Is this a new usage of the N+1 formula? You only have to sell a current bike when it is to fund the N+1th bike acquisition, never for the current acquisition?
I'm wondering that too. I bought a new frame, intending to sell the old one (a 1986 Litespeed Ultimate). Then the wife expressed a hint of interest in the old one. Of course, she never will get on it, but it gave me the merest excuse I needed to keep it. After all, who would pay what it's really worth? Am thinking now how to build it up into the sweetest SS.
Is this a new usage of the N+1 formula? You only have to sell a current bike when it is to fund the N+1th bike acquisition, never for the current acquisition?
Works for me. But in all honesty the bike was never going to be ridden, much better to sell the frame to somebody who would ride it.