Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

New 10-watt(?) LED Light

Started by JamesE · · Last activity · 11 posts · 579 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 May 2004
Last activity
1 June 2004
Original author
JamesE
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
579
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The new Summer Performance catalog is featuring their new "ViewPoint GEN3"
    single Luxeon LED headlight. They claim "10 watts plus" coming out of 4 AA
    NiMH batteries that run 5 hours. There's a "Digital" model with 6 power
    modes and 5 flashing modes ($140) and a "Non-Digital" model that runs 8
    hours on "high" and 4 day on "low" ($60). The lights are made by Nite Hawk.

    I think what they really mean is the LED light is equivalent in brightness
    to a typical 10-watt halogen light. By my math 4 NiMH AA at 1.2 volts each
    will put out about 0.4 amps for 5 hours, which is really about 2 watts of
    power.

    Fuzzy marketing aside I'm eager to find out more about these lights. I mean
    if they really do put out the same lumens as a 10w halogen with a good beam
    pattern, and the GEN3's do it with only 4 AA's, then it's a light seriously
    worth considering.

    The GEN3 isn't on the Performance web page yet, nor is it mentioned on Nite
    Hawk's. The non-digital model can be seen at Nashbar's site -- search for
    "emitter."

  2. Quoted message said:

    The new Summer Performance catalog is featuring their
    new "ViewPoint GEN3" single Luxeon LED headlight.
    They claim "10 watts plus" coming out of 4 AA
    NiMH batteries that run 5 hours.

    Here's why their claim is hard to believe:

    (10 watts) x (5 hours) / (4 cells) = 12.5 watt-hours per cell

    Four watt-hours per AA cell is about the best you can expect. I'm
    thinking they're using a Luxeon 5-watt LED [URL below] and running the
    batteries dead flat, long after the light dims below full output (in
    about three hours), to get five hours out of them.

    Quoted message said:

    I think what they really mean is the LED light is equivalent
    in brightness to a typical 10-watt halogen light.

    From my experiments with bike lights, I'd say there seems to be about a
    two-to-one ratio of apparent brightness between LED and halogen lights,
    so the 5-watt LED may well look as bright as a 10-watt halogen.

    luxeonstar.comsub category.php

  3. I thought this was reaching a bit in the 10-watt claim as well. For
    comparison, here is a discussion on the performance of a caving lamp
    using a similar Luxeon LED. They claim it's 5 watts. It may be the same
    emitter.

    http://www.caves.org/imo/pdf/Nova%20discharge.pdf

    It's kind of vague, but in general it demonstrates that Speleotechnics
    claims about half the life for half the wattage of the Performance
    light. Also there are some instruction for its use.

    http://www.caves.org/imo/pdf/NOVA%20instructions.pdf

    Then again, it would be really nice if companies would start describing
    their lights in comparable terms, like using "Lux" or "lumens" to
    describe the actaul amount of light output by the light. Not many
    people understand these terms (I have to look it up all the time because
    I forget), but many companies are now using fake "Wattage" values in an
    attempt to compare LEDs with filament bulbs.

    Incidentally, the digital versions are the best thing in the world for
    caving. They do such a good job of flattening out the voltage curve
    that you never notice a drain on the battery, and you get maximum life
    out of the battery as well.

    -Collin

    LioNiNoiL_a t_Ne t s c a pE_D 0 T_Ne T said:
    Quoted message said:

    The new Summer Performance catalog is featuring their
    new "ViewPoint GEN3" single Luxeon LED headlight.
    They claim "10 watts plus" coming out of 4 AA NiMH batteries that run
    5 hours.

    Here's why their claim is hard to believe:

    (10 watts) x (5 hours) / (4 cells) = 12.5 watt-hours per cell

    Four watt-hours per AA cell is about the best you can expect. I'm
    thinking they're using a Luxeon 5-watt LED [URL below] and running the
    batteries dead flat, long after the light dims below full output (in
    about three hours), to get five hours out of them.

    Quoted message said:

    I think what they really mean is the LED light is equivalent
    in brightness to a typical 10-watt halogen light.

