"You must know cyclists with huge thighs that have never done weights."
The ones that fit that description I recall dropping like proverbial bad habits on the climbs. They usually tend to be too cumbersome and heavy boned. The ones to watch, I think, are the skinny, light riders who put in a lot of miles. I recall one who came whizzing past me at about 25 mph and it was tough holding his wheel.
In short, in my particular zone, the riders with big legs don't tend to be as good as the leaner club-riders and these guys tend to do so many miles, they have a tendency to stay lean. Certainly Lance Armstrong doesn't have huge legs and his body type is mesomorphic.
I agree with you that some riders (or especially sprinters) will get some increase in quad development but, as a general rule, thousands of pedal strokes over long periods of time doesn't trigger muscle growth in the average person. This is especially the case, I think, if you ride every day.
Having said that, I do detect an increase in my own quad girth since I moved to bigger gear riding and maybe due to the fact I still squat once a week and throw in rest days. Plus, I'm not a marathon style rider and opt for two hour burns instead.
So, I agree with you up to a point.
531Aussie said:I think we might've had this "discussion" a year ago.....🙂
I'm surprised by people who have your view.
We shouldn't generalize from our own experiences, should we? I would say that people with mesomorphic tendencies are most likely to experience some (at least initial) quad hypertrophy from cycling, provided the intensity is high enough (max sprints, hill sprints, etc), and caloric/protein & recovery requirements are met.
You must know cyclists with huge thighs that have never done weights.
My experience, as a twenty year old, was that my thighs "ballooned" almost 2 inches during the first few months of me beginning a sprint training routine. My legs then plataued and have probably been the same size for the last 15 years, although I don't measure them anymore :p