Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Need some help chosing a new rim

Started by Brett Jaffee · · Last activity · 7 posts · 2,434 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
12 July 2004
Last activity
12 July 2004
Original author
Brett Jaffee
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,434
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've had my FS bike (Kona Dawg) for about 9 months, and I'm
    already on my second rear wheel...a Mavic 223 disc (same
    type as what came on the bike). That wheel has a dent in it
    too, though.

    I weigh 200lbs, and while I don't consider myself very fast,
    I am evidently hard on rear wheels. That's probably not
    going to change, despite my best efforts. So, I'm thinking
    about going with a somewhat stronger rim, hopefully without
    going overboard.

    Here's the alphabet soup I'm looking at:

    Mavic XM719: Apparently stronger then the 223, but its a rim
    brake rim (I have discs)... not sure if that makes a diff.
    This wheel replaces the older Mavic 517, btw.

    Mavic XM819 disc: About the same weight (465grams) as the
    719, but disc specific. However, its a UST wheel, and I
    don't really want to go tubless, so I dunno if this makes
    sense for me.

    Mavic XM321 disc: A much heavier rim than either of the two
    above (570 grams). Replaces the old Mavic F219.

    Sun Rhynolite XL: Heavy duty rim, pretty much the same
    weight as the XM
    321.

    People have told me that the 321 and the Rhynolyte would be
    overkill, especially since they add so much weight. Assuming
    that's the case, any thoughts on the rim brake 719 vs the
    disc-specific but UST 819?

  2. Brett Jaffee said:

    I've had my FS bike (Kona Dawg) for about 9 months, and
    I'm already on my second rear wheel...a Mavic 223 disc
    (same type as what came on the bike). That wheel has a
    dent in it too, though.

    I weigh 200lbs, and while I don't consider myself very
    fast, I am evidently hard on rear wheels. That's probably
    not going to change, despite my best efforts. So, I'm
    thinking about going with a somewhat stronger rim,
    hopefully without going overboard.

    Here's the alphabet soup I'm looking at:

    Mavic XM719: Apparently stronger then the 223, but its a
    rim brake rim (I have discs)... not sure if that makes a
    diff. This wheel replaces the older Mavic 517, btw.

    Mavic XM819 disc: About the same weight (465grams) as the
    719, but disc specific. However, its a UST wheel, and I
    don't really want to go tubless, so I dunno if this makes
    sense for me.

    Mavic XM321 disc: A much heavier rim than either of the
    two above (570 grams). Replaces the old Mavic F219.

    Sun Rhynolite XL: Heavy duty rim, pretty much the same
    weight as the XM
    321.

    People have told me that the 321 and the Rhynolyte would
    be overkill, especially since they add so much weight.
    Assuming that's the case, any thoughts on the rim brake
    719 vs the disc-specific but UST 819?

    The EX 721 (old 521) is what you need. It's a great rim and
    can hold up to your weight, no problem.

    Forget about the weight, you need strong rim firstly.

    --
    Slacker

  3. Slacker <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    The EX 721 (old 521) is what you need. It's a great rim
    and can hold up to your weight, no problem.

    Thanks. I understand what you're saying, but by all acounts,
    the 223's aren't the greatest rims. I figure I might try an
    incremental jump.

    Quoted message said:


    Forget about the weight, you need strong rim firstly.

    True, but those 721's are really heavy. FWIW, I'm not
    tacoing the 223's. The first went slightly out of round (I
    couldn't feel it, but I kept breaking spokes), and the
    second has a small dent in the side. If I was totally
    destroying them, I'd think more about getting a much more
    heavy duty rim.

  4. Brett Jaffee said...

    Quoted message said:

    I've had my FS bike (Kona Dawg) for about 9 months, and
    I'm already on my second rear wheel...a Mavic 223 disc
    (same type as what came on the bike). That wheel has a
    dent in it too, though.

    I weigh 200lbs, and while I don't consider myself very
    fast, I am evidently hard on rear wheels. That's probably
    not going to change, despite my best efforts. So, I'm
    thinking about going with a somewhat stronger rim,
    hopefully without going overboard.

    Here's the alphabet soup I'm looking at:

    Mavic XM719: Apparently stronger then the 223, but its a
    rim brake rim (I have discs)... not sure if that makes a
    diff. This wheel replaces the older Mavic 517, btw.

    Quoted message said:

    Mavic XM819 disc: About the same weight (465grams) as the
    719, but disc specific. However, its a UST wheel, and I
    don't really want to go tubless, so I dunno if this makes
    sense for me.

    You don't have to use tubless (sic) tires on a UST rim. You
    can use regular tub(e)s and ordinary tires if you want. The
    weight given by Mavic apparently doesn't include the huge
    threaded eyelets that you need for the 'fore' design.