    From my experiments with bike lights, I'd say there seems to be about a
    two-to-one ratio of apparent brightness between LED and halogen lights,
    so the 5-watt LED may well look as bright as a 10-watt halogen.

    luxeonstar.comsub category.php

  4. For a *real* 10w equivalent LED headlight, see
    http://www.nova-factory.com/headlight.html. Not cheap though.

    Nick

    "JamesE" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The new Summer Performance catalog is featuring their new "ViewPoint GEN3"
    single Luxeon LED headlight. They claim "10 watts plus" coming out of 4 AA
    NiMH batteries that run 5 hours. There's a "Digital" model with 6 power
    modes and 5 flashing modes ($140) and a "Non-Digital" model that runs 8
    hours on "high" and 4 day on "low" ($60). The lights are made by Nite


    Hawk.

    Quoted message said:


    I think what they really mean is the LED light is equivalent in brightness
    to a typical 10-watt halogen light. By my math 4 NiMH AA at 1.2 volts each
    will put out about 0.4 amps for 5 hours, which is really about 2 watts of
    power.

  5. Watts, in this application, is a unit of heat dissipation. The average LED
    at maximum brightness produces about 1.4 milliWatts. You'd need over 7000
    LED's to produce 10 Watts. Another draw-back is the light produced by an LED
    is very directional. The trick designers use to make them good headlights is
    reflector and lense design. I've got a Cateye Opticube and I love it. The
    other posts had it right about rating output in Watts as deceptive. They
    should rate them by lumens or candlepower.

    LAN Support <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    For a *real* 10w equivalent LED headlight, see
    http://www.nova-factory.com/headlight.html. Not cheap though.

    Nick

    "JamesE" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The new Summer Performance catalog is featuring their new "ViewPoint


    GEN3"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    single Luxeon LED headlight. They claim "10 watts plus" coming out of 4


    AA

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    NiMH batteries that run 5 hours. There's a "Digital" model with 6 power
    modes and 5 flashing modes ($140) and a "Non-Digital" model that runs 8
    hours on "high" and 4 day on "low" ($60). The lights are made by Nite


    Hawk.

    Quoted message said:


    I think what they really mean is the LED light is equivalent in


    brightness

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to a typical 10-watt halogen light. By my math 4 NiMH AA at 1.2 volts


    each

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    will put out about 0.4 amps for 5 hours, which is really about 2 watts


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    power.

  6. El Calaverada said: "Watts, in this application, is a unit of heat
    dissipation. The average LED at maximum brightness produces about 1.4
    milliWatts. You'd need over 7000 LED's to produce 10 Watts. Another draw-
    back is the light produced by an LED is very directional. The trick
    designers use to make them good headlights is reflector and lense
    design. I've got a Cateye Opticube and I love it. The other posts had it
    right about rating output in Watts as deceptive. They should rate them
    by lumens or candlepower."

    P = IE Power equals current in amps times Voltage in Volts. Heat
    disapation isn't part of the equation. There are many different rated
    Light Emitting Diodes... some up to 5 Watts. Since they disapate very
    little heat, most of the energy is radiated in light. Yes, designers
    need to make the reflector aim the light in a most useful pattern.
    Lumens or candlepower can help understand the light output, but you also
    need to know the intensity across the pattern.... like a pencil beam or
    a wide angle beam.

    --

  7. daveornee said:

    P = IE Power equals current in amps times Voltage in Volts. Heat
    disapation isn't part of the equation.

    Unfortunately it is very much part of the equation. Even the best LEDs are
    not much more efficient than high-efficiency filament lamps and to a first
    approximation all of their power input is given out as heat.

    One of the reasons there has just been such a quantum leap in LED light
    output, is that in newer LEDs, the LED die (semiconductor part) is mounted
    on a metal die that conducts heat away from the die much more efficiently
    than can happen in old-style plastic-packaged LEDs that we are so
    familiar with. They still have a plastic window to let the light out, of
    course. New LEDs typically need to be mounted on metal heatsinks - like
    power transistors.

    Quoted message said:

    There are many different rated
    Light Emitting Diodes... some up to 5 Watts. Since they disapate very
    little heat, most of the energy is radiated in light.

    Red LEDs are typically much brighter than green LEDs with the same
    wattage, even though our eyes are more sensitive to green - yellow light.

    AC

  8. Is there really such a thing as a 5 Watt LED? What materials are they made
    from? Has someone come up with a new junction material capable of producing
    5 Watts without applying a huge current? I haven't been involved in design
    in quite a while, now I'm curious.

    anonymous coward <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    daveornee said:

    P = IE Power equals current in amps times Voltage in Volts. Heat
    disapation isn't part of the equation.

