Nanny state - was Re: We think we have it bad...

jtaylor wrote on 22/07/2006 15:43 +0100:

Quoted message said:

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to oppose
the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

Oh FFS jtaylor, stop your bloody cross posting. If I'd wanted my post
posted in rbt I would have done it myself - I don't need idiots like you
doing it for me.

*Plonk*

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

"jtaylor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]!nnrp1.uunet.ca...

Quoted message said:

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just came across this law that was proposed for Texas:
http://www.bicycle-law.com/txaction.htm

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to oppose
the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

Yawn...so there was a dunce in the Texas legislature in '01.

Cal

jtaylor said:

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to
oppose the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

You misspelled cross-posted. Hell, you've done it about a hundred times
just in the last few months; one would think you'd have the terminology down
pat by now.

Tired, tired stuff...

BS

In article <[email hidden]!nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to oppose
the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

That's what r.b.soc is for. *PLONK*

--

__o Kristian Zoerhoff
_'\(,_ [email hidden]
(_)/ (_)

in message <[email hidden]!nnrp1.uunet.ca>, jtaylor

(') said:

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

[snip: tired old reposting of ancient history which didn't actually
happen anyway]

Quoted message said:

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to
oppose the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

Look, just /stop/ setting out to make trouble, will you?

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

Morning had broken, and we had run out of gas for the welding torch.

jtaylor said:

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just came across this law that was proposed for Texas:
http://www.bicycle-law.com/txaction.htm

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to oppose
the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

Well, here is prove positive, our dishonest little weasel, is really
just a troll.

Now it makes sense, nobody really believes that helmets do more harm
than good.

So, apparently he isn't so much an AHZ as a lowlife troll. Reasonably
well played, until now. Restraint is the mark of a good troll, but
most find it a hard rule to follow.

Life is Good!
Jeff

Jeff Starr said:

jtaylor said:

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just came across this law that was proposed for Texas:
http://www.bicycle-law.com/txaction.htm

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Reposted for the benefit of any readers of r.b.t who might want to oppose
the increasing nanny-state erosion of USofA cyclists' freedoms.

Well, here is prove positive, our dishonest little weasel, is really
just a troll.

Now it makes sense, nobody really believes that helmets do more harm
than good.

So, apparently he isn't so much an AHZ as a lowlife troll. Reasonably
well played, until now. Restraint is the mark of a good troll, but
most find it a hard rule to follow.

If everyone just ignores it, maybe it will die of attention deficit
desperation.