General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

New web site: bechamp.org

Started by DRCEEPHD · · Last activity · 52 posts · 1,301 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 March 2004
Last activity
7 March 2004
Original author
DRCEEPHD
Posts
52
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,301
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 52
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Subject: New web site: bechamp.org
    From: bechamp.org [email hidden]
    Date: 3/4/04 2:18 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Announcing a new site: Bechamp.org

    The site www.bechamp.org is dedicated to the work of Antoine Bechamp.

    Fantastic. Please try to make it a moderated site where the skeptics will not
    be able to destroy any reasonable attempt at intelligent, scientific,
    discussion and debate.

    DrC PhD

    A Be'champ advocate.

    Pasteur was a con artist. The germ theory of disease is false. Be'champ
    proved it scientifically. Pasteur admitted it on his death bed.

    Long live Be'champs research.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote:

    [Snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Pasteur was a con artist. The germ theory of disease is false. Be'champ
    proved it scientifically. Pasteur admitted it on his death bed.

    Pasteur did no such thing. I note that, although you like to make the
    claim that Pasteur admitted his work was wrong on his deathbed, you are
    very much averse to actually providing convincing evidence that Pasteur
    ever said such a thing as he lay dying.

    [Snip]

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRCEEPHD said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: New web site: bechamp.org
    From: bechamp.org [email hidden]
    Date: 3/4/04 2:18 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Announcing a new site: Bechamp.org

    The site www.bechamp.org is dedicated to the work of Antoine Bechamp.

    Fantastic. Please try to make it a moderated site where the skeptics will not
    be able to destroy any reasonable attempt at intelligent, scientific,
    discussion and debate.

    Translation: "Please make it a place where nobody will contradict
    anything I believe, no matter how stupid my beliefs may be."

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  4. "David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRCEEPHD said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: New web site: bechamp.org
    From: bechamp.org [email hidden]
    Date: 3/4/04 2:18 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Announcing a new site: Bechamp.org

    The site www.bechamp.org is dedicated to the work of Antoine Bechamp.

    Fantastic. Please try to make it a moderated site where the skeptics


    will not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    be able to destroy any reasonable attempt at intelligent, scientific,
    discussion and debate.

    Translation: "Please make it a place where nobody will contradict
    anything I believe, no matter how stupid my beliefs may be."

    David,

    I dont think you were invited, so no need to comment. Thanks.

    Cheers, Rod.

    Quoted message said:


    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  5. I don't have this article maybe someone can get hold of it?
    5. Delhoume, Leon, De Claude Bernard a d'Arsonval. Lib Bailliere et fils,
    Paris, 1939, 595pp~
    Anth
    [snip]

  6. Announcing a new site: Bechamp.org

    The site www.bechamp.org is dedicated to the work of Antoine Bechamp.
    It will be an ongoing collection of articles, links and research
    connected with both Bechamp's work, and the pleomorphic approach to
    cellular biology in general. As such, you'll also find material
    relating to the work of researchers such as Rife, Naessens and others.

    Any articles, images or other resources, and link suggestions or swaps
    are most welcome.

    dminoz / bechamp.org

  7. The Blunder from Down under uttereth...

    "Rod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRCEEPHD said:

    >Subject: New web site: bechamp.org
    >From: bechamp.org [email hidden]
    >Date: 3/4/04 2:18 PM Eastern Standard Time
    >Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    >Announcing a new site: Bechamp.org
    >
    >The site www.bechamp.org is dedicated to the work of Antoine Bechamp.

    Fantastic. Please try to make it a moderated site where the skeptics


    will not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    be able to destroy any reasonable attempt at intelligent, scientific,
    discussion and debate.

    Translation: "Please make it a place where nobody will contradict
    anything I believe, no matter how stupid my beliefs may be."

    David,

    I dont think you were invited, so no need to comment. Thanks.

    That was so negative.....

    BTW, where is YOUR invite?

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    bechamp.org said:
    Orac said:

    Pasteur did no such thing. I note that, although you like to make the
    claim that Pasteur admitted his work was wrong on his deathbed, you are
    very much averse to actually providing convincing evidence that Pasteur
    ever said such a thing as he lay dying.

    DrC, thanks for your encouragment.

    Orac, from what I've read, it's generally accepted that Pasteur said
    either "the field is everything" or "the terrain is everything",
    depending on the translation. It could, of course, be wrong; it is
    impossible to prove one way or the other whether he actually said it
    or not. We CAN, however, look for a reasonable degree of
    documentation.

