On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:41:15 -0600, "Surf McBrowse" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Somewhat disappointing. I rather liked to entertain the ideas that Roger did indeed live near the
Firth of Forth, ogle young Polish lassies working in the fields, endure the contemptuous mood
swings on his young breathen whilst trying his mettle on snowboard, and enjoyed a comfortable semi-
retirement after working for the good of the public health.
Yeah, he was an interesting guy, wasn't he? We all came to quite like him in the end. Thing was, we
came to like him a bit too much, and became somewhat melancholy when we realised we'd created the
perfect Usenet character that, unfortunately, wasn't real.
Regrettably, for reasons that must remain, to you, unclear, I am unable to advise which parts of
'Roger' were real and which were fabricated.
I like to think that somewhere a complete person like 'Roger' does exist. Maybe a little bit of him
does, in all of us. He was a good man.
Quoted message said:Oh well, your 20% will have to do. I do hope you will be every bit as much the suave silver tongued
menace as the fictional Roger you once penned for the Legion of Doom et al. Why not start a new but
similar character? How about Jean-Louis Vignes a young wealthy runner/philanthropist/voyeur, or
Simon Frothingham a disowned member of the Royal Family ....
Oooh, I think I should leave that world firmly in the past, don't you? Were I to spend my life
creating fictional characters for your delectation I would think my life poorly spent. Nope, you'll
have to be satisfied with me. Besides, being the 'voice' of Roger means that my style of delivery
stays the same, though the stories may change.
Think of it as falling in love with a beautiful hooker who promises to
your wedding night that she's actually a penniless, chaste, maiden who
have to find it, that's all.