresses in NGs and now my domain gets 7,000-8,000
spams
Quoted message said:per day....granted most of them are dictionary attacks, but hundreds of
them are
Quoted message said:to legitimate addresses I put in NG posts before I caught on.
Yeah, that bit is a bit of a problem. When I subbed from this new addy, it
took a day to get my first spam back. Mind you, I think I'd posted over 200
messages over 7 news groups, excluding the HUGELY crossposted messages...
heheheh...
Shaun aRe
Per Shaun aRe:
Quoted message said:Yeah, that bit is a bit of a problem. When I subbed from this new addy, it
took a day to get my first spam back. Mind you, I think I'd posted over 200
messages over 7 news groups, excluding the HUGELY crossposted messages...
heheheh...
I just got a reply from Individual.
Turns out I didn't read their FAQ carefully enough.
It did say that all posts must have a legit return address, but later
http://news.individual.net/faq.php#5.3 says it's all right to use the .invalid
suffix. Something about "not polluting the namespace"... I guess the
important thing from their perspective is not to have to deal with a lot of
addressed that don't hit on any name server...and ".invalid" is enough of a
standard that they have code in place to weed those guys out painlessly.
Based on their FAQ, their responses, and this thread they've got *my* money.
I just hope they make enough to stay in biz.
--
PeteCresswell
"(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Per Shaun aRe:
Quoted message said:Yeah, that bit is a bit of a problem. When I subbed from this new addy,
it
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:took a day to get my first spam back. Mind you, I think I'd posted over
200
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:messages over 7 news groups, excluding the HUGELY crossposted messages...
heheheh...I just got a reply from Individual.
Turns out I didn't read their FAQ carefully enough.
It did say that all posts must have a legit return address, but later
http://news.individual.net/faq.php#5.3 says it's all right to use the
..invalid
Quoted message said:suffix. Something about "not polluting the namespace"... I guess the
important thing from their perspective is not to have to deal with a lot
of
Quoted message said:addressed that don't hit on any name server...and ".invalid" is enough of
a
Quoted message said:standard that they have code in place to weed those guys out painlessly.
Based on their FAQ, their responses, and this thread they've got *my*
money.
Quoted message said:I just hope they make enough to stay in biz.
--
PeteCresswell
Cool - cheers Pete - I'll have to get around to remembering to get off my
[censored] and do something about that soon...ish ',;~}~
Cheers!
Shaun aRe
--
Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the
depths, surfaces with a severe case of the Benz.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.