    Then feel free to provide the documentation that Pasteur did indeed say
    on his deathbed what was claimed.

    Quoted message said:

    Feel free to provide what you can to support the idea
    that he said no such thing.

    Logical fallacy used: Shifting the burden of proof. I'm not the one
    claiming Pasteur said this; I am the one voicing skepticism and asking
    for evidence to support "Dr. C's" assertion that Pasteur said such a
    thing.

    See:
    http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
    http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#shifting

    Quoted message said:

    Equally, I would be interested in seeing
    any evidence that supports the idea that he DID say such a thing.

    I have been unable to find any evidence that he did say such a thing,
    and I have looked for it on and off when this issue comes up.
    Consequently, I was challenging "Dr. C" to provide his source for this
    supposed deathbed statement of Pasteur's. "Dr. C" is very good at making
    assertions, but very bad at actually providing evidence to back those
    assertions up.

    [Snip

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  9. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: New web site: bechamp.org
    From: bechamp.org [email hidden]
    Date: 3/5/04 12:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    DrC, thanks for your encouragment.

    Thanks. As a scientist, I am still amazed at what Bechamp accomplished given
    the knowledge and equipment of the time.

    Quoted message said:

    Orac, from what I've read, it's generally accepted that Pasteur said
    either "the field is everything" or "the terrain is everything",
    depending on the translation.

    The best response that I can recall is that while Pasteur lay dying, his
    personal biographer was present. In the biographer's later book, the
    biographer wrote that Pasteur uttered this phrase as a death bed confession:
    "Bernard was right. The bacteria are nothing. The soil is everything."

    Now, if you understand the conflict at the time and Bernard's role, the quote
    makes perfect sense.

    DrC PhD

    The germ theory of disease is false.
    Whole nations are being deceived by the medicines of Satan.
    This is the best explanation for what is occuring that I can find.
    It is no longer a prohpesy...we are living it.

  10. (TLCGOLFER) said:

    The best response that I can recall is that while Pasteur lay dying, his
    personal biographer was present. In the biographer's later book, the
    biographer wrote that Pasteur uttered this phrase as a death bed confession:
    "Bernard was right. The bacteria are nothing. The soil is everything."

    What was the name of the biographer? What was the title of the
    biography?

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    bechamp.org said:
    Orac said:

    Pasteur did no such thing. I note that, although you like to make the
    claim that Pasteur admitted his work was wrong on his deathbed, you are
    very much averse to actually providing convincing evidence that Pasteur
    ever said such a thing as he lay dying.

    DrC, thanks for your encouragment.

    Orac, from what I've read, it's generally accepted that Pasteur said
    either "the field is everything" or "the terrain is everything",
    depending on the translation. It could, of course, be wrong; it is
    impossible to prove one way or the other whether he actually said it
    or not. We CAN, however, look for a reasonable degree of
    documentation. Feel free to provide what you can to support the idea
    that he said no such thing. Equally, I would be interested in seeing
    any evidence that supports the idea that he DID say such a thing.

    The truth is all we're after, isn't it, gentlemen?

    Sounds like you are. I am.

    It's possible that Pasteur really *did* say that on his deathbed. But
    what if he was delirious? :-)

    Beyond that, however, it really doesn't matter *what* someone says on
    their deathbed -- it doesn't automatically make it true. For example,
    there's a pernicious lie, popular in creationist circles, that Darwin
    repudiated his theory of evolution on his deathbed. (He didn't, as we
    know from his daughter, who was there, unlike the liar who made this
    absurd claim.)

    If Newton had repudiated his theory of gravitation on his deathbed, it
    wouldn't cause apples to fall upwards.

    I've got no objection to your Bechamp web site, and I wish you success
    with it.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    bechamp.org said:

    On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 03:49:35 GMT, [email hidden] (David

    Wright) said:

    Translation: "Please make it a place where nobody will contradict
    anything I believe, no matter how stupid my beliefs may be."


    David, thanks for your input.

    You may find my approach to maintaining Bechamp.org to be
    disappointing. I'm a bit of a fan of scientific method, and I'm only
    after the truth. Any discussion of viewspoints or data which helps
    towards that end will be welcome. So, if you would like to contribute
    an article either for or against Bechamp or pleomorphism, I'll be
    happy to consider it for publication on the site; as long, of course,
    as it meets the basic requirements of writing and logical research.
    I'm not interested in diatribes; I am interested in research.

