General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Natropathetic

Started by markd · · Last activity · 6 posts · 678 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 February 2004
Last activity
16 February 2004
Original author
markd
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
678
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. We had this discussion in the ng of the below recently. Just one of the
    boys in the choir, "I'm ok you are ok and all of us in the choir telling
    each other we are ok is; well er ah OK". This from another ng:

    "The benefits, or otherwise, of using Naturopaths was discussed recently here.

    Just one recent local example:

    Naturopath gets five years for baby's deadly treatment
    smh.com.au1076548205730.html

    Of course, he can't serve the sentence because he has cancer. "Physician", heal thyself?"

  2. [email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow markd@toad-
    net.com rambled on about "Natropathetic." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts,
    thusly ...

    Quoted message said:

    Naturopath gets five years for baby's deadly treatment
    smh.com.au1076548205730.html

    Of course, he can't serve the sentence because he has cancer. "Physician", heal thyself?"

    As if a physician has never been busted and sued for killing their patients?

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    "... you have my sympathies" Science Officer Ash to Ripley, in the movie ALIEN.

  3. The distinction you make is important, the quack was not a physician, just a quack who killed a
    child and couldn't prevent cancer in himself; both testimonies to the effectivness of his "miricle
    pills" and anti scientific based medicine.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Naturopath gets five years for baby's deadly treatment
    smh.com.au1076548205730.html

    Of course, he can't serve the sentence because he has cancer. "Physician", heal thyself?"

    As if a physician has never been busted and sued for killing their patients?

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    "... you have my sympathies" Science Officer Ash to Ripley, in the movie ALIEN.

  4. [email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow markd@toad-
    net.com rambled on about "Re: Natropathetic." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition
    retorts, thusly ...

    Quoted message said:

    a quack who killed a child and couldn't prevent cancer in himself

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    So, says you ... years after the fact.

    What is the matter? Don't you read about current events? When they happen?

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

  5. [email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow markd@toad-
    net.com rambled on about "Re: Natropathetic." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition
    retorts, thusly ...

    Quoted message said:

    a quack who killed a child and couldn't prevent cancer in himself

    Speaking of Quacks ....

    story.news.yahoo.comnews
    ackreportonatkinsdeath "The report showed that Dr. Robert Atkins had a history of heart attack,
    congestive heart failure and hypertension, and that he was obese when he died, according to details
    published Tuesday by the Wall Street Journal. The newspaper received a copy of the medical
    examiner's report from a physicians group that promotes a vegetarian diet. ... The Journal reported
    that Atkins, who stood 6 feet tall, weighed 258 pounds at the time of his death."

    Dr. Robert Atkins was an MD, was he not?

  6. So are you saying the natropathetic quack is excused for the death of a child and failure to prevent
    cancer in himself because...?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.