UK and Europe · Public discussion

"never use the max. PSI pressure from the sidewall"

Started by spokes · · Last activity · 11 posts · 895 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 January 2008
Last activity
2 February 2008
Original author
spokes
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
895
Views / 30 days
10
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Following my third visit from the p*nct*re fairy in a week, I was googling
    around on 'flat-proof tyres' and came across a discussion
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-218157.html
    featuring the quote in the subject line.

    I've got used to standardising on 100psi with my Grand Prix 2000s, which is
    well within their supposed max (and I'm about 11 stone, so not a massive
    load). And I checked the Sheldon link provided, which seemed to suggest
    c.100 would be about right for me. I guess 'try it see' is an obvious
    answer, but should I take them down to 80 or something? Any thoughts? What
    do other people do? (I'd always previously thought that problems came when
    you didn't inflate *enough*.)

  2. "spokes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Following my third visit from the p*nct*re fairy in a week, I was googling
    around on 'flat-proof tyres' and came across a discussion
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-218157.html
    featuring the quote in the subject line.

    I've got used to standardising on 100psi with my Grand Prix 2000s, which
    is well within their supposed max (and I'm about 11 stone, so not a
    massive load). And I checked the Sheldon link provided, which seemed to
    suggest c.100 would be about right for me. I guess 'try it see' is an
    obvious answer, but should I take them down to 80 or something? Any
    thoughts? What do other people do? (I'd always previously thought that
    problems came when you didn't inflate *enough*.)

    Tandems routinely use pressures above the max, so I wouldn't worry about
    going with what it says.

    100psi would be a good starting point - if you're happy with that, stick
    with it.

    cheers,
    clive

  3. spokes said:

    Following my third visit from the p*nct*re fairy in a week, I was googling
    around on 'flat-proof tyres' and came across a discussion
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-218157.html
    featuring the quote in the subject line.

    I've got used to standardising on 100psi with my Grand Prix 2000s, which is
    well within their supposed max (and I'm about 11 stone, so not a massive
    load). And I checked the Sheldon link provided, which seemed to suggest
    c.100 would be about right for me. I guess 'try it see' is an obvious
    answer, but should I take them down to 80 or something? Any thoughts? What
    do other people do? (I'd always previously thought that problems came when
    you didn't inflate *enough*.)

    I always go with the max, too many punctures otherwise.

    Cheers,

    --
    bob [at] bobarnott [dot] com http://www.bobarnott.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Crash programs fail because they are based on theory that,
    with nine women pregnant, you can get a baby in a month."
    -- Wernher von Braun

  4. spokes said:

    Following my third visit from the p*nct*re fairy in a week, I was
    googling around on 'flat-proof tyres' and came across a discussion
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-218157.html
    featuring the quote in the subject line.

    That's a load of crapola. The "max" is often about right, or sometimes a
    bit too low, or sometimes a bit too high.

    Quoted message said:

    I've got used to standardising on 100psi with my Grand Prix 2000s,
    which is well within their supposed max (and I'm about 11 stone, so
    not a massive load). And I checked the Sheldon link provided, which
    seemed to suggest c.100 would be about right for me. I guess 'try it see'
    is an obvious answer, but should I take them down to 80 or
    something? Any thoughts? What do other people do? (I'd always
    previously thought that problems came when you didn't inflate
    *enough*.)

    You have not stated the width (aka depth) of the tyres. No one can
    recommend a specific pressure until that is known. A 23mm tyre at 100 psi
    is significantly softer than a 25mm tyre at 100 psi, for example. Basic
    physics, innit.

    Some theories say tyres puncture more easily the harder they are, and some
    the opposite. Certainly tyres will be more prone to the pinch-flat or
    snakebite type of puncture when they're soft. Anyway, you should use the
    pressure that's the best compromise between grip, comfort and speed for your
    liking. If getting too many punctures, consider more puncture resistant
    tyres. Using a different pressure is not the answer.