    Looking forward to hearing from you. I certainly don't want any giants
    standing on your shoulders.

    Very wise of you. It can be painful.

    However, I am not a biologist (nor is "Dr" Cee), so I'm not well-
    positioned to write such a paper. I do find the idea that bacteria
    can easily shift their forms to be highly suspicious -- if it were
    true, it would be relatively easy to prove, and the person who did the
    proving would be on the next plane to Stockholm to pick up his or her
    Nobel Prize.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  13. Well, apparently, Pasteur's "first" biographer was his son-in-law, Rene
    Vallery-Radot, who, on this basis, might well have been with him when he
    died in 1895.. S-I-L published "Vie De Pasteur" in 1900; it was
    translated into English as "Life of Pasteur" in 1919.

  14. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (David Wright) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    bechamp.org said:
    Orac said:

    Pasteur did no such thing. I note that, although you like to make the
    claim that Pasteur admitted his work was wrong on his deathbed, you are
    very much averse to actually providing convincing evidence that Pasteur
    ever said such a thing as he lay dying.

    DrC, thanks for your encouragment.

    Orac, from what I've read, it's generally accepted that Pasteur said
    either "the field is everything" or "the terrain is everything",
    depending on the translation. It could, of course, be wrong; it is
    impossible to prove one way or the other whether he actually said it
    or not. We CAN, however, look for a reasonable degree of
    documentation. Feel free to provide what you can to support the idea
    that he said no such thing. Equally, I would be interested in seeing
    any evidence that supports the idea that he DID say such a thing.

    The truth is all we're after, isn't it, gentlemen?

    Sounds like you are. I am.

    It's possible that Pasteur really *did* say that on his deathbed. But
    what if he was delirious? :-)

    Possible, given that Pasteur suffered more than one stroke in the weeks
    before his death. (He suffered a left-sided hemiparesis from a stroke he
    had suffered at age 46 that had made laboratory work increasingly
    difficult in his later years.) However, one account I came across had
    Pasteur listening to the life of St. Vincent de Paul, and by reports he
    kept his faculties until the end. (As an aside, Pasteur was a devout
    Catholic, which just goes to show that religious faith does not have to
    preclude scientific inquiry.)

    Although I see the claim replicated ad nauseum on the Internet that
    Pasteur admitted he was "wrong," the only source I have ever seen cited
    for this "terrain" quote is an old out of print book written in 1939
    (making it difficult to check the quote for context, what, if any,
    evidence is presented that Pasteur actually said it, etc.). In addition,
    the book is written in French, which most people contributing to this
    newsgroup don't read. I read some, but I can't say it would be good
    enough to follow anything other than very simple prose.

    The book is:

    Delhoume, Leon, De Claude Bernard a d'Arsonval. Lib Bailliere et fils,
    Paris, 1939.

    I have never been able to find another source cited for the alleged
    dying words of Pasteur that alties frequently claim. As a general rule
    of historical inquiry, for any quote attributed to a historical figure
    of such importance, particularly a quote in which this figure in essence
    supposedly contradicts his life work, it is a very good idea to require
    more than one source before accepting it, unless that one source
    presents unusually convincing evidence for the quote.

    Quoted message said:

    Beyond that, however, it really doesn't matter *what* someone says on
    their deathbed -- it doesn't automatically make it true. For example,
    there's a pernicious lie, popular in creationist circles, that Darwin
    repudiated his theory of evolution on his deathbed. (He didn't, as we
    know from his daughter, who was there, unlike the liar who made this
    absurd claim.)

    Quite true. Odd how certain scientists disliked by various ideologues
    (Darwin or Pasteur, for instance) are frequently said by those who don't
    accept their work to have admitted they were wrong on their deathbed.

    [Snip]

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  15. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (David Wright) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    bechamp.org said:

    On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 03:49:35 GMT, [email hidden] (David

    Wright) said:

    Translation: "Please make it a place where nobody will contradict
    anything I believe, no matter how stupid my beliefs may be."


    David, thanks for your input.

    You may find my approach to maintaining Bechamp.org to be
    disappointing. I'm a bit of a fan of scientific method, and I'm only
    after the truth. Any discussion of viewspoints or data which helps
    towards that end will be welcome. So, if you would like to contribute
    an article either for or against Bechamp or pleomorphism, I'll be
    happy to consider it for publication on the site; as long, of course,
    as it meets the basic requirements of writing and logical research.
    I'm not interested in diatribes; I am interested in research.

