"thebow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:So is my orignial assumption incorrect? My old bike is not worse that
a
Quoted message said:cheaper $1500 new ride?
Well, your old bike might not look as good, but, assuming it works,
it should be totally fine. Especially if you are more into mountain
biking. Shimano 600 was pretty good stuff wasn't it? I think it was
the old Ultegra?
Quoted message said:I am not sure pumping money into an older bike is a good idea but .
What is the advantage of fixing my old one and chucking a few bits on
rather than brand new?
Well, that all depends on what is "wrong" with it. If it needs some
bar tape, paint and more air in the tyres, you don't need a new bike.
If, the driveline fell off 3 years ago and the frame is only held
together
with sticky tape.. then maybe a new bike is the right way to go.
Tell us what's wrong with it and we can give you a better idea of
the cost/benefit with old versus new.
Quoted message said:I would have figured the extra gears, lighter frame and wheelset,
carbon
Quoted message said:fork etc would make for much better riding.
It's only a couple of extra gears. If you want to go faster, pedal
harder :-P
Lighter frame depends on the weight of your current one - don't assume
a new aluminium frame will be lighter, especially a cheaper one.
I have a carbon fork on my bike. I couldn't tell you if it makes the
ride
any nicer. I can tell you that I've read enough about sudden carbon
failure to worry about it a little.. not enought to swap it mind you,
but
the thought is there in the back of my mind.
If you have the money and if buying a new bike will make you ride
more then I'd always suggest going for it, but it's often not that bad
an idea to simply fix an older bike.
HTH
hippy
- owns new and old bikes alike and loves them all :-)