UK and Europe · Public discussion

Narrowing Down Recumbent Options

Started by -Lsqnot Respond · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,388 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 February 2004
Last activity
20 February 2004
Original author
-Lsqnot Respond
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,388
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In case my wife reads this, I am only window shopping🙂

    But if I were, hypothetically speaking, thinking rather seriously about buying a recumbent which
    should I consider? My current hot pick is the HPV Grasshopper. Any others I should consider?

    My commute is 4 miles each way (or 8 if I avoid The Hill) and is all on-road but I ride further for
    fun as well. I need underseat steering and would be looking to get a Rohloff hub gear.

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4 mile
    commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    Anything else I should be considering? I'm off for some test rides at the start of March.

    Oh, and a couple of Qs:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting changed.
    Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is cycling wearing a
    suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra on weekdays?

    2. What's this 'leg suck' I've read about on merkin 'bent sites?

  2. Not Responding said:

    Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is cycling wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I
    have to start wearing lycra on weekdays?

    I think the ghastly-sounding 'leg suck' is a result of not having your feet tightly clipped into
    SPDs. It's when your feet/foot drop off the pedals and get stuck underneath the front axle.
    Sounds nasty.

    On the basis of this, I would say that SPDs are pretty much essential. On trikes at least.

    Simon

  3. On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:54:03 +0000, "[Not Responding]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    But if I were, hypothetically speaking, thinking rather seriously about buying a recumbent which
    should I consider? My current hot pick is the HPV Grasshopper. Any others I should consider?

    All of them! Ride as many as you can, they are all subtly different. Visit the shows and ride what
    you can, got to bentmongers and have a try.

    Quoted message said:

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4 mile
    commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    No lower than the Speedy. DO NOT buy any recumbent untiol you have tried the Trice Monster and / or
    XXL. Ahead grin factor 9, Mr Sulu...

    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent?

    Yes, especially a trike. You might be best off with a mesh-seat Trice.

    Quoted message said:

    Are SPD shoes compulsory?

    No, you can use Look, Eggbeaters, Atacs...

    Oh, ISWYM. I would not ride a 'bent without clipless, certainly not on a regular basis.

    Quoted message said:

    Is cycling wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra on
    weekdays?

    A suit jacket will be all over the place on a 'bent.

    Quoted message said:

    2. What's this 'leg suck' I've read about on merkin 'bent sites?

    It's where you have unwisely ignored the advice of Those Who Know and tried to ride a 'bent without
    clipless pedals. At some point your foot slips and your leg goes underneath. Nasty.

    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  4. "[Not Responding]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In case my wife reads this, I am only window shopping🙂

    But if I were, hypothetically speaking, thinking rather seriously about buying a recumbent which
    should I consider? My current hot pick is the HPV Grasshopper. Any others I should consider?

    cut,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the Trice seems unreasonably

    Quoted message said:

    low to the ground.


    I recently got a trice classic, (26" back wheel) its fine over rough and uneven ground and with the
    same slicks I fit to all my bikes, the rear wheel seems to grip better and slip less under power on
    very wet grass - especially now its fitted with a Rohloff hub. peter

  5. Go to Kinetics in Glasgow and try a few of Ben's machines. You will have to try a few to see what you like best.
    I find I am lot warmer on a recumbent, but usually wear less layers to compensate for it.
    Get clipless pedals, as your feet WILL slip off at some point. You will find it easier to pedal with them anyway.

    Good Luck

    Andy

  6. Not Responding said:

    In case my wife reads this, I am only window shopping🙂

    Of *course* you are... ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    But if I were, hypothetically speaking, thinking rather seriously about buying a recumbent which
    should I consider? My current hot pick is the HPV Grasshopper. Any others I should consider?

    Loads. There's no shortage of 20/20s, and you should try as many as you can. And you should also try
    different configurations as they may surprise you (for more on this, note that Guy's Stinger is the
    result of a trip to buy a trike, and also see my next post describing a weekend trip to the NL).