    Looking forward to hearing from you. I certainly don't want any giants
    standing on your shoulders.

    Very wise of you. It can be painful.

    However, I am not a biologist (nor is "Dr" Cee), so I'm not well-
    positioned to write such a paper. I do find the idea that bacteria
    can easily shift their forms to be highly suspicious -- if it were
    true, it would be relatively easy to prove, and the person who did the
    proving would be on the next plane to Stockholm to pick up his or her
    Nobel Prize.

    It is also forgotten that this idea of easily shifting bacteria was
    developed in the very infancy of microbiology, when the tools available
    for studying bacteria were exceedingly primitive compared to what we
    have today. Heck, even Gram stains (a very basic means of characterizing
    classes of bacteria) weren't developed until the 1870's.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  16. "TLCGOLFER" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The germ theory of disease is false.

    You are aware that childbed fever was almost eliminated once physicians
    started to wash their hands (remove bacteria) before examining the laboring
    women are you not? You are aware that antibiotics have caused remarkable
    improvements in the sick are you not? I have experienced vast improvement
    myself within hours of taking antibiotics.

    Quoted message said:

    Whole nations are being deceived by the medicines of Satan.

    Satan? .......???

    Quoted message said:

    This is the best explanation for what is occuring that I can find.
    It is no longer a prohpesy...we are living it.

    I fail to comprehend this claim.

    Kim

  17. (Yep apparently, although I've not been able to get the very article, it's
    in there whether or not)
    You have to understand that sick people often say things that seem
    irrational - it's their way of dealing with things..
    Anth

    "bechamp.org" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:24:35 -0000, "Anth" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I don't have this article maybe someone can get hold of it?
    5. Delhoume, Leon, De Claude Bernard a d'Arsonval. Lib Bailliere et fils,
    Paris, 1939, 595pp~
    Anth
    [snip]

    Anth, I looked around the net for a reference to the above, and found
    this link:

    http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/arsonval.html

    I've never heard of this guy before. Very interesting. And Tesla found
    him interesting as well, it seems.

    But did you post the above with reference to the discussion of what
    Pasteur said before he died?

    Thanks
    dminoz / bechamp.org

  18. That makes sense, if people washed their hands and the disease rates lowered
    then that's a good pro argument for germ theory.
    The army use aerosols to dispense chemical weapons, if germ theory was
    incorrect in that sense then those aerosols would be unpredictable.
    Anth

    "Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "TLCGOLFER" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The germ theory of disease is false.

    You are aware that childbed fever was almost eliminated once physicians
    started to wash their hands (remove bacteria) before examining the


    laboring

    Quoted message said:

    women are you not? You are aware that antibiotics have caused remarkable
    improvements in the sick are you not? I have experienced vast improvement
    myself within hours of taking antibiotics.

    Quoted message said:

    Whole nations are being deceived by the medicines of Satan.

    Satan? .......???

    Quoted message said:

    This is the best explanation for what is occuring that I can find.
    It is no longer a prohpesy...we are living it.

    I fail to comprehend this claim.

    Kim

  19. Saying the germ theory of disease is wrong because Pasteur admitted it,
    isn't a proof that it is wrong.
    The theory is now much bigger than the man.
    Anth

    "bechamp.org" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Orac said:

    Pasteur did no such thing. I note that, although you like to make the
    claim that Pasteur admitted his work was wrong on his deathbed, you are
    very much averse to actually providing convincing evidence that Pasteur
    ever said such a thing as he lay dying.

    DrC, thanks for your encouragment.

    Orac, from what I've read, it's generally accepted that Pasteur said
    either "the field is everything" or "the terrain is everything",
    depending on the translation. It could, of course, be wrong; it is
    impossible to prove one way or the other whether he actually said it
    or not. We CAN, however, look for a reasonable degree of
    documentation. Feel free to provide what you can to support the idea
    that he said no such thing. Equally, I would be interested in seeing
    any evidence that supports the idea that he DID say such a thing.

    The truth is all we're after, isn't it, gentlemen?

    dminoz / bechamp.org

  20. Have you got that study which you claimed that chemotherapy showed increase
    in survival for stage IV colorectal cancer with liver metastasis?
    Anth

    Quoted message said:

    "Dr. C" is very good at making assertions, but very bad at actually


    providing evidence to back those assertions up.

    Quoted message said:


    [Snip

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.