On 2006-03-09, warrwych (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Quoted message said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=tech/2006/news/03-09
What a pointless excercise. The sole positive given was that it will
reduce human error in shifting in that final sprint -- of course, only
to be replaced by machine error.
So it saves a few grams in the shifters!? Only to be replaced by big
honking solonoids and C sized battery. I am surprised it gets away
with a C battery that last "months". I thought the shifting force
required was much greater than could be supplied by such a small
battery.
So the total weight of the gear changing mechanism surely has to be
about the same as a set of hub gears and shifters? Why not just bite
the bullet? If the best we can do to improving the horribly clunky
derailleur system over the past ... whatever decades is to add a
couple of electronic solenoids, we aren't doing very well, are we?
/me wants everyone else to buy hub gears so their price comes down and
I can afford them ๐
--
TimC
I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your
phone 90 degrees and try again. -- MIT's phone switch