Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Need help decyphering marketspeak

Started by Squat'n Dive · · Last activity · 9 posts · 275 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 January 2008
Last activity
17 January 2008
Original author
Squat'n Dive
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
275
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What does "Compact" or "Compact Drive" refers in the new bike ads?

  2. These days it usually means a road crank with a 110mm BCD vs the 130mm BCD
    Shimano and 135mm BCD of Campagnolo.

    It used to mean an MTB 94BCD crank vs the 110BCD cranks that used to be the
    standard.

    Nick

    "Squat'n Dive" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What does "Compact" or "Compact Drive" refers in the new bike ads?

  3. Nick Payne said:

    These days it usually means a road crank with a 110mm BCD vs the 130mm BCD
    Shimano and 135mm BCD of Campagnolo.


    BCD being Bolt Circle Diameter or smth?
    How does that affect the rider?

    Quoted message said:

    It used to mean an MTB 94BCD crank vs the 110BCD cranks that used to be the
    standard.


    Why did the bike makers move to 130/135?

  4. Squat'n Dive said:
    Nick Payne said:

    These days it usually means a road crank with a 110mm BCD vs the 130mm BCD
    Shimano and 135mm BCD of Campagnolo.


    BCD being Bolt Circle Diameter or smth?

    Bolt Circle Diameter.

    Quoted message said:

    How does that affect the rider?

    Not at all. Anything you can do with a compact gear set I can do with
    a not so compact.

    With 10 speed rear clusters sporting 11 teeth on the low side, you can
    use a smaller set of front chainwheels, making the compact practical
    in terms of having adequate gear range. Whether or not it aids
    shifting in any way... I doubt it... but one of the more modern riders
    can probably comment more authoritatively.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It used to mean an MTB 94BCD crank vs the 110BCD cranks that used to be the
    standard.


    Why did the bike makers move to 130/135?

    Same reason for most other bike changes: fashion. :-)

  5. "still just me" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    How does that affect the rider?

    Not at all. Anything you can do with a compact gear set I can do with
    a not so compact.

    On an MTB? The compact MTB drive allows lower gears than 110/74. Taking the
    small sprocket down to 11t and the big ring to 42 or so also means more
    ground clearance.

    On a road bike, the 110 BCD twin (modern 'compact' gearing) is typically
    used to get a lower bottom gear - 135mm gives you 39t AFAIK, whereas you can
    stick 34t on a 110. Which means no need to use a triple if you want lowish
    gears.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It used to mean an MTB 94BCD crank vs the 110BCD cranks that used to be
    the
    standard.


    Why did the bike makers move to 130/135?

    Same reason for most other bike changes: fashion. :-)

    The move from 110 to 94 on MTBs gave lower gears and more clearance.

    The 130/135 was on road bikes - there was no move from 110 to 130/135.

    And I write all this secure in knowledge that our tandems all have 110/74,
    including the MTB, and nice small rings are rather harder to find for that
    than 94/56 (or whatever compact MTB is) :-(

    cheers,
    clive

  6. Squat'n Dive said:

    What does "Compact" or "Compact Drive" refers in the new bike ads?

    'Compact' now just means neither a 52 nor a 53t outer ring. After that,
    many many variants, 22-32-42 to a 36-50.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  7. Quoted message said:
    Nick Payne said:

    These days it usually means a road crank with a 110mm BCD vs the 130mm BCD
    Shimano and 135mm BCD of Campagnolo.

    Squat'n Dive said:

    BCD being Bolt Circle Diameter or smth?
    How does that affect the rider?

    Quoted message said:

    More "Nick Payne" <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    It used to mean an MTB 94BCD crank vs the 110BCD cranks that used to be the
    standard.

    Squat'n Dive said:

    Why did the bike makers move to 130/135?

    'Why' introduces conjecture. Suffice to say fashion and marketing are
    powerful forces here, well beyond utility.

    Classic 151mm road cranks limit low gear to 44t. Many riders seemed to
    prefer 144m with a 42t limit* until the Japanese format 130mm (39t
    low*). Campagnolo, with a raging infection of "not invented here"
    countered with 135mm (39t low as well).

    In sales, the classic pitch is "the [censored] we sold you last year is no
    good; here's the new model", however nicely phrased.

    So, with a widely established base of various touring formats (110/74
    triple for example) the 110mm 'road compact' is hot as mountain bikes
    have moved on to four-bolt (104mm/64mm) and 94/58mm format. Campagnolo
    carbon compact cranks use a 110/112 asymmetric ring (one bolt askew).

    [*] in some of those formats, aftermarket 'cheater' rings one tooth
    smaller are/were available such as 144mm 41t, 130mm 38t, etc. They may
    require filing the end of the crank arm spider.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  8. Squat'n Dive said:

    What does "Compact" or "Compact Drive" refers in the new bike ads?

    Compact drivesets offer lower teeth chainrings with 110 bcd, they help
    for things like climbing without the need for a traditional three ring
    setup. I think.

    B.D

    http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com

  9. On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:05:12 -0800 (PST), "Squat'n Dive"

    may have said:

    What does "Compact" or "Compact Drive" refers in the new bike ads?

    "Compact drive" = small front sprockets. On a mountain bike, this
    usually means 42T or 44T on the big ring. On a roadie, it's a bit
    bigger, but still below the more historically customary 53T. The
    advent of the 11T sprocket on rear cassettes is most of the reason why
    these exist; if they kept using the larger front sprockets, you'd be
    likely to spend more time riding with a gear combo that stayed off the
    11T sprocket, which would mean that your cluster would last longer.
    By going to the smaller fronts, they increase the likelihood that
    you'll wear things out faster overall. (Not that I suspect a
    conspiracy here, you understand; it's doubtless just one of those
    additional consequences that naturally obtains as a result of a
    decision made for valid reasons of economization opportunity resulting
    from new design feature availability.)

    "Compact" by itself often refers to a frame with a non-horizontal top
    tube, whose seatpost must be considerably longer than would otherwise
    be required. The merits of this are debated from time to time.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.