    For trying them out, the Usual Suspects are Future Cycles in Surrey, Bikefix and London Recumbents
    in the Smoke, D-Tek in Cambridge and Kinetics in Glasgow. Depending where you are, a trip to the
    continent may be worth considering (again, see my post on this last weekend).

    Quoted message said:

    My commute is 4 miles each way (or 8 if I avoid The Hill) and is all on-road but I ride further
    for fun as well. I need underseat steering and would be looking to get a Rohloff hub gear.

    The Rohloff is a standard option on all the HP-Vels but places like Kinetics also Know About
    Rohloffs and can fit one to anything. They're less likely to be standard options on the Dutch ones
    'cause there's just no point for the most part in the NL.

    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is cycling
    wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra on
    weekdays?

    Very much depends on the design. For a 4 mile utility commute bike I'd actually have a good hard
    look at the Spirit. It's very much a get on and ride off sort of thing, no SPuDs, lycra etc.
    required and it'll work fine in day to day clothes. For lower stuff like the other HPVels I'd
    definitely want SPuDs or SPuD-u-likes (I use ATACs). I wouldn't want to use the Spirit for a long
    hard tour or the like, but horses == courses and it should be an excellent utility bike.

    Quoted message said:

    2. What's this 'leg suck' I've read about on merkin 'bent sites?

    Dunno. Whatever it is, I've never suffered from anything I can think it would be in about 4 or 5
    years of regular 'bent riding, so it can't be that serious!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  7. Not Responding said:

    My commute is 4 miles each way (or 8 if I avoid The Hill) and is all on-road but I ride further
    for fun as well. I need underseat steering and would be looking to get a Rohloff hub gear.

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4 mile
    commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    Moreover, Windcheetahs cannot be had with either hub gears or USS. There are approximately a
    gazillion different model of Trice, though, with new ones coming out about once a fortnight, so
    while the Micro is lower than an adder's armpit, the Explorer is comparatively lofty. I've commuted
    into central London on both a Windcheetah and a Trice Micro, and neither was too scary.

    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is cycling
    wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra on
    weekdays?

    Clipless pedals are not compulsory but they /are/ a very very good idea. As an alternative, consider
    Powergrips, which are sort of Toestraps With Attitude.

    Quoted message said:

    2. What's this 'leg suck' I've read about on merkin 'bent sites?

    Foot comes adrift from pedal, strikes road and stops. [B|tr]icycle doesn't. Things tear and break. I
    have not done it myself, but have read of enough instances that I cannot recommend it...

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  8. "[Not Responding]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4 mile
    commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    Don't write it off before trying it. I lust after a Trice. Unfortunately, having just laid out
    roughly the price of one on a fiddle for young Mark, Trices would not appear to figure prominently
    in my immediate future.

    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is cycling
    wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra on
    weekdays?

    Lycra isn't necessary, but expecting to wear a smart suit and shoes might be pushing it a bit. If
    you can get away with slightly more casual clothes and shoes that could pass for trainers then SPDs
    are the thing. You can walk around quite happily in the shoes on flat ground.

    One more passing thought: as your medical condition effectively prevents you riding an upright,
    should the compassionate insurance company that expected you to pay for the damage to your
    assailant's bonnet not be funding your new 'bent?

    --
    Dave...

  9. Not Responding said:

    In case my wife reads this, I am only window shopping🙂

    Yeah. And window-test-riding in March, eh?

    Quoted message said:

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4 mile
    commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    There are tall trice and low trice. I commute (in Surrey commuter belt) on a Trice XL (supposedly
    eXtra Low, but there are more than one available lower now). Contrary to what everyone that's never
    ridden one will tell you - they are not so low as to be dangerous. In fact, while on an upright on
    my route I expect about one near-miss a month that could possibly be attributed to not being seen,
    I've had fewer than one a year on the Trice.

