General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

muscles

Started by valhalla · · Last activity · 29 posts · 695 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 February 2005
Last activity
1 March 2005
Original author
valhalla
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
695
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–29 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. warehouse wrote:
    :: Cubit wrote:
    :::
    ::: In recent times they have discovered a large collection of
    ::: hormone-like messengers that fat cells send into the body. They
    ::: may be responsible for increased risks such as CVD, diabetes,
    ::: cancer, etc. In addition, I hypothesize that they act to alter
    ::: psychology, and on our current topic, I SUSPECT THAT THEY ACT
    ::: ANABOLIC. I'm suggesting that the 400 or 500 pound person is able
    ::: to walk, move, & function not because of the exercise during the
    ::: weight gain period, but rather as a natural body enhancement
    ::: triggered by hormones released by the fat. It would be logical for
    ::: the body to have such a design. If my hypothesis is right, the
    ::: loss of 300 pounds of fat will remove the hypothetical hormones,
    ::: and the muscles will atrophy back to a normal size, as a natural
    ::: process.
    ::
    :: Preposterous. Performance athletes would be breaking down
    :: Fat-Folks-In-Denial's doors to let their blood for their own
    :: injection. Steroids be damned! Gimme that Krispy Kreme Kritter's
    :: hormones.
    :: That's the ticket. It couldn't possibly be the fact that it takes
    :: more muscle mass to move, lift or otherwise cajole the 500 pounds
    :: versus 150 pounds into vertical movement. Consequently, anybody
    :: with a 5% bodyfat would be a withering pool of Jello brand gelatin
    :: because the magic fat-faeries forgot to deliver those "natural body
    :: enhancement" hormones.

    🙂

  2. "warehouse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Preposterous. Performance athletes would be breaking down
    Fat-Folks-In-Denial's doors to let their blood for their own injection.
    Steroids be damned! Gimme that Krispy Kreme Kritter's hormones.
    That's the ticket. It couldn't possibly be the fact that it takes more
    muscle mass to move, lift or otherwise cajole the 500 pounds versus 150
    pounds into vertical movement. Consequently, anybody with a 5% bodyfat
    would be a withering pool of Jello brand gelatin because the magic
    fat-faeries forgot to deliver those "natural body enhancement"
    hormones.


    I was trying to determine if his "argument" was really serious and trying to
    come up with an appropriately far out response, but you beat me to it.
    LOL.! Thanks for the laugh! Damn those fat faeries!

    Mark

    260/235/200 since: 18/01/2005 monthly-goal: 12 month-start: 235

  3. "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JC Der Koenig said:

    "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:

    >Roger,
    >
    >Why are you never in the Robochallenge?

    Non sequitur.

    Good question though.

    Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you? Cubit was
    talking out of his ass and finally needed something to respond back with.

    What's your bodyfat%?

  4. "Mark McArthey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "valhalla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    First off, most 400 lb people aren't necessarily that muscled. That
    depends. However, a lot of those people will have a greater proportion
    of
    lower body muscle than your typical non-athletic person. Those who
    lifted
    weight due ot playing sports or something, could have significantly


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    muslce than your average joe. if they continue to lift while losing,
    they
    can hold on to a lot (not all) of that muscle.

    I do actually have alot of muscle. Many people do not think of me as
    conventionally
    fat because I am a big football player type.


    Regardless of what I, or anyone else, might say, you will likely find your
    own exercise/diet regimen that works best for you. Shocking, isn't it?


    🙂

    Quoted message said:

    Take heart in the fact that it actually is possible to build muscle while
    dieting.

    I am very happy about that prospect. That is one thing I have not been
    able to figure.

    There are many variations of an LC diet available, and with slight

    Quoted message said:

    modifications you should be able to maintain a large amount of your lean
    muscle. Granted, the typical aerobic/low-calorie diet would definately


    not

    Quoted message said:

    spare any muscle, but a combination of anaerobic weight training,
    maintaining glycogen stores prior to workouts, and watching your caloric
    intake, and you should be on the road to success. More than one person on
    the list has been able to maintain/build muscle on some variation of an LC
    diet. Please experiment and research your own best path and keep us
    informed!
    Good luck!
    Mark

    260/235/200 since: 18/01/2005

  5. JC Der Koenig said:

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JC Der Koenig said:

    "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...
    > Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:
    >
    >>Roger,
    >>
    >>Why are you never in the Robochallenge?
    >
    > Non sequitur.
    >

    Good question though.

    Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you?
    Cubit was talking out of his ass and finally needed something to
    respond back with.

    What's your bodyfat%?

    Don't know.

  6. "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JC Der Koenig said:

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    > message news:[email hidden]...
    >> Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:
    >>
    >>>Roger,
    >>>
    >>>Why are you never in the Robochallenge?
    >>
    >> Non sequitur.
    >>
    >
    > Good question though.

    Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you?
    Cubit was talking out of his ass and finally needed something to
    respond back with.

    What's your bodyfat%?

    Don't know.

    It's rather difficult to conclude that you've gained muscle mass then.

  7. JC Der Koenig said:

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JC Der Koenig said:

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    >> message news:[email hidden]...
    >>> Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:
    >>>
    >>>>Roger,
    >>>>
    >>>>Why are you never in the Robochallenge?
    >>>
    >>> Non sequitur.
    >>>
    >>
    >> Good question though.
    >
    > Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you?
    > Cubit was talking out of his ass and finally needed something to
    > respond back with.
    >
    >

    What's your bodyfat%?

    Don't know.

    It's rather difficult to conclude that you've gained muscle mass then.

    Did you read the other post?

  8. "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JC Der Koenig said:

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>> "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    >>> message news:[email hidden]...
    >>>> Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:
    >>>>
    >>>>>Roger,
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Why are you never in the Robochallenge?
    >>>>
    >>>> Non sequitur.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Good question though.
    >>
    >> Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you?
    >> Cubit was talking out of his ass and finally needed something to
    >> respond back with.
    >>
    >>
    >
    > What's your bodyfat%?

    Don't know.

    It's rather difficult to conclude that you've gained muscle mass then.

    Did you read the other post?

    I read something about you believing that you've gained muscle, but I don't
    remember the specifics now.

  9. JC Der Koenig wrote:
    :: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :: news:[email hidden]...
    ::: JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    :::: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :::: news:[email hidden]...
    ::::: JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    :::::: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :::::: news:[email hidden]...
    ::::::: JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote:
    :::::::: "Concordia (Suze)" <suze_anderson@spamcop/dot/obvious> wrote in
    :::::::: message news:[email hidden]...
    ::::::::: Quoting "Cubit" <[email hidden]>:
    :::::::::
    :::::::::: Roger,
    ::::::::::
    :::::::::: Why are you never in the Robochallenge?
    :::::::::
    ::::::::: Non sequitur.
    :::::::::
    ::::::::
    :::::::: Good question though.
    :::::::
    ::::::: Nonsense. I don't need robochallenge to lose weight. Do you?
    ::::::: Cubit was talking out of his ass and finally needed something to
    ::::::: respond back with.
    :::::::
    :::::::
    ::::::
    :::::: What's your bodyfat%?
    :::::
    ::::: Don't know.
    :::::
    :::::
    ::::
    :::: It's rather difficult to conclude that you've gained muscle mass
    :::: then.
    :::
    ::: Did you read the other post?
    :::
    :::
    ::
    :: I read something about you believing that you've gained muscle, but
    :: I don't remember the specifics now.

    It started off with "It's hard to say for sure,...." and then it went on to
    point out the time periods in which I think it occurred. However, something
    being difficult doesn't make it impossible, ASSUMING it was difficult in the
    first place.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.