    Unfortunately it is very much part of the equation. Even the best LEDs are
    not much more efficient than high-efficiency filament lamps and to a first
    approximation all of their power input is given out as heat.

    One of the reasons there has just been such a quantum leap in LED light
    output, is that in newer LEDs, the LED die (semiconductor part) is mounted
    on a metal die that conducts heat away from the die much more efficiently
    than can happen in old-style plastic-packaged LEDs that we are so
    familiar with. They still have a plastic window to let the light out, of
    course. New LEDs typically need to be mounted on metal heatsinks - like
    power transistors.

    Quoted message said:

    There are many different rated
    Light Emitting Diodes... some up to 5 Watts. Since they disapate very
    little heat, most of the energy is radiated in light.

    Red LEDs are typically much brighter than green LEDs with the same
    wattage, even though our eyes are more sensitive to green - yellow light.

    AC

  9. El Calaverada said:

    Is there really such a thing as a 5 Watt LED?

    Yes - look up www.lumileds.com and www.roithner-lasertechnik.de

    Quoted message said:

    What materials are they made from?

    Pretty much the same materials as the old LEDs. One point is that these
    LEDs actually contain multiple junctions on each die. So in one sense
    they're parallel LEDs. I think the major innovations are in the packaging
    and thermal management.

    Quoted message said:

    Has someone come up with a new junction material capable of producing
    5 Watts without applying a huge current?

    No... LEDs used to use such a small current, because their light output
    was quite low. They were bright enough to see, but not bright enough to
    be seen by... Now that they produce a lot of light, they use a lot of
    current to match. Power (watts) = Volts x Amps. 'owt for nowt, alas.

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't been involved in design in quite a while, now I'm curious.

    They will take over the world. (I use them, but have no connection with
    the company).

    AC

  10. Anonymous Cowar said:
    daveornee said:

    P = IE Power equals current in amps times Voltage in Volts. Heat
    disapation isn't part of the equation.


    Unfortunately it is very much part of the equation. Even the best LEDs
    are not much more efficient than high-efficiency filament lamps and to a
    first approximation all of their power input is given out as heat.
    One of the reasons there has just been such a quantum leap in LED light
    output, is that in newer LEDs, the LED die (semiconductor part) is
    mounted on a metal die that conducts heat away from the die much more
    efficiently than can happen in old-style plastic-packaged LEDs that we
    are so familiar with. They still have a plastic window to let the light
    out, of course. New LEDs typically need to be mounted on metal heatsinks
    - like power transistors.

    Quoted message said:

    There are many different rated Light Emitting Diodes... some up to 5
    Watts. Since they disapate very little heat, most of the energy is
    radiated in light.


    Red LEDs are typically much brighter than green LEDs with the
    same wattage, even though our eyes are more sensitive to green -
    yellow light.
    AC

    P = I*E are all electrical terms that do NOT include heat in the
    equation. The input power... power required from the source is measured
    in Watts. You arrive at the input power by multiplying Volts times Amps.
    The frequency of the light and human perception of the brightness are
    also important, but not part of the input power equation. Distribution
    of the light is also important, but not part of the input power
    equation. Point taken on LED efficiency compared to incandescents, and
    the need to disapate heat. Light output and heat disapation are very
    important, but not part of the equation.... that's my point. I stand
    ready for more "illumination" on the subject.

    --

  11. AC,
    Thank you for the info. Take care -

    anonymous coward <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    El Calaverada said:

    Is there really such a thing as a 5 Watt LED?

    Yes - look up www.lumileds.com and www.roithner-lasertechnik.de

    Quoted message said:

    What materials are they made from?

    Pretty much the same materials as the old LEDs. One point is that these
    LEDs actually contain multiple junctions on each die. So in one sense
    they're parallel LEDs. I think the major innovations are in the packaging
    and thermal management.

    Quoted message said:

    Has someone come up with a new junction material capable of producing
    5 Watts without applying a huge current?

    No... LEDs used to use such a small current, because their light output
    was quite low. They were bright enough to see, but not bright enough to
    be seen by... Now that they produce a lot of light, they use a lot of
    current to match. Power (watts) = Volts x Amps. 'owt for nowt, alas.

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't been involved in design in quite a while, now I'm curious.

    They will take over the world. (I use them, but have no connection with
    the company).

    AC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.