    Or is it ground clearance that you're concerned about? I ride mild off-road (tracks) on mine without
    trouble. You might be able to run aground, but the location of teh low point between the wheels
    makes it actually surprisingly difficult (I think you'd need to drop both font wheels into separate
    potholes).

    What could count against a trike is if a large proportion of your commute features filtering down
    traffic queues on narrow roads. I avoid doing so on teh Trice, and on one particular queue (a short
    one) on my route I wouldn't fit.

    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is
    cycling wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra
    on weekdays?

    Use clipless pedals. Do not use leather soled shoes. Otherwise, I find my trice (mesh seat) more
    compatible with normal clothes than an upright. Having said that, for my commuting I wear lycra and
    change at the office - I find it more compatible with teh vagaries of teh English weather.

    Quoted message said:

    2. What's this 'leg suck' I've read about on merkin 'bent sites?

    Foot comes off pedals. Foot strikes road and stops. Cyclist runs foot over, generally featuring
    snapping of things that shouldn't snap and sundry other nastinesses. Compound fracture, that sort of
    thing. Use clipless pedals.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  10. "Peter Clinch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [Not Responding] wrote:


    cut..............

    Quoted message said:

    The Rohloff is a standard option on all the HP-Vels but places like Kinetics also Know About
    Rohloffs and can fit one to anything. They're less likely to be standard options on the Dutch ones
    'cause there's just no point for the most part in the NL.

    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells
    Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

    Cut.... When considering trikes I contacted the Optima factory about having a Rohloff hub factory
    fitted to a new rider trike Very prompt reply from them saying they would do it, quoting a
    suprisingly low surcharge for this.

    Seriously thinking about it, but then a virtually unused trice at half price became available. peter

  11. Thanks for this and all the the other informative responses.

    Ian Smith said:
    Not Responding said:

    In case my wife reads this, I am only window shopping🙂

    Yeah. And window-test-riding in March, eh?

    Quoted message said:

    I rather like the idea of a trike but reckon the Windcheetah is a bit OTT pricewise (for a 4
    mile commute) and the Trice seems unreasonably low to the ground.

    There are tall trice and low trice. I commute (in Surrey commuter belt) on a Trice XL (supposedly
    eXtra Low, but there are more than one available lower now). Contrary to what everyone that's never
    ridden one will tell you - they are not so low as to be dangerous. In fact, while on an upright on
    my route I expect about one near-miss a month that could possibly be attributed to not being seen,
    I've had fewer than one a year on the Trice.

    Or is it ground clearance that you're concerned about? I ride mild off-road (tracks) on mine
    without trouble. You might be able to run aground, but the location of teh low point between the
    wheels makes it actually surprisingly difficult (I think you'd need to drop both font wheels into
    separate potholes).

    What could count against a trike is if a large proportion of your commute features filtering down
    traffic queues on narrow roads. I avoid doing so on teh Trice, and on one particular queue (a short
    one) on my route I wouldn't fit.

    Er, it's none of the above. It's an attack of vanity and a desire to limit any perceived
    eccentricity. Riding an upright is seen as odd enough. Riding a trike would be odder still. The
    lowness of the trikes and the almost totally prone position just compounds matters.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    1. On my normal bike I'm a utility rider and don't believe in working up a sweat or getting
    changed. Is this approach going to be workable on a 'bent? Are SPD shoes compulsory? Is
    cycling wearing a suit and leather soled shoes feasable or will I have to start wearing lycra
    on weekdays?

    Use clipless pedals. Do not use leather soled shoes. Otherwise, I find my trice (mesh seat) more
    compatible with normal clothes than an upright. Having said that, for my commuting I wear lycra and
    change at the office - I find it more compatible with teh vagaries of teh English weather.

    The English weather has never managed to chuck anything at me that couldn't be defeated by head to
    foot goretex and a pair of overshoes.

    The problem with getting changed for small commutes is that you spend twice as long changing as you
    do travelling.