    Quoted message said:

    Mavic XM321 disc: A much heavier rim than either of the
    two above (570 grams). Replaces the old Mavic F219.

    Dude, you weigh 200lbs and you are worried about 3oz extra
    weight? Time for a reality check. I would be a lot more
    worried about keeping rims on the bike. I think this one is
    the logical choice.

    Quoted message said:

    Sun Rhynolite XL: Heavy duty rim, pretty much the same
    weight as the XM
    321.

    A wide downhill rim. Be aware that wide rims will require
    wide tires, so you may not be able to use anything less than
    a 2.1. That is the case for the EX series Mavic rims that
    Slacker recommended. Actually, you may be able to use
    somewhat narrower tires, but it would be outside
    manufacturer specs. The regular Rhyno Lite is the same but
    narrower and would be a more versatile choice.

    Quoted message said:

    People have told me that the 321 and the Rhynolyte would
    be overkill, especially since they add so much weight.
    Assuming that's the case, any thoughts on the rim brake
    719 vs the disc-specific but UST 819?

    Those people are full of doo-doo. You need a rim that will
    support your weight and riding style.

  5. SuperSlinky <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    You don't have to use tubless (sic) tires on a UST rim.
    You can use regular tub(e)s and ordinary tires if you
    want. The weight given by Mavic apparently doesn't
    include the huge threaded eyelets that you need for the
    'fore' design.

    Sorry, what's the "fore" design?

    Quoted message said:

    Dude, you weigh 200lbs and you are worried about 3oz extra
    weight? Time for a reality check. I would be a lot more
    worried about keeping rims on the bike. I think this one
    is the logical choice.

    Heh, no...3oz by itself wouldnt worry me (comparing the
    Rhyno/321 with the
    721), but the Rhynos are already nearly a 1/2 pound heavier
    then the other choices. My understanding is that it's
    going to be weight added to the bike in the worst
    possible place. Adding 1/2 pound wouldn't worry me too
    much anywhere else on the bike except the wheels.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Sun Rhynolite XL: Heavy duty rim, pretty much the same
    weight as the XM 321.

    A wide downhill rim. Be aware that wide rims will require
    wide tires, so you may not be able to use anything less
    than a 2.1.

    That's cool. I typically use Panaracer Fire 2.1's anyway.

  6. Brett Jaffee said...

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, what's the "fore" design?

    The spoke holes are drilled only through the rim wall
    facing the hub leaving the inner wall without holes and
    airtight for tubeless tires. The spoke nipples are then
    installed from the top using a threaded eyelet instead of
    from the bottom.

    Quoted message said:

    Heh, no...3oz by itself wouldnt worry me (comparing the
    Rhyno/321 with the
    721), but the Rhynos are already nearly a 1/2 pound
    heavier then the other choices. My understanding is
    that it's going to be weight added to the bike in the
    worst possible place. Adding 1/2 pound wouldn't worry
    me too much anywhere else on the bike except the
    wheels.

    I guess I just don't understand the worry about weight since
    the Dawg is a heavy bike with lots of heavy components. And
    with you being 200lbs, it isn't something that you will
    notice. You could make up that 7oz a dozen ways, probably
    just by switching to lighter tires. Rolling weight isn't
    infinitely more important than any other weight, maybe it is
    worth twice as much, but no more. Losing one pound from the
    engine (that's you) would be more valuable. Aside from all
    that, you evidently need a sturdy rim. Them's the breaks. If
    I had just trashed two rims, I would stop wasting time and
    money and get something that works. Disc specific rims are
    stronger than the rim brake counterparts. The lightest rim
    in your list isn't a disc rim, therefore it will be the
    weakest. Pay your money and take your chances I guess.

  7. SuperSlinky <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I guess I just don't understand the worry about weight
    since the Dawg is a heavy bike with lots of heavy
    components. And with you being 200lbs, it isn't something
    that you will notice. You could make up that 7oz a dozen
    ways, probably just by switching to lighter tires. Rolling
    weight isn't infinitely more important than any other
    weight, maybe it is worth twice as much, but no more.
    Losing one pound from the engine (that's you) would be
    more valuable. Aside from all that, you evidently need a
    sturdy rim. Them's the breaks. If I had just trashed two
    rims, I would stop wasting time and money and get
    something that works. Disc specific rims are stronger than
    the rim brake counterparts. The lightest rim in your list
    isn't a disc rim, therefore it will be the weakest. Pay
    your money and take your chances I guess.

    I'm not really disagreeing with anything you're saying. It's
    just that I don't see myself as that hard a rider as to need
    a hard-core freeride rim, versus a rim that might not be as
    strong as that, but will definitely be stronger then the
    223. Yeah, I might be taking a chance that those other rims
    might not hold up...but hey, I don't see any other way to
    find out what is really needed for how I ride.

    Anyway, I appreciate the input. Believe it or not, I haven't
    made up my mind yet.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.