    I can't remember what GP 2000s are like. If lightweight racing tyres,
    consider something a bit more substantial (but still quite light & slick)
    like Vittoria Rubino Pro - and in size 25 if you currently use 23s.
    For even more puncture resistance, there's Panaracer Pasela, Specialized
    Armadillo, and ultimately, Schwalbe Marathon Plus.

    ~PB

  5. spokes said:

    Following my third visit from the p*nct*re fairy in a week, I was googling
    around on 'flat-proof tyres' and came across a discussion
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/index.php/t-218157.html
    featuring the quote in the subject line.

    I've got used to standardising on 100psi with my Grand Prix 2000s, which
    is well within their supposed max (and I'm about 11 stone, so not a
    massive load). And I checked the Sheldon link provided, which seemed to
    suggest
    c.100 would be about right for me. I guess 'try it see' is an obvious
    answer, but should I take them down to 80 or something? Any thoughts? What
    do other people do? (I'd always previously thought that problems came when
    you didn't inflate *enough*.)

    Lower pressure = more punctures, on the whole. Take 'em up to their max, but
    not when there's ice on the road.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; "If I were a Microsoft Public Relations person, I would probably
    ;; be sobbing on a desk right now" -- Rob Miller, editor, /.

  6. Simon Brooke said:

    Lower pressure = more punctures, on the whole. Take 'em up to their
    max, but not when there's ice on the road.

    Higher pressure means the tyre is forced harder onto an object, meaning the
    object is more likely to puncture the tyre. I don't think pressure should
    be reduced for this reason though (see my previous reply).

    ~PB

  7. Pete Biggs said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    Lower pressure = more punctures, on the whole. Take 'em up to their
    max, but not when there's ice on the road.

    Higher pressure means the tyre is forced harder onto an object, meaning the
    object is more likely to puncture the tyre. I don't think pressure should
    be reduced for this reason though (see my previous reply).

    Although lower pressures can mean pinch flats.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Pete Biggs
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    Lower pressure = more punctures, on the whole. Take 'em up to their
    max, but not when there's ice on the road.

    Higher pressure means the tyre is forced harder onto an object, meaning the
    object is more likely to puncture the tyre.

    Or it means the tyre deflects less, so the object is more likely to be
    flicked aside than to stick in. I suspect a lot depends on the type and
    position of the object, the tread pattern and compound ...

  9. Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Pete Biggs
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    Lower pressure = more punctures, on the whole. Take 'em up to their
    max, but not when there's ice on the road.

    Higher pressure means the tyre is forced harder onto an object,
    meaning the object is more likely to puncture the tyre.

    Or it means the tyre deflects less, so the object is more likely to be
    flicked aside than to stick in. I suspect a lot depends on the type
    and position of the object, the tread pattern and compound ...

    Altogether it's such a complex phenomenonen that we might as well put it
    down to "luck".

    ~PB

  10. Quoted message said:


    Altogether it's such a complex phenomenonen that we might as well put it
    down to "luck".

    ~PB

    Or to put it another way, noone really has any idea whether it's best,
    p*nctu*e-wise, to keep your tyres hard or soft. (Or, more accurately, quite
    a few people have firm ideas - but those ideas are often diametrically
    opposed.)

    I do find it quite surprising that something so fundamental has presumably
    never been tested properly in real world conditions, given that it would
    have quite significant implications for countless millions of people all
    over the world. Strange.

    I think I'll stick at 100 and take my chances. (Oh, and in answer to PB's
    earlier query - sorry, should've mentioned - 23mm tyres. And these are not
    pinch/spoke problems - they're always glass shards coming straight thru'.)

    I've had better "luck" the last few days...glad to say.

  11. I suggest trying 110 to 120 psi in the rear tyre - for a bit more

    Quoted message said:

    speed and tyre life. (Rear should be harder than front as it takes more
    weight).

    Ok - thanks for that. I'll give it a try.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.