  12. Ian Smith said:

    available lower now). Contrary to what everyone that's never ridden one will tell you - they are
    not so low as to be dangerous.

    Indeed. #1 question/statement I get is about vulnerability from low altitude, but I've yet to
    encounter any 'bent rider who's experienced a problem with it. When I haven't been seen it's not
    because I've been lower but because the Fool in question didn't look, and I know they didn't because
    I watched them not doing it! You can miss a double decker bus in dayglo yellow with 50 KW of
    lighting if you're looking the other way...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  13. Peter Clinch said:
    Ian Smith said:

    available lower now). Contrary to what everyone that's never ridden one will tell you - they are
    not so low as to be dangerous.

    Indeed. #1 question/statement I get is about vulnerability from low altitude, but I've yet to
    encounter any 'bent rider who's experienced a problem with it. When I haven't been seen it's not
    because I've been lower but because the Fool in question didn't look, and I know they didn't
    because I watched them not doing it! You can miss a double decker bus in dayglo yellow with 50 KW
    of lighting if you're looking the other way...

    Well, I have had people _claim_ they didn't see me. However, since they pulled out into teh
    other lane to go round the me they didn't see immediately before swerving in at me, I discounted
    the claims.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  14. Not Responding said:

    Thanks for this and all the the other informative responses.

    Ian Smith said:

    Use clipless pedals. Do not use leather soled shoes. Otherwise, I find my trice (mesh seat) more
    compatible with normal clothes than an upright. Having said that, for my commuting I wear lycra
    and change at the office - I find it more compatible with teh vagaries of teh English weather.

    The English weather has never managed to chuck anything at me that couldn't be defeated by head
    to foot goretex and a pair of overshoes.

    Two foot deep floods spring to mind.

    Anyway, I was thinking more of a ride that starts off (say) sleeting and then warms up. Or one where
    it's cold but still and there's alternate steep climbing and descending. Or one where I promise
    myself I'll take it easy, but I just feel too alive to potter and find myself pushing for another
    mph up the hill, or racing teh train to teh bridge, or whatever. In tehse or many other cases I can
    go from chilly to sweating and back quite quickly in normal clothes. Lycra and layers lets me adjust
    more quickly en-route (I'll happily quickly stuff a fleece under a pannier strap, I might balk at
    doing teh same with a pure new wool suit jacket), and if I know I'm going to get changed afterwards,
    I'll live with getting a bit sweaty towards the end of teh ride.

    Furthermore, I actually tend to find myself more comfortable in pertex over lightweight layers and
    some dampness gets through than a full hermetically-sealed goretex job.

    Despite all of which, I do ride in normal clothes if it's up to about 15 miles, I don't want to look
    odd at the other end and tehre's no simple changing facilities.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  15. Ian Smith said:

    Two foot deep floods spring to mind.

    I was once driving home late on Christmas eve in Cairo after a rare but torrential downpour. An
    underpass had flooded to a depth of about 12 inches, and as I watched, a nattily dressed young
    Egyptian in a cream suit and white patent leather shoes zipped past the *very* slowly moving cars
    and straight into it on a motorbike. He'd got to the deepest part when his motor spluttered and
    died, and watching him trying to keep an almost stationary motorbike upright without putting his
    feet into the muddy water reduced all of us to helpless giggles.

    --

    Debbie Urban Theology Unit, Sheffield Views expressed in this email are my own and are not
    necessarily those of the University of Sheffield or UTU.

  16. Ian Smith wrote:

    [about weatherproofing]

    Of course many 'bents will take a front fairing which will see off a lot of the incoming weather.
    The HPVel Spirit I'd suggested as a possibly ideal normal clothing commute bike has one as a
    standard option. Adds a little more to the weight, of course, but aero will improve as well as
    weatherproofing. hpvelotechnik.comdetails e.html has a pic of one in
    action at the bottom